fbpx
Connect with us

Opinion

SLOBODIAN: Liberals set to gut the military through forced COVID vaccinations

Yet military brass is clapping like trained seals in approval over the current threat to reduce personnel numbers even more. All personnel must be fully vaccinated.

mm

Published

on

China has gone beyond saber-rattling to breach air defence zones near Taiwan. A feared pending invasion forcing Taiwan to become the PRC’s 34th province could spark a global conflict.

The European Union has renewed calls for an EU military force to counter the shockingly rapid rise of an Islamic terrorist threat since the August U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan that armed the bad guys with $85 billion in military equipment left behind.

Things are heating up elsewhere, including, once again, the Balkans. 

The world could be set on fire faster than a flick of a BIC. 

And just this weekend, a Canadian who was part of a charity group building an orphanage in Haiti was kidnapped by gangsters and is likely being held for ransom.

Canada Armed Forces (CAF) may be called on, in a heartbeat, to deploy abroad or to another major crisis on the home front.

Yet the federal government is hellbent on depleting Canada’s already severely reduced military that shrunk between 2,000-2,800 in the past year, bringing it to a shortage hovering around 10,000 personnel.

In May, the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) put out a plea to foreign pilots to come fly Canada’s military helicopters and jets to fill between 130-225 spots. That brings to mind an old saying shared by a friend: You’ll always have a military in your country. It’s just better if it’s your military.”

Yet military brass is clapping like trained seals in approval over the current threat to reduce personnel numbers even more. All personnel must be fully vaccinated.

In an October 15 Defence Team Messages e-mail flagged as Important for all Defence Team members, CAF personnel were ordered to “complete your COVID-19 vaccination attestation today.” 

All Department of National Defence (DOD) public service employees and CAF members must complete a vaccine attestation by October 29, regardless of status — fully, partially or unvaccinated. 

“You have an obligation to provide a true attestation. Submitting a false statement … may end up in disciplinary action up to and including termination,” says the e-mail.

“Attestations will be audited and managers can ask for proof of vaccinations at any time.”

CAF members unwilling to comply with COVID-19 full vaccination directive “may be subject to remedial or alternative measures.” 

“Public servants who do not attest to their vaccination status, or are unwilling to be vaccinated, will be placed on administrative leave without pay as of Nov. 15, 2021.”

“In the exceptional case that you are unable to be vaccinated because of a certified medical contraindication, religion, or another prohibited ground for discrimination as defined under the Canadian Human Rights Act, you may request accommodation.”

“Your manager, in consultation with labour relations (for public servants) and the chain of command (for CAF members), will then determine and implement appropriate accommodation measures, if deemed appropriate. Managers will provide temporary mitigation measures for the Defence Team member while gathering relevant information on both the validity of the accommodation requirement and the appropriate measures.”

Who is this defence team? Do people who wouldn’t last two minutes on a night patrol in a conflict zone have the power to lord over military personnel and decide if they can keep their jobs to feed their kids?

Our armed forces members are trusted to make split-second life or death decisions, but they don’t have the right to bodily autonomy because some fool sitting behind a desk says so.

And imagine the anguish of uncertainty that swirls around the unknown. Will the unvaccinated who are forced to quit keep their pensions? Medical benefits? 

Is there any truth to the rumor that certain parts of the military will be exempt from this tyranny? Would that be the foreign pilots on the payroll?

No worries, a senior army commander flippantly said Sunday. About 90% of military personnel are fully vaccinated and he doesn’t expect much opposition from the rest who aren’t.

That leaves 10% who might be forced out, which is a lot in a depleted military that commanders keep raising alarms about being short-staffed.

Brig.-Gen. Bill Fletcher, who heads 12,000 reservists and regular forces in Western Canada’s 3rd Division, appears to be more concerned with bowing to his Liberal masters than fighting for troops who have vaccination concerns.

“It’s been made very clear by the government that we will follow the same direction that the government has given the public service and we will enforce mandatory vaccines averse the Canadian military,” Fletcher told CBC News.

It makes you long for the days when generals acted like generals in charge.

Fletcher also said he couldn’t comment on what will happen to unvaccinated personnel.

They’ll lose their jobs sir, but let them eat cake.

If a high-ranking commander won’t fight for all troops, then who will? No one it seems.

The Canadian military is facing a personnel shortage because people are getting out and the recruitment system is broken.

Despite Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s promises ages ago to bolster the ranks, along with a lot of hoopla in 2018 over a recruiting drive, the numbers haven’t manifested.

It’s not that Canadians aren’t eager to sign up. About 20,000 people are on the waiting list to get in. The system to process them is excruciatingly slow.

Is that incompetence or intentional? Those Liberals hardly have a good track record when it comes to supporting our men and women in uniform.

This is just the latest example. 

Slobodian is the Senior Manitoba Columnist for the Western Standard
lslobodian@westernstandardonline.com

Linda Slobodian is the Manitoba Senior Columnist for the Western Standard. She has been an investigative columnist with the Calgary Herald, Calgary Sun, Edmonton Sun, and Alberta Report. lslobodian@westernstandardonline.com

Continue Reading
5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Non-Compliant Alberta Separatist

    October 20, 2021 at 1:18 pm

    I guess when the SHTF event occurs, the “great unwashed” won’t have to worry about the military of Canada.

    Turd-oh will likely be bringing in the Chinese troops, or UN troops instead.

  2. Major Tom

    October 19, 2021 at 11:52 am

    “Managers may ask for proof of vaccination at any time…..”
    I remember the good old days….when we had Commanding Officers’….Leaders……not managers…..Methinks…..therein lies the problem……

  3. David Adams

    October 19, 2021 at 11:23 am

    How does this make the military a more lethal fighting force?

  4. Barbara

    October 18, 2021 at 8:01 pm

    French Senate Rejects Mandatory Vaccination, With Notable Speech by Laurence Muller-Bronn
    October 15, 2021 TLB Staff GOVERNMENT, Spotlight 0

  5. Ryun Kenney

    October 18, 2021 at 8:00 pm

    Criminal, allo them. The complicit in this crime against humanity need to be taken to the gallows immediatley

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Opinion

BRADLEY: No Central Bank Digital Currency can stack up to Bitcoin

Why Bitcoin will always be the superior digital currency.

mm

Published

on

These days, many countries are considering introducing their own Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).

The Bank of England recently released a research paper discussing the possibility of creating its own digital currency, saying it has “not yet made a decision on whether to introduce CBDC”.

In July 2021, the Bank of Canada issued a discussion paper called “The Positive Case for a CBDC”, citing it “could be an effective competition policy tool for payments” and “could also support the vibrancy of the digital economy.”

But no country is moving faster on this front than China.

The Central Bank of China has already introduced a digital yuan, which is expected to eliminate physical cash and provide a centralized payment-processing network.

As China continues to expand its CBDC implementation beyond its trial run in some cities, more of its citizens will be forced into using the government’s app to identify themselves, store their wealth and make everyday purchases. That means the Chinese government will be able to track purchases and even freeze or close personal accounts, for whatever reason they see fit.

That is a terrifying prospect – and it highlights one of the many reasons bitcoin will always be superior to any currency issued and controlled by any government.

The Bitcoin network uses blockchain technology to track the status of the network, including user balances and transactions. This allows transparency and decentralization by nature. Perhaps most importantly, this means that the system cannot be controlled or influenced by any one person, company or government.

China’s digital yuan – and any CBDC under consideration – have the complete opposite fundamentals. With a CBDC, one central bank has ultimate control and power over the currency, not to mention the ability to track and even reverse everyday purchases.

It’s a particularly worrisome situation in China, where its government has been pushing a social credit system that, at its core, rewards or punishes people for their economic and personal behaviours. As the country implements its digital yuan more broadly, there are fears China could use its CBDC to extend control over even more of its citizens’ rights and freedoms.

We don’t face that threat in western countries yet, but that’s not to say we are immune from the possibility. If Meta’s recent announcement that it’s shutting down the face recognition system on Facebook is any indication, our society is definitely not keen on being monitored, controlled, or surveilled in any way.

From 2013 to 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice ran Operation Choke Point to monitor and crack down on payments for what the government deemed “high-risk activities”, ranging from online gambling and payday loans to pornography and surveillance equipment sales. These activities were not illegal but they offended the government’s moral compass – a slippery and scary slope.

Most recently, in October 2021 U.S. President Joe Biden and his government backed down from requiring the IRS to collect data on every bank account with more than $600 in annual transactions. 

Infringements like these on our privacy are unacceptable. But the likelihood of them happening will grow exponentially if, and when, western governments introduce their own CBDCs.

Aside from a potential loss of personal freedom and privacy, CBDCs would introduce another undesirable outcome: even greater inflation than we’re experiencing today. Governments, including our own here in Canada, are printing money faster than ever, which simultaneously drives inflation and devalues personal wealth.

As Saifedean Ammous writes in his fantastic book, The Fiat Standard: The Debt Slavery Alternative to Human Civilization, “CBDCs would allow for the implementation of…inflationist schemes with high efficiency, allowing for increased central planning of market activity. Government spending would proceed unabated by whatever little discipline credit markets currently exert. Real-world prices are likely to rise, which would lead to more control over economic production to mandate prices.”

To sum this up, CBDCs could lead to higher inflation, less personal autonomy, and more government meddling. For those reasons, whenever I’m asked if the introduction of CBDCs will kill bitcoin and its relevance, my answer is a resounding, “No.”

Central bank digital currencies are not the same thing as bitcoin. They aren’t even competitors with bitcoin, nor will they ever replace bitcoin. They are a distraction. In my opinion, CBDCs will only create greater demand for bitcoin and its many advantages.

Bitcoin offers individuals the profound ability to own sound money, protect their wealth from inflation and keep governments from micro-managing their finances. That is certainly not what CBDCs will do, and it’s why we should all be very apprehensive about giving central banks the ability to issue, oversee and control digital currencies.

No CBDC can, or ever will, stack up to bitcoin.

Guest Column from Dave Bradley, Chief Revenue Officer at Bitcoin Well
@bitcoinbrains on Twitter

Sponsored by Bitcoin Well

Continue Reading

Opinion

ROYER: Canada ignores Alberta. Because it can

The only conclusion is that Canada is not a functioning, modern federal democracy. It caters almost exclusively to the needs of the two primary provinces.

mm

Published

on

Crickets. That is the sound of Canada’s response to Alberta’s request to consider revisions to the equalization program over a month ago. What does the deafening silence say about Canada?

Trudeau brushed off the referendum saying that he couldn’t unilaterally address the issue, although he clearly can. His government has several bilateral agreements with provinces other than Alberta.  He can agree to change the equalization formula to drain less wealth from Alberta and Saskatchewan in the first place.

The federal Conservative Party’s silence is due to their leader Erin O’Toole’s decision to pander to Ontario and Quebec, taking the West for granted.

The silence has made one thing absolutely clear: Alberta has no voice in Canada. Voting against the Liberals hasn’t worked. Voting in a couple of Liberal MPs hasn’t helped. Relying on protection provincial sovereignty under the constitution has proven to be useless; Trudeau’s government intercedes into those defined powers with impunity.

All that remains is to look at the big picture. Alberta had no democratic input into decisions that dramatically diminished its economy. Wealth continues to be drained from the province and it has no means to stop it. A referendum — the ultimate expression of democratic rights — is ignored. What does this make Canada?

First, it clearly is not a modern democratic nation. Modern democracies give voice to minorities and seek compromise.

We do not have a federal government. There is no structural input from the far reaches of the country in the nation’s decision-making process. It is a central government, serving only the centre.

We are not really a federation either. Rights of the lesser provinces are extinguished at the whim of the central government. Those intrusions are dutifully upheld by the Supreme Court, an institution with a majority of judges from central Canada. The Senate is completely ineffective in protecting the federation. It over-represents Quebec and Atlantic Canada, is appointed at the sole discretion of the prime minister and has very limited powers to disagree with him. Alberta’s attempt to introduce democracy into the selection of Senators has been ignored by the prime minister.

Power is extremely concentrated. Trudeau’s emissions cap on hydrocarbon production is just the most recent example. No discussion with Parliament or the provinces was taken; he just made the decision with his personal staff, and announced it

He has this power because hyper-partisanship, strict party discipline and the overly centralized government concentrates power. We’ve abandoned our historic Westminster Parliamentary system of government and taken on an American style constitutional system with judicial supremacy, but with an all-powerful prime minister that lacks the checks-and-balances placed upon an American president.

The only respectful response to Alberta came from Saskatchewan’s Premier Scott Moe. He called for his province to become a nation within a nation, a status effectively granted Quebec. Neither the federal structure nor the national parliament protect the outlying provinces. They now need to gain near national powers in order to protect themselves from the central government.

The only conclusion is Canada is not a functioning, modern federal democracy. It caters almost exclusively to the needs of the two primary provinces: Ontario and Quebec. The concentration of power and the malleability of federal sovereignties has makes the prime minister effectively an elected dictator. The only check on the prime minister’s power is in an occasional national election, the results of which are determined almost entirely in Ontario and Quebec.

So, what is Canada? It is a country in which the central provinces in conjunction with the central government have dominion over the outlying provinces, and those central provinces elect a prime minister who is given near royal prerogative.

Our country is called (at least officially) the Dominion of Canada, a constitutional monarchy. By the word dominion are we saying that the centre has dominion over the rest of the country? And does constitutional democracy say that the constitution concentrates power into the hands of a single person?

We can do better.

Randy Royer is a Western Standard columnist

Continue Reading

Energy

VENKATACHALAM & KAPLAN: Oil and gas production is essential to BC’s economy

Here’s another slice of statistical bread to consider: In 2017 the BC oil and gas industry purchased $5.6 billion worth of goods and services from other sectors.

mm

Published

on

Guest column by Ven Venkatachalam and Lennie Kaplan of the Canadian Energy Centre

British Columbia has been producing oil and natural gas since 1952. In fact, as of 2018, BC produced 32% of Canada’s natural gas production and 2% of Canada’s conventional daily oil production. British Columbia collects royalties from oil and gas development, supporting the economic prosperity in the province.

Want to know how important the oil and natural gas industry is to the BC economy? Using customized Statistic Canada data from 2017 (the latest year available for this comparison), it turns out oil and gas in BC  generated about $18 billion in outputs, consisting primarily of the value of goods and services produced, as well as a GDP of $9.5 billion.

As for what most of us can relate to — jobs — the BC oil and gas industry was responsible for nearly 26,500 direct jobs and more than 36,100 indirect jobs (62,602 jobs in total) in 2017. Also relevant: The oil and gas sector paid out over $3.1 billion in wages and salaries to BC workers that year.

Here’s another slice of statistical bread to consider: In 2017 the BC oil and gas industry purchased $5.6 billion worth of goods and services from other sectors. That included $600 million from the finance and insurance sector, $770 million in professional services, and $2.8 billion from the manufacturing sector, to name just three examples.

Spending by the oil and gas sector in BC is not the only way to consider the impact of the industry. Given that a large chunk of the oil and gas sector is next door in Alberta, let’s look at what Alberta’s trade relationship with its westerly neighbour does for BC.

BC’s interprovincial trade in total with all provinces in 2017 amounted to $39.4 billion. Alberta was responsible for the largest amount at $15.4 billion, or about 38%, of that trade.

That share of BC’s trade exports is remarkable, given that Alberta’s share of Canada’s population was just 11.5 percent in 2017. Alberta consumers, businesses and governments buy far more from BC in goods and services than its population as a share of Canada would suggest would be the case. Alberta’s capital-intensive, high-wage-paying oil and gas sector is a major reason why.

If Alberta were a country, the province’s $15.4 billion in trade with BC would come in behind only the United States (about $22.3 billion in purchases of goods and services from BC) in 2017. In fact, Alberta’s importance to B.C. exports was ranked far ahead of China ($6.9 billion), Japan ($4.5 billion), and South Korea ($2.9 billion)—the next biggest destinations for BC’s trade exports.

BC has a natural advantage for market access in some respects when compared to the United States. For instance, BC’s coast is near to many Asian-Pacific markets than are U.S. Gulf Coast facilities. The distance between the U.S. Gulf Coast and to the Japanese ports of Himeji and Sodegaura is more than 9,000 nautical miles, compared to less than 4,200 nautical miles between those two Japanese ports and the coast of BC.

The recent demand for natural gas in Asia, especially Japan (the largest importer of LNG) and price increase for natural gas, presents an exciting opportunity for BC oil and gas industry. The IEA predicts that by 2024 , natural gas demand forecast in Asia will be up 7% from 2019’s pre-COVID-19  levels. 

Be it in employment, salaries and wages paid, GDP, or the purchase of goods and services, the impact of oil and natural gas (and Alberta) on BC’s economy and trade flows is significant.

Guest column by Ven Venkatachalam and Lennie Kaplan are with the Canadian Energy Centre

Continue Reading

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Share

Petition: No Media Bailouts

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

810 signatures

No Media Bailouts

The fourth estate is critical to a functioning democracy in holding the government to account. An objective media can't maintain editorial integrity when it accepts money from a government we expect it to be critical of.

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

**your signature**



The Western Standard will never accept government bailout money. By becoming a Western Standard member, you are supporting government bailout-free and proudly western media that is on your side. With your support, we can give Westerners a voice that doesn\'t need taxpayers money.

Share this with your friends:

Trending

Copyright © Western Standard New Media Corp.