fbpx
Connect with us

News

Feds say 195 Canadians dead after getting COVID shots

The feds have set aside a $75 million compensation fund, including payment of burial expenses, for people who passed away from the shot.

mm

Published

on

A total of 195 people across the country have died after receiving a COVID-19 vaccination, says the Public Health Agency of Canada.

Blacklock’s Reporter said the PHAC is reviewing the deaths to see if vaccination were the reason.

The feds have set aside a $75 million compensation fund, including payment of burial expenses, for people who passed away from the shot.

“Although these deaths occurred after being vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine, they are not necessarily related to the vaccine,” the PHAC said in a statement.

Of the 195 fatalities reported to date, a total six were confirmed due to blood clotting, 41 were “still under investigation,” another 75 “could not be assessed due to insufficient information” and 73 were rated “unlikely linked to a COVID-19 vaccine” but warranted further review.

A total 29,091,447 Canadians have received at least one COVID-19 shot.

The PHAC said it was aware of 4,675 “adverse events following immunization reports that were serious” including 545 cases of temporary facial paralysis, 148 strokes, 126 heart attacks, 83 cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome, a rare autoimmune disorder that can cause paralysis, and 37 expectant mothers who lost their babies due to “spontaneous abortion.”

“The benefits of vaccines authorized in Canada continue to outweigh the risks,” the PHAC said in a statement.

“In the rare event a person in Canada is seriously and permanently injured as a result of vaccination, they should be fairly supported,” wrote staff.

Dr. Supirya Sharma, senior medical advisor for the health department, last December 9 said the long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines were not known.

“The benefits outweigh the potential risks, but it’s still a drug and still a vaccine and there are potential risks even if they’re rare,” said Sharma.

“That’s why we continue to monitor it.”

Continue Reading
15 Comments

15 Comments

  1. Shepherdess

    October 16, 2021 at 11:47 am

    According to VAERS, of all the DOSES given in the U.S., there were 19% adverse events reported including deaths. However, the Canadian Vaccine Safety database (https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/#seriousNonSerious) reports a mere 0.032% adverse events of all DOSES given. Seems like huge underreporting considering Canadians and Americans have the same biologic makeup. I don’t trust the Canadian reporting system at all. Furthermore it has been shown (Harvard and VAERS itself) that only about 1% (10% at best) of adverse events are even reported.

    And I had to laugh at the statement, “Dr. Supirya Sharma, senior medical advisor for the health department, last December 9 said the long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines were not known”. Wow, Dr. Sharma, could that be because there weren’t any credible studies conducted before Canadians started being injected with the gene therapy poison?!

    Regardless, this isn’t about Covid; it’s the dress rehearsal for compliance for the upcoming Great Reset and One World Government. And Canadians are exceeding expectations….

  2. Lisa

    October 16, 2021 at 10:35 am

    So if our reporting system is similar to the VAERS system, these numbers represent 1% of total adverse events! I do not believe the numbers reported are accurate regardless, as I know of too many people who have reported effects to their dctors, and the doctors refuse to connect the dots and blame the shots!

  3. Left Coast

    October 16, 2021 at 9:47 am

    MD . . . . my son brought up Covid with his wife’s Dr. a couple of weeks back.
    He is well informed and asked the Dr. about the lack of Therapeutics & bad reactions to the Vax, he knew of several. The Dr. just walked out of the room . . . it seems Cdn. Drs. are completely intimidated by the Provincial & Federal health authorities.
    The Dr. did admit that he was on a Conference Call that morning with BC Health Authorities . . . likely getting his marching orders.
    Drs. are no longer allowed to practice medicine . . . just push the Govt mantra.

    I suspect like Australia our Health Authorities are getting Millions from the Pharmaceutical Companies.

  4. MD

    October 16, 2021 at 9:16 am

    We have the most fallible system in the world. This is grossly underreported!The majority of doctors don’t even know what the adverse reaction reporting system is. Here is an example of how ignorant most doctors are today, one doctor in our town said the Pfizer vaccine is just amazing and not person died from it! My spouse told him he needs to look at VAERS. The doctor got mad, refused to have a conversation about it and walked out of the room.

  5. Claudette Leece

    October 16, 2021 at 7:48 am

    Just listened to Joe Rogan full interview with Sunjay Gupta, he admitted natural immunity is stronger than vaccine, he admitted Fauci gives misinformation, he admitted Ivermectin by percription is a valid treatment. He also admitted they don’t have data on kids being vaccinated with this. His explanation why he thinks young males get myocarditis from Covid shot, is they have such a robust immmune system, they attack the vaccine. He said kids have a robust immune system to Covid and have little illness. He stated but they can still spread disease, Joe told him so can vaccinated. In Isreal right now more vaccinated are in hospital with Covid than unvaccinated. Well worth a listen Joe Rogan had more facts about Covid then Gupta did

  6. Wigglepuppy

    October 15, 2021 at 11:43 pm

    WTH is a “spontaneous abortion”??!!! GROSS. It’s called a miscarriage. What a vulgar term for Liberals to use for something so tragic and heartbreaking for a woman to experience.

  7. Barry Williams

    October 15, 2021 at 10:47 pm

    I know two ppl with adverse affects from the jab (weird thing to call a medical procedure) and while not severe, both have said they don’t feel right.
    I don’t feel right about them not feeling right is all.

  8. CN

    October 15, 2021 at 8:02 pm

    So, 29 million doses divided by 4675 severe adverse events is 1 in ~6200 chance of a severe adverse event after a dose? Did I do my math wrong? That’s not rare at all. We don’t ask people to roll the dice like that with medical interventions. Rare is 1 in a million, or 1 in 2 million. How can health authorities rationalize this? Plus adverse events are severely under-reported. They need the specific stats analyzed for how many people got COVID given the different age groups, medical conditions etc. before they make blanket statements like “the benefit outweighs the potential risks.” Not for everybody they don’t. And not to mention any other vaccine roll out would have been pulled before 195 deaths – I can’t stand how this is somehow considered ok, particularly when they know there are early treatment protocols that will NOT cause deaths.

  9. berta baby

    October 15, 2021 at 7:33 pm

    Well if the communist party of Canada says it’s true it must be

  10. Left Coast

    October 15, 2021 at 5:06 pm

    195 people DIED . . .

    37 Babies DIED . . .

    The PHAC said it was aware of 4,675 “adverse events following immunization . . .
    how many were they not aware of?

    Over 29 Million with at least 1 shot? I suspect that is a Govt Inflated Number.

    “Dr. Supirya Sharma, senior medical advisor for the health department, last December 9 said the long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines were not known.” . . .

    Now we know what happens after 9 months . . . the VAX is wearing off and Boosters are going to be the new mantra . . . VAXED people are still carrying & shedding the Virus and many are getting Covid.

    Compared to Natural Immunity the VAX is a disaster it seems.

  11. Mars Hill

    October 15, 2021 at 5:03 pm

    Tribunals will address these deaths. Actions from here on in will decide who is addressed. We the people will remember.

  12. Baron Not Baron

    October 15, 2021 at 3:14 pm

    They forgot the zeros – 000? 0000?

  13. HeatherET

    October 15, 2021 at 2:01 pm

    I am carefully watching the Alberta numbers of new COVID cases and the percentage that are in the “complete” or “partially” vaccinated groups is steadily growing! It now at over 38%

  14. Chad Eden

    October 15, 2021 at 1:50 pm

    This isn’t rare. They have pulled drugs and vaccines for less.

  15. francis witzel

    October 15, 2021 at 1:05 pm

    I think they’ll have to beef up the fund , this is just getting started

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Sask Polytech ditches vax policy but burdens unvaxxed with testing costs

The Justice Centre is unsatisfied with the response of Sask Polytech and reiterated its intention to pursue legal action against the institution and against the University of Saskatchewan over its requirement for staff and students to be vaccinated for COVID-19.

mm

Published

on

By LEE HARDING

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is unsatisfied with the decision of Saskatchewan Polytech to reverse its vaccination requirement for staff and students because the institute does not recognize natural immunity and imposes testing costs on the unvaccinated.

On November 19, the Justice Centre sent Sask Polytech and the University of Saskatchewan letters demanding they reverse their requirement that all staff and students be vaccinated by January 1, 2022. 

On December 1, Sask Polytech reversed its “vaccinated only” policy but now requires unvaccinated staff and students to comply with testing three times a week at their own expense. In a press release, the Justice Centre called this “unacceptable.”

“Such testing requirements for students are even greater than the Saskatchewan government’s requirements for employees of its ministries. Sask Poly has also failed to recognize the compelling scientific evidence of natural immunity for those who have already recovered from Covid-19 and have proof of antibodies,” reads a JCCF press release on Saturday.

“Testing costs, which could exceed $200 per week, mean that only the wealthy and privileged can bear the burden,” stated Andre Memauri, the Justice Centre’s Saskatoon-based lawyer.

“Sask Poly, which has chosen to impose discriminatory testing requirements for staff and students, has the ability to acquire these tests at wholesale cost.”

The Justice Centre said it would commence legal proceedings against Sask Poly in the Court of Queen’s Bench unless Sask Poly immediately absorbs the testing costs and recognizes natural immunity. 

On October 28, the U of S and Sask Polytech announced mandatory vaccinations for all students, staff and faculty, removing the alternative of twice weekly testing which had been in place since the start of the school year. The Justice Centre will also commence legal action against the U of S for refusing unvaccinated students. 

On November 26, Global News reported a 19-year-old student was hospitalized briefly with breathing problems after receiving the Johnson and Johnson vaccine. The student’s mother, Michelle Marciniuk, publicly called for the university to reconsider its policy.

The U of S’ policy includes exemptions on medical and religious grounds in accordance with the Saskatchewan Human Rights Code. But according to the Justice Centre, the university usually rejects exemption requests or does not respond to them for several weeks. Besides this, the university has made itself the arbiter of faith considerations for religious exemptions. Medical exemptions have become a difficult document for patients to receive in Canada, due to regulatory pressure on physicians not to provide them based on their medical judgement except in very rare circumstances.

The U of S crowns itself for academic freedom, diversity, equality, human dignity and a healthy work and learning environment, yet it has harshly terminated faculty for speaking on the hallmark principle of informed consent for Covid-19 vaccination of children,” stated Andre Memauri, a U of S alum. 

“Now, the U of S seeks to exclude and villainize those who decide for various reasons not to be vaccinated…Without question, our community has been through a great deal of difficulty and it requires these institutions to lead as vessels of science not ideology…The Justice Centre demands both schools follow the science and adopt policies that bring students together in the most safe and lawful manner.”

The letters sent to both schools from the Justice Centre on November 19 warned that the schools are seeking to deprive students from education on the basis of vaccination status, contrary to Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Sections 2(a), 7, and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Harding is a Western Standard contributor based in Saskatchewan

Continue Reading

News

CRA wants more tax filers to file online

The government’s own research shows millions of paper filers resist change.

mm

Published

on

The taxman is angry that too many Canadians are still filing by mail, says Blacklock’s Reporter.

The government’s own research shows millions of paper filers resist change.

“Those who submit their taxes by mail most often say they use paper rather than filing electronically because it is simply how they prefer to do it, e.g. they do it out of habit, because ‘it’s what they are comfortable with,’ they like it, etcetera,” said a Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) report.

“Just 13% cite security issues.”

Data show of 30.5 million tax returns filed this year a total 2.7 million or 9% were filed on paper. Millions of taxpayers, a total 4,234,772 including Internet filers, demanded refunds be paid by mailed cheque instead of direct deposit.

The CRA complained it would be “more timely and efficient” if all taxpayers used the Internet. The Agency spends $6.9 million annually mailing T1 general tax forms alone.

“There is still a sizable proportion of taxpayers who are conducting their business with the Canada Revenue Agency through paper rather than taking advantage of digital services which are much more timely and efficient,” said the report.

Research showed typical paper filers were working age men under 55 who completed their own return without a tax preparer, had a university degree, earned more than $80,000 a year and were more likely than other Canadians to prefer in-person teller service rather than online banking.

“The most important factor influencing why respondents file by paper instead of online is disinterest,” wrote researchers, who added: “Apathy is a barrier. Fifty percent of likely switchers say they are simply not interested in switching. Therefore the agency will have to demonstrate the value of switching.”

Findings were based on questionnaires with 2,000 taxpayers who filed returns by mail. The Agency paid Earnscliffe Strategy Group $130,061 for the survey.

The research follows a failed 2012 campaign to have all Canadians use direct deposit for payment of tax refunds and benefit cheques. The attempt by the Receiver General of Canada, the federal office responsible for processing payments, was intended to save costs. Paper cheques cost 82¢ apiece to process compared to 13¢ for electronic transfers, by official estimate.

An estimated 13% of taxpayers refused to surrender bank account information to the Receiver General. “Cheque recipients have become harder to engage,” said a 2020 Department of Public Works survey.

“A few have a general distrust of the Government of Canada’s ability to protect data,” wrote researchers. A total 23 percent of Atlantic residents said they wouldn’t rely on the government to protect their privacy, followed by 22% in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, 21% in Ontario, 19% in Alberta, 18% in BC and 12% in Québec.

Continue Reading

News

WATCH: Alberta Oil drives Guilbeault to meeting with Nixon

Federal Environment Minister Stephen Guilbeault’s tour of Alberta has already kicked off with a whiff of hypocrisy.

mm

Published

on

Attended by a sizable entourage, Guilbeault exited his black gasoline-powered SUV and hustled into the McDougall Centre in Calgary for a meeting with Alberta Environment Minister Jason Nixon.  

Guilbeault has dedicated most of his career to telling Canadians they need to transition from petrochemically fueled transportation. During this meeting though, Guilbeault chose not to find an utilize an electric-powered SUV in order to demonstrate his environmental virtue. With the resources of the entire federal government behind him, one would have thought that Guilbeault could have arranged appropriate transportation for his cross-Canada tour.  

It’s almost as if electric vehicles are still not ready for mainstream use yet. 

At least Guilbeault contributed to the Western economy with his conspicuous consumption of local petrochemical products.  

Continue Reading

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Share

Petition: No Media Bailouts

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

810 signatures

No Media Bailouts

The fourth estate is critical to a functioning democracy in holding the government to account. An objective media can't maintain editorial integrity when it accepts money from a government we expect it to be critical of.

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

**your signature**



The Western Standard will never accept government bailout money. By becoming a Western Standard member, you are supporting government bailout-free and proudly western media that is on your side. With your support, we can give Westerners a voice that doesn\'t need taxpayers money.

Share this with your friends:

Trending

Copyright © Western Standard New Media Corp.