Connect with us


Trudeau tries to fix housing market by stealing page from old Conservative playbook

Ironically, Trudeau and his cabinet kiboshed a Conservative motion in the Commons June 9 proposing very similar sanctions.




Prime Minister Justin Trudeau hopes regulating the housing market will help average, hard-working citizens achieve the Canadian Dream, says Blacklock’s Reporter.

On behalf of the Liberal cabinet, Trudeau promised if re-elected to ban all new foreign purchases of Canadian residential real estate for a minimum of two years.

Ironically, Trudeau and his cabinet kiboshed a Conservative motion in the Commons June 9 proposing very similar sanctions.

Trudeau promised to “crack down” on factors influencing the Canadian housing market to be one of the most expensive in the world. “No more blind bidding. No more foreign wealth being parked in homes that people should be living in.

“The deck seems stacked against people and has for an awfully long time,” Trudeau said.

In a new document released by the Liberal Party titled A Home For Everyone, the Liberals say they will “ban new foreign ownership of Canadian houses for the next two years” to ensure local citizens have realistic access to purchasing homes in the nation.

On June 9 Commons voted 180-147 for a motion recommending cabinet investigate a “temporary freeze on home purchases by non-resident foreign buyers who are squeezing Canadians out of the housing market.”

While the Conservatives, Bloc, and NDP’s supported this motion, Liberal members and the entire Liberal cabinet opposed it.

The Liberal Party said in a statement August 24 it plans to also implement a “Home Buyer’s Bill of Rights” to help make the home-buying process easier and more fair. The plan intends to eliminate blind bidding.

While many, especially the BC provincial government that’s in the process of attempting to fix their housing market problems through provincial foreign property ownership taxation of their own, some don’t agree with the government’s Band-Aid solution.

David Oikle, president of the Ontario Real Estate Association, said “you cannot fix Canada’s housing crisis by denying millions of hardworking families the choice of how to sell their homes by regulating real estate prices.”

Currently, private contracts are provincially legislated through the Constitution Act. Trudeau provided no details on any legalities regarding his bid-regulation proposal.

Trudeau hopes this legislation can help average citizens achieve the Canadian Dream, saying to reporters “if you word hard, if you save, your dream of having your own place should be in reach. For too many people it just isn’t and that’s not right.”

“It’s time for things to change,” said Trudeau. “You shouldn’t lose a bidding war on your home to speculators.”

In a further attempt to even the housing market playing field, the Home document also referenced an “unspecified slipping tax” that would be incurred on properties which changed ownership within twelve months of originally purchasing.

Effective January 1, cabinet will “levy a 1% annual equity tax on unoccupied condos, townhouses, and single-family homes owned by non-resident foreigners.” The Budget Office estimates the tax is worth $175 million per year.

Jackie Conroy is a reporter for the Western Standard

Continue Reading
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Steven

    August 25, 2021 at 2:00 pm

    Justin Trudeau’s money acumen is about 0 out of 10.

    1. Justin says: “Budgets balance themselves”
    2. Justin says: “Not interested in monetary policy” &
    3. Justin spends like a drunken sailor. However, not with his own money, but with taxpayers money. His own money he keeps safe & well hidden.

    Trudeau is as fake as they come. The only thing propping Justin up are his good looks and nice hair.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply


Sask Polytech ditches vax policy but burdens unvaxxed with testing costs

The Justice Centre is unsatisfied with the response of Sask Polytech and reiterated its intention to pursue legal action against the institution and against the University of Saskatchewan over its requirement for staff and students to be vaccinated for COVID-19.





The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is unsatisfied with the decision of Saskatchewan Polytech to reverse its vaccination requirement for staff and students because the institute does not recognize natural immunity and imposes testing costs on the unvaccinated.

On November 19, the Justice Centre sent Sask Polytech and the University of Saskatchewan letters demanding they reverse their requirement that all staff and students be vaccinated by January 1, 2022. 

On December 1, Sask Polytech reversed its “vaccinated only” policy but now requires unvaccinated staff and students to comply with testing three times a week at their own expense. In a press release, the Justice Centre called this “unacceptable.”

“Such testing requirements for students are even greater than the Saskatchewan government’s requirements for employees of its ministries. Sask Poly has also failed to recognize the compelling scientific evidence of natural immunity for those who have already recovered from Covid-19 and have proof of antibodies,” reads a JCCF press release on Saturday.

“Testing costs, which could exceed $200 per week, mean that only the wealthy and privileged can bear the burden,” stated Andre Memauri, the Justice Centre’s Saskatoon-based lawyer.

“Sask Poly, which has chosen to impose discriminatory testing requirements for staff and students, has the ability to acquire these tests at wholesale cost.”

The Justice Centre said it would commence legal proceedings against Sask Poly in the Court of Queen’s Bench unless Sask Poly immediately absorbs the testing costs and recognizes natural immunity. 

On October 28, the U of S and Sask Polytech announced mandatory vaccinations for all students, staff and faculty, removing the alternative of twice weekly testing which had been in place since the start of the school year. The Justice Centre will also commence legal action against the U of S for refusing unvaccinated students. 

On November 26, Global News reported a 19-year-old student was hospitalized briefly with breathing problems after receiving the Johnson and Johnson vaccine. The student’s mother, Michelle Marciniuk, publicly called for the university to reconsider its policy.

The U of S’ policy includes exemptions on medical and religious grounds in accordance with the Saskatchewan Human Rights Code. But according to the Justice Centre, the university usually rejects exemption requests or does not respond to them for several weeks. Besides this, the university has made itself the arbiter of faith considerations for religious exemptions. Medical exemptions have become a difficult document for patients to receive in Canada, due to regulatory pressure on physicians not to provide them based on their medical judgement except in very rare circumstances.

The U of S crowns itself for academic freedom, diversity, equality, human dignity and a healthy work and learning environment, yet it has harshly terminated faculty for speaking on the hallmark principle of informed consent for Covid-19 vaccination of children,” stated Andre Memauri, a U of S alum. 

“Now, the U of S seeks to exclude and villainize those who decide for various reasons not to be vaccinated…Without question, our community has been through a great deal of difficulty and it requires these institutions to lead as vessels of science not ideology…The Justice Centre demands both schools follow the science and adopt policies that bring students together in the most safe and lawful manner.”

The letters sent to both schools from the Justice Centre on November 19 warned that the schools are seeking to deprive students from education on the basis of vaccination status, contrary to Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Sections 2(a), 7, and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Harding is a Western Standard contributor based in Saskatchewan

Continue Reading


CRA wants more tax filers to file online

The government’s own research shows millions of paper filers resist change.




The taxman is angry that too many Canadians are still filing by mail, says Blacklock’s Reporter.

The government’s own research shows millions of paper filers resist change.

“Those who submit their taxes by mail most often say they use paper rather than filing electronically because it is simply how they prefer to do it, e.g. they do it out of habit, because ‘it’s what they are comfortable with,’ they like it, etcetera,” said a Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) report.

“Just 13% cite security issues.”

Data show of 30.5 million tax returns filed this year a total 2.7 million or 9% were filed on paper. Millions of taxpayers, a total 4,234,772 including Internet filers, demanded refunds be paid by mailed cheque instead of direct deposit.

The CRA complained it would be “more timely and efficient” if all taxpayers used the Internet. The Agency spends $6.9 million annually mailing T1 general tax forms alone.

“There is still a sizable proportion of taxpayers who are conducting their business with the Canada Revenue Agency through paper rather than taking advantage of digital services which are much more timely and efficient,” said the report.

Research showed typical paper filers were working age men under 55 who completed their own return without a tax preparer, had a university degree, earned more than $80,000 a year and were more likely than other Canadians to prefer in-person teller service rather than online banking.

“The most important factor influencing why respondents file by paper instead of online is disinterest,” wrote researchers, who added: “Apathy is a barrier. Fifty percent of likely switchers say they are simply not interested in switching. Therefore the agency will have to demonstrate the value of switching.”

Findings were based on questionnaires with 2,000 taxpayers who filed returns by mail. The Agency paid Earnscliffe Strategy Group $130,061 for the survey.

The research follows a failed 2012 campaign to have all Canadians use direct deposit for payment of tax refunds and benefit cheques. The attempt by the Receiver General of Canada, the federal office responsible for processing payments, was intended to save costs. Paper cheques cost 82¢ apiece to process compared to 13¢ for electronic transfers, by official estimate.

An estimated 13% of taxpayers refused to surrender bank account information to the Receiver General. “Cheque recipients have become harder to engage,” said a 2020 Department of Public Works survey.

“A few have a general distrust of the Government of Canada’s ability to protect data,” wrote researchers. A total 23 percent of Atlantic residents said they wouldn’t rely on the government to protect their privacy, followed by 22% in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, 21% in Ontario, 19% in Alberta, 18% in BC and 12% in Québec.

Continue Reading


WATCH: Alberta Oil drives Guilbeault to meeting with Nixon

Federal Environment Minister Stephen Guilbeault’s tour of Alberta has already kicked off with a whiff of hypocrisy.




Attended by a sizable entourage, Guilbeault exited his black gasoline-powered SUV and hustled into the McDougall Centre in Calgary for a meeting with Alberta Environment Minister Jason Nixon.  

Guilbeault has dedicated most of his career to telling Canadians they need to transition from petrochemically fueled transportation. During this meeting though, Guilbeault chose not to find an utilize an electric-powered SUV in order to demonstrate his environmental virtue. With the resources of the entire federal government behind him, one would have thought that Guilbeault could have arranged appropriate transportation for his cross-Canada tour.  

It’s almost as if electric vehicles are still not ready for mainstream use yet. 

At least Guilbeault contributed to the Western economy with his conspicuous consumption of local petrochemical products.  

Continue Reading

Recent Posts

Recent Comments


Petition: No Media Bailouts

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

810 signatures

No Media Bailouts

The fourth estate is critical to a functioning democracy in holding the government to account. An objective media can't maintain editorial integrity when it accepts money from a government we expect it to be critical of.

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

**your signature**

The Western Standard will never accept government bailout money. By becoming a Western Standard member, you are supporting government bailout-free and proudly western media that is on your side. With your support, we can give Westerners a voice that doesn\'t need taxpayers money.

Share this with your friends:


Copyright © Western Standard New Media Corp.