fbpx
Connect with us

Opinion

MORGAN: Don’t give Extinction Rebellion extremists an inch

The Kitimat terminal is an $18 billion project that’s nearly half-built. There is no way we are shutting down those projects now, so we may as well stop all discussion of it.

mm

Published

on

The only time it is possible to negotiate with demonstrators or protesters is when there is something negotiable. When it comes to the increasingly aggressive protests against the Coastal Gaslink Pipeline (CGL) that have been springing up across Canada, there is nothing to negotiate.

Radical activists have been blocking roads and transportation infrastructure in sporadic protests while making the demand that the CGL project be halted. Let’s face it, the CGL is a $6-billion line and it is over half-built. It is an essential piece of infrastructure providing natural gas to the Kitimat LNG terminal. The Kitimat terminal is an $18 billion project that’s nearly half-built. There is no way we are shutting down those projects now, so we may as well stop all discussion of it.

The only silver lining that could be found in the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak in early 2020 was it brought the anti-CLG blockades to an end. Criminal blockades of rail lines across Canada ostensibly in support of the handful of Wet’suet’en hereditary chiefs (who do not represent the Wet’suet’en) who opposed the CGL project in BC. Most of the blockades were occupied by (white) career protesters who need little excuse to interrupt the lives of productive Canadians as they try to find a sense of purpose for themselves. When people ask, “don’t they have anything better to do with their time?”, the answer is “no.”

Governments at all levels are crippled with fear when it comes to dealing with protesters, particularly if there is any kind of indigenous element involved with them. Politicians cower in fear at the thought of video imagery involving a native protester being roughly arrested by police. They avoid dealing with these protests as long as possible and it inevitably leads to escalation and confrontation. Unreasonable protests and blockades must be nipped in the bud early or the radicals will entrench themselves.

It took months to dislodge the “occupy” protesters who were squatting in city parks throughout North America in 2011. Negotiations with the squatters were futile and by the time police finally moved in to remove them, the activists had developed a feeling of entitlement to the parks they were dwelling in. Many violent confrontations ensued as police were forced to physically dislodge the activists from parks. This all could have been avoided had authorities kicked these radicals out of city parks months before.

We are in the early stages of what could be nationwide blockades and protests against the CGL project all over again. If governments don’t take a zero-tolerance approach to illegal blockades and disruptive protests right now, we can be assured these actions will spread. Politicians won’t be able to count on a pandemic outbreak to save their butts this time so they had better act sooner rather than later. It won’t get easier for waiting.

The embers of a national conflagration of violent protest actions are burning while activists of profile fan them. This can’t be ignored.

Radicals like David Suzuki are using inflammatory language in an effort to incite more extreme — even violent — actions from protesters. Leonardo DeCaprio and other vacuous celebrities are tweeting support for illegal blockaders and it is leading to hundreds of thousands of dollars being raised in support of them.

In Edmonton, protesters were so bold they actually set up a propane-fueled fireplace on a bridge as they blocked access and disrupted thousands of commuters. The irony of burning Alberta fossil fuels to stay warm in a protest against Alberta fossil fuels was seemingly lost on them.

In Calgary, protesters blocked roads and LRT tracks downtown during the rush hour leading to traffic snarls and infuriating commuters. The irony of blocking green mass transit while demanding more green mass transit was seemingly lost on them.

It has to be understood what these activists are doing right now is testing the waters. As long as authorities refuse to push back or make arrests when protesters push legal boundaries, activists will continue to escalate their actions. They understand their demands are unreasonable, but also know as long as there are no consequences for their actions, they will keep pressuring citizens.

The right to protest is an essential one. Nobody is saying those opposed to the CGL project shouldn’t be allowed to demonstrate. But we have to draw the line at illegal disruptions and attacks. Civil disobedience is not warranted in this case. There are no civil rights being violated by the CGL project. It is a legal energy infrastructure project approved by all 20 of the legitimate First Nations chiefs and councils residing near where the pipeline will be.

Ironically, the CGL pipeline will contribute to mitigating world CO2 emissions once it is in operation. Ethically sourced natural gas will be exported to states currently using coal as a primary fuel source today. While natural gas is not emission-free, it is many magnitudes less harmful than using coal as energy feedstock. From a pragmatic perspective, the CGL line will help the world’s environment.

The CGL line and associated Kitimat LNG terminal will employ hundreds of First Nations peoples in Northern BC. Partnerships and revenue sharing plans will ensure communities will all benefit from the operation of the line and terminal for generations.

Radical activists in opposition to the CGL line are actually supporting the continuation of using coal as an energy source in developing nations; they just don’t seem to know it. Opponents to the CGL line also are working to put hundreds of First Nations people out of work while costing local communities valuable revenue. Political leaders need to quit hiding from these activists and start pushing back. There is a solid ethical case to be made in requiring that these protests remain within legal bounds (that is, now allowing the disruption or destruction of people and property).

More protests are coming and they will become more extreme. We can anticipate blockades of rail lines, roads, and other means of transportation. People will be hindered in their free movement and legal enterprise is being put at risk. The protests aren’t sweeping the nation yet though. There is still time to stop this in its tracks.

We can’t stop the CGL project and we can’t let these radical activists continue with disruptive actions unchecked.

It will take a demonstration of political courage and will for a change though. I am not terribly confident we will see it.

Cory Morgan is the Alberta Political Columnist for the Western Standard and Host of the Cory Morgan Show

Continue Reading
2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Stew James

    November 24, 2021 at 10:38 pm

    Well we know Justin’s bell hops are not going to do anything! If you’re looking for one, try the local donut shop, it’s about all they are good for, donut boys!
    Respect is earned and they have a lot work to do, beside carrying Justin’s illegal friends bags for them.

    Upholding the law for the people of canada doesn’t exist!

  2. Leslie Solar

    November 24, 2021 at 7:53 pm

    You are close, Cory. Ezra Levant actually tracked some of these “protesters” across Canada. The same ones were seen in various places and cities all over Canada. Apprarently they were basically paid activists. (at that time Suzuki was also showing up at various places, and Ezra was also following him with a mic. but (funny thing) he didnt want to engage with Ezra. (this was in the days when his program was not behind a paywall, and I havent followed him for awhile)

    Dan Bongino has explained how mobs act, and do things that they wouldnt normally do. There is typically a paid “leader” with a megaphone who turns up the emotional heat and others who hand out projectiles to the general mob.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Opinion

BRADLEY: No Central Bank Digital Currency can stack up to Bitcoin

Why Bitcoin will always be the superior digital currency.

mm

Published

on

These days, many countries are considering introducing their own Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).

The Bank of England recently released a research paper discussing the possibility of creating its own digital currency, saying it has “not yet made a decision on whether to introduce CBDC”.

In July 2021, the Bank of Canada issued a discussion paper called “The Positive Case for a CBDC”, citing it “could be an effective competition policy tool for payments” and “could also support the vibrancy of the digital economy.”

But no country is moving faster on this front than China.

The Central Bank of China has already introduced a digital yuan, which is expected to eliminate physical cash and provide a centralized payment-processing network.

As China continues to expand its CBDC implementation beyond its trial run in some cities, more of its citizens will be forced into using the government’s app to identify themselves, store their wealth and make everyday purchases. That means the Chinese government will be able to track purchases and even freeze or close personal accounts, for whatever reason they see fit.

That is a terrifying prospect – and it highlights one of the many reasons bitcoin will always be superior to any currency issued and controlled by any government.

The Bitcoin network uses blockchain technology to track the status of the network, including user balances and transactions. This allows transparency and decentralization by nature. Perhaps most importantly, this means that the system cannot be controlled or influenced by any one person, company or government.

China’s digital yuan – and any CBDC under consideration – have the complete opposite fundamentals. With a CBDC, one central bank has ultimate control and power over the currency, not to mention the ability to track and even reverse everyday purchases.

It’s a particularly worrisome situation in China, where its government has been pushing a social credit system that, at its core, rewards or punishes people for their economic and personal behaviours. As the country implements its digital yuan more broadly, there are fears China could use its CBDC to extend control over even more of its citizens’ rights and freedoms.

We don’t face that threat in western countries yet, but that’s not to say we are immune from the possibility. If Meta’s recent announcement that it’s shutting down the face recognition system on Facebook is any indication, our society is definitely not keen on being monitored, controlled, or surveilled in any way.

From 2013 to 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice ran Operation Choke Point to monitor and crack down on payments for what the government deemed “high-risk activities”, ranging from online gambling and payday loans to pornography and surveillance equipment sales. These activities were not illegal but they offended the government’s moral compass – a slippery and scary slope.

Most recently, in October 2021 U.S. President Joe Biden and his government backed down from requiring the IRS to collect data on every bank account with more than $600 in annual transactions. 

Infringements like these on our privacy are unacceptable. But the likelihood of them happening will grow exponentially if, and when, western governments introduce their own CBDCs.

Aside from a potential loss of personal freedom and privacy, CBDCs would introduce another undesirable outcome: even greater inflation than we’re experiencing today. Governments, including our own here in Canada, are printing money faster than ever, which simultaneously drives inflation and devalues personal wealth.

As Saifedean Ammous writes in his fantastic book, The Fiat Standard: The Debt Slavery Alternative to Human Civilization, “CBDCs would allow for the implementation of…inflationist schemes with high efficiency, allowing for increased central planning of market activity. Government spending would proceed unabated by whatever little discipline credit markets currently exert. Real-world prices are likely to rise, which would lead to more control over economic production to mandate prices.”

To sum this up, CBDCs could lead to higher inflation, less personal autonomy, and more government meddling. For those reasons, whenever I’m asked if the introduction of CBDCs will kill bitcoin and its relevance, my answer is a resounding, “No.”

Central bank digital currencies are not the same thing as bitcoin. They aren’t even competitors with bitcoin, nor will they ever replace bitcoin. They are a distraction. In my opinion, CBDCs will only create greater demand for bitcoin and its many advantages.

Bitcoin offers individuals the profound ability to own sound money, protect their wealth from inflation and keep governments from micro-managing their finances. That is certainly not what CBDCs will do, and it’s why we should all be very apprehensive about giving central banks the ability to issue, oversee and control digital currencies.

No CBDC can, or ever will, stack up to bitcoin.

Guest Column from Dave Bradley, Chief Revenue Officer at Bitcoin Well
@bitcoinbrains on Twitter

Sponsored by Bitcoin Well

Continue Reading

Opinion

ROYER: Canada ignores Alberta. Because it can

The only conclusion is that Canada is not a functioning, modern federal democracy. It caters almost exclusively to the needs of the two primary provinces.

mm

Published

on

Crickets. That is the sound of Canada’s response to Alberta’s request to consider revisions to the equalization program over a month ago. What does the deafening silence say about Canada?

Trudeau brushed off the referendum saying that he couldn’t unilaterally address the issue, although he clearly can. His government has several bilateral agreements with provinces other than Alberta.  He can agree to change the equalization formula to drain less wealth from Alberta and Saskatchewan in the first place.

The federal Conservative Party’s silence is due to their leader Erin O’Toole’s decision to pander to Ontario and Quebec, taking the West for granted.

The silence has made one thing absolutely clear: Alberta has no voice in Canada. Voting against the Liberals hasn’t worked. Voting in a couple of Liberal MPs hasn’t helped. Relying on protection provincial sovereignty under the constitution has proven to be useless; Trudeau’s government intercedes into those defined powers with impunity.

All that remains is to look at the big picture. Alberta had no democratic input into decisions that dramatically diminished its economy. Wealth continues to be drained from the province and it has no means to stop it. A referendum — the ultimate expression of democratic rights — is ignored. What does this make Canada?

First, it clearly is not a modern democratic nation. Modern democracies give voice to minorities and seek compromise.

We do not have a federal government. There is no structural input from the far reaches of the country in the nation’s decision-making process. It is a central government, serving only the centre.

We are not really a federation either. Rights of the lesser provinces are extinguished at the whim of the central government. Those intrusions are dutifully upheld by the Supreme Court, an institution with a majority of judges from central Canada. The Senate is completely ineffective in protecting the federation. It over-represents Quebec and Atlantic Canada, is appointed at the sole discretion of the prime minister and has very limited powers to disagree with him. Alberta’s attempt to introduce democracy into the selection of Senators has been ignored by the prime minister.

Power is extremely concentrated. Trudeau’s emissions cap on hydrocarbon production is just the most recent example. No discussion with Parliament or the provinces was taken; he just made the decision with his personal staff, and announced it

He has this power because hyper-partisanship, strict party discipline and the overly centralized government concentrates power. We’ve abandoned our historic Westminster Parliamentary system of government and taken on an American style constitutional system with judicial supremacy, but with an all-powerful prime minister that lacks the checks-and-balances placed upon an American president.

The only respectful response to Alberta came from Saskatchewan’s Premier Scott Moe. He called for his province to become a nation within a nation, a status effectively granted Quebec. Neither the federal structure nor the national parliament protect the outlying provinces. They now need to gain near national powers in order to protect themselves from the central government.

The only conclusion is Canada is not a functioning, modern federal democracy. It caters almost exclusively to the needs of the two primary provinces: Ontario and Quebec. The concentration of power and the malleability of federal sovereignties has makes the prime minister effectively an elected dictator. The only check on the prime minister’s power is in an occasional national election, the results of which are determined almost entirely in Ontario and Quebec.

So, what is Canada? It is a country in which the central provinces in conjunction with the central government have dominion over the outlying provinces, and those central provinces elect a prime minister who is given near royal prerogative.

Our country is called (at least officially) the Dominion of Canada, a constitutional monarchy. By the word dominion are we saying that the centre has dominion over the rest of the country? And does constitutional democracy say that the constitution concentrates power into the hands of a single person?

We can do better.

Randy Royer is a Western Standard columnist

Continue Reading

Energy

VENKATACHALAM & KAPLAN: Oil and gas production is essential to BC’s economy

Here’s another slice of statistical bread to consider: In 2017 the BC oil and gas industry purchased $5.6 billion worth of goods and services from other sectors.

mm

Published

on

Guest column by Ven Venkatachalam and Lennie Kaplan of the Canadian Energy Centre

British Columbia has been producing oil and natural gas since 1952. In fact, as of 2018, BC produced 32% of Canada’s natural gas production and 2% of Canada’s conventional daily oil production. British Columbia collects royalties from oil and gas development, supporting the economic prosperity in the province.

Want to know how important the oil and natural gas industry is to the BC economy? Using customized Statistic Canada data from 2017 (the latest year available for this comparison), it turns out oil and gas in BC  generated about $18 billion in outputs, consisting primarily of the value of goods and services produced, as well as a GDP of $9.5 billion.

As for what most of us can relate to — jobs — the BC oil and gas industry was responsible for nearly 26,500 direct jobs and more than 36,100 indirect jobs (62,602 jobs in total) in 2017. Also relevant: The oil and gas sector paid out over $3.1 billion in wages and salaries to BC workers that year.

Here’s another slice of statistical bread to consider: In 2017 the BC oil and gas industry purchased $5.6 billion worth of goods and services from other sectors. That included $600 million from the finance and insurance sector, $770 million in professional services, and $2.8 billion from the manufacturing sector, to name just three examples.

Spending by the oil and gas sector in BC is not the only way to consider the impact of the industry. Given that a large chunk of the oil and gas sector is next door in Alberta, let’s look at what Alberta’s trade relationship with its westerly neighbour does for BC.

BC’s interprovincial trade in total with all provinces in 2017 amounted to $39.4 billion. Alberta was responsible for the largest amount at $15.4 billion, or about 38%, of that trade.

That share of BC’s trade exports is remarkable, given that Alberta’s share of Canada’s population was just 11.5 percent in 2017. Alberta consumers, businesses and governments buy far more from BC in goods and services than its population as a share of Canada would suggest would be the case. Alberta’s capital-intensive, high-wage-paying oil and gas sector is a major reason why.

If Alberta were a country, the province’s $15.4 billion in trade with BC would come in behind only the United States (about $22.3 billion in purchases of goods and services from BC) in 2017. In fact, Alberta’s importance to B.C. exports was ranked far ahead of China ($6.9 billion), Japan ($4.5 billion), and South Korea ($2.9 billion)—the next biggest destinations for BC’s trade exports.

BC has a natural advantage for market access in some respects when compared to the United States. For instance, BC’s coast is near to many Asian-Pacific markets than are U.S. Gulf Coast facilities. The distance between the U.S. Gulf Coast and to the Japanese ports of Himeji and Sodegaura is more than 9,000 nautical miles, compared to less than 4,200 nautical miles between those two Japanese ports and the coast of BC.

The recent demand for natural gas in Asia, especially Japan (the largest importer of LNG) and price increase for natural gas, presents an exciting opportunity for BC oil and gas industry. The IEA predicts that by 2024 , natural gas demand forecast in Asia will be up 7% from 2019’s pre-COVID-19  levels. 

Be it in employment, salaries and wages paid, GDP, or the purchase of goods and services, the impact of oil and natural gas (and Alberta) on BC’s economy and trade flows is significant.

Guest column by Ven Venkatachalam and Lennie Kaplan are with the Canadian Energy Centre

Continue Reading

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Share

Petition: No Media Bailouts

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

810 signatures

No Media Bailouts

The fourth estate is critical to a functioning democracy in holding the government to account. An objective media can't maintain editorial integrity when it accepts money from a government we expect it to be critical of.

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

**your signature**



The Western Standard will never accept government bailout money. By becoming a Western Standard member, you are supporting government bailout-free and proudly western media that is on your side. With your support, we can give Westerners a voice that doesn\'t need taxpayers money.

Share this with your friends:

Trending

Copyright © Western Standard New Media Corp.