Connect with us


Wagner: It’s time for Alberta to have its own national holiday

“Despite the problem of determining the most effective day for an Alberta national holiday, the idea has merit. Like Quebecers, most Albertans have a patriotic attachment to their province.”




The recent discovery of hundreds of unmarked graves at the sites of former residential schools set off a national debate about whether Canada Day should be celebrated in 2021, or even ever. Many saw the national shame of the residential schools as a compelling reason to cancel national celebrations, while others argued despite Canada’s shortcomings, it was still a nation worth celebrating. 

In a particularly helpful column on this topic, Jen Gerson discusses the deeper significance of national days and other symbolic elements that represent “national mythology.” Every country has a common story that ties its citizens together. That story – what’s known as the “national mythology” – is reinforced through reminders, such as statues of major figures in the story, and holidays to celebrate its key milestones. 

Thus, as Gerson rightly notes, tearing down statues and cancelling Canada Day celebrations “are strikes against our unifying national mythology.” 

She expands on the significance of a common story.

“All national mythologies, symbols, and holidays are necessary lies. Patriotism is a bullshit fantasy that holds disparate tribes and interests together into a single cohesive national identity that is sometimes capable of working in unison for the pursuit of some notion of a greater good.” 

In other words, a community’s common story and the symbols that represent the story help to bind the community together.

This point is well-understood by Quebec nationalists. In 1925, June 24 (Saint-Jean-Baptiste Day) was made a legal holiday in Quebec. However, in 1977, under René Lévesque’s Parti Québécois government, its symbolic status was dramatically upgraded when it was declared to be the “Fête nationale” or a national holiday of Quebec.

According to a web page entitled The National Holiday of Quebec, Pierre Trudeau’s federal government responded to Lévesque’s declaration by deliberately enhancing the importance of July 1 for all of Canada: “Until the 1970s, Dominion Day, which fell on July 1st, was little more than a day off for most Canadians; the major holiday was Victoria Day. To respond to the Quebec nationalists’ promotion of Saint-Jean-Baptiste Day, the federal government began pushing July 1st as a national holiday for Canada. It did so by changing the name of the holiday to Canada Day [away from Dominion Day] and increasing the funds available for its celebration.” 

That is, there was a kind of “war of national days,” with the federal government trying to counter the efforts of Lévesque’s provincial government to make Quebec’s national day more significant. It was recognized by both sides that national holidays matter. Their symbolic meaning transcends the experience of citizens just having a day off. And the significance of the symbolic meaning of national holidays is reflected in the current debate over Canada Day.

With that in mind, it seems reasonable that Alberta should have some sort of annual holiday as well, much like Quebec has Saint-Jean-Baptiste Day on June 24. Following the example set by the Quebec government, the Alberta government could initiate an annual holiday to celebrate the province’s accomplishments and strengthen Albertans’ sense of unique identity. 

Of course, if that idea were embraced, the immediate problem would be: which day should Albertans celebrate? 

Because Alberta was created on September 1, 1905, that date would seem to be the most obvious candidate. The problem, though, is it’s so close to Labour Day (the first Monday of September) it has essentially been pre-empted. Indeed, the legendary Byfield family of Alberta Report (predecessor of the Western Standard) would celebrate Labour Day as “Alberta Day.” 

Another candidate would be February 13, 1947, the day oil was discovered near Leduc. That discovery changed the province forever. The problem with this date, though, is it’s in the middle of winter and has been pre-empted by Family Day. Mid-February is not particularly conducive for backyard barbecues and cold patio beers.

Some might favour the first day of the Calgary Stampede, which is normally the first Friday of July. Many Calgarians already treat it as a holiday, and most of the makings of a big celebration from fireworks to parades are already in place. Edmontonians, however, might be less enthusiastic about focusing a celebration of Alberta around the famous southern shindig. 

Despite the problem of determining the most effective day for an Alberta national holiday, the idea has merit. Like Quebecers, most Albertans have a patriotic attachment to their province. 

Declaring an Alberta holiday would strengthen that attachment by celebrating it on an annual basis. It would reinforce what Gerson describes as the “single cohesive national identity” that helps tie people together in the pursuit of a common good. In a time of division and political conflict, an annual holiday could remind Albertans of the great province they all enjoy together.

Michael Wagner is a Senior Columnist for the Western Standard

Michael Wagner is a Senior Alberta Columnist for the Western Standard. He has a PhD in political science from the University of Alberta. His books include 'Alberta: Separatism Then and Now' and 'True Right: Genuine Conservative Leaders of Western Canada.' mwagner@westernstandardonline.com

Continue Reading


  1. Andrew

    July 3, 2021 at 8:41 pm

    Alberta Independence Day!

  2. Baron Not Baron

    July 2, 2021 at 2:44 pm

    Yes, July 1st is great. Sounds good – 3 days AHEAD of the local..rest.

  3. num4lizard@hotmail.com

    July 2, 2021 at 1:23 pm

    There isn’t a stat holiday in June. That is a lovely, warm month that is just crying out for a holiday. Let’s aim to have our independence declared in June.

  4. Left Coast

    July 2, 2021 at 9:55 am

    Alberta Independence Day . . . how about July 4, we could celebrate with our cousins & likely new best friends south of the 49th.

    I lived in Edmonton in the 70s worked for the Journal . . . was a good time.

    I have been a Western Separatist for over 40 years . . . grew up in Winnipeg, my mother who grew up on a farm in Manitoba and spent time in the East with my father during the 40s always said the Eastern Folks in Kingston she dealt with were different. She was not impressed. Descendants of United Empire Loyalists I suspect . . .

    Some of my buddies went East, but I went West and to this day am thankful . . .

    If the West separates & BC is not onboard I know just how to rectify that situation . . . already watching Real Estate outside Calgary.

  5. Dennis

    July 2, 2021 at 7:24 am

    Right on Baron, the day Alberta becomes a Sovereign Nation. Wildrose.party

  6. foralta

    July 1, 2021 at 2:56 pm

  7. LisaEh

    July 1, 2021 at 1:38 pm

    It’s time for Alberta to exit this dumpster fire called Canada. Sovereignty now!

  8. Baron Not Baron

    July 1, 2021 at 12:20 pm

    How about Alberta day? YES. But I can’t have soon enough Alberta Independence Day !!!

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply


McCAFFREY: Don’t let Calgary ruin the region

Central planning doesn’t work and the current government should reverse this mistake as soon as possible by abolishing the Calgary Metropolitan Region Board and allowing municipalities to return to cooperating on a voluntary basis.



The Calgary Metropolitan Region Board (CMRB) was created in 2015 by the NDP government to control planning and development for the entirety of the Calgary region. 

Since then, this unelected body has been working on creating a new growth plan for the region that contains some of the most radical changes to development and planning rules ever proposed in Alberta.

With the enactment of this growth plan, the CMRB is set to become what will effectively be a fourth level of government for citizens of the Calgary region and will allow Calgary to export its bad policies across all the other municipalities of the region.

Yet barely anyone in the Calgary region has even heard of the board.

How is it possible a new level of government could be introduced without anyone noticing?

Well, in part, that’s thanks to a very deliberate effort by the former NDP government, and the board itself, to keep the powers and potential wide-ranging influence of the board as below the radar as possible for as long as possible.

The board, at least according to its designers, is simply meant to help manage planning and development issues, in order to help manage the significant population growth that the Calgary region is expected to experience in the coming decades.

Make no mistake about it, though, the CMRB and its growth plan do much more than this.

The entire growth plan is based on the philosophy that a small group of people, in this case, bureaucrats and city planners—particularly in Calgary—can do a better job planning and managing population and employment growth than the free market can.

The central planners believe the challenges of growth are better addressed by forcing the municipalities in the Calgary region to cooperate rather than compete to provide these services and facilities.

Rather than merely permitting cooperation between municipalities as claimed, however, the creation of the CMRB and the implementation of the growth plan actually forces Calgary and the surrounding municipalities to cooperate on many issues, even when this goes against the wishes of the municipalities and their residents.

Requiring municipalities to cooperate even if they believe it’s against their and their residents’ interests to do so is bound to lead to less fair and less equitable outcomes for the whole of the Calgary region.

Even worse, the forced co-operation doesn’t go both ways.

Despite claims the board is based on cooperation, the 10-member municipalities are being forced to participate in the organization, they cannot leave, and the voting system of the board effectively gives a veto to the Calgary on every issue.

In effect, this puts Calgary politicians and bureaucrats in charge of planning and development for the entire region, as without Calgary’s approval, no plan or development can go ahead.

This is no accident, the board was very deliberately created to do exactly this.

For years, Calgary has pursued bad public policies that have increased rules, regulations, red tape, and taxes on businesses and residents of Calgary.

The situation has become so dire that now many businesses and residents are leaving Calgary entirely and setting up their operations and family lives outside of the city in one of the many surrounding municipalities, where regulations and taxes are lighter.

Essentially, Calgary has become noncompetitive with other municipalities in the region, but planners in Calgary don’t see this as a problem, rather they see it as an opportunity.

But Calgary didn’t want to fix the problem by cutting red tape, getting taxes and spending under control, and working to become competitive again.

Rather, the city lobbied the provincial government to help them out by giving Calgary the power to impose the same high levels of regulations across the entire region—essentially killing off the competition.

It was perhaps not surprising that the former NDP government was willing to give Calgary this power, as the NDP government do not understand or believe in the benefits of free market competition to begin with.

But the current Alberta government has repeatedly stated its core focus is on reducing red tape and unleashing Alberta’s economy. They have put significant effort into achieving this goal in many other policy areas.

Yet, when it comes to regional planning they have, so far at least, permitted the exact opposite to continue.

Rather than reducing red tape and regulation to get the Calgary region’s economy going, in almost every policy area the growth plan goes in completely the other direction and essentially centralizes planning decisions for the entire region.

All types of development—single family houses, row houses, apartments, shopping malls, retail stores, manufacturing, warehouses, agricultural services, and more—will now have to be approved not only by the local municipality but also by an unelected board dominated by Calgary.

Thrown out the window is any concept of the free market, individual choice, property rights, competition and, frankly, basic economics.

This dramatic centralization will impose a series of significant direct and indirect costs on the economy of the Calgary region, none of which are considered by the CMRB in its growth plan.

These costs include the millions of dollars spent creating and operating what is effectively a fourth level of government, the significant costs to Calgary businesses, residents, and the economy as a result of this extra bureaucracy, the dramatic costs that would be incurred by projects being reduced, relocated, or cancelled under the growth plan, as well as indirect and intangible costs.

The plan also runs roughshod over local democracy in the member municipalities, and over the property rights of the residents of those municipalities.

What, exactly, is the point of electing a local council in your district or town, if planning and development rules—until now one of the most important tasks of a local government—will now be controlled centrally by an unelected board?

Worse yet, this move from voluntary cooperation to forced cooperation will not solve the very problems the CMRB and the growth plan were designed to fix.

The end result of a growth plan that replaces voluntary cooperation and competition with forced collaboration will be higher taxes and higher fees, more regulation and red tape, increased housing and infrastructure costs, less efficient delivery of utilities and services, and worse environmental outcomes for the entire region.

There are far better ways to accommodate future population growth in the Calgary region than via a top-down, centrally controlled regional growth plan that violates the values that made Alberta what it is today: individual freedom, personal choice, fiscal responsibility, property rights, and a free market built on competition rather than government diktat.

The proposed growth plan would block billions of dollars of investment, redirect billions more out of the Calgary region, and cost tens of thousands of jobs. This is the exact opposite of what the Calgary region needs right now.

The CMRB, and the requirement for them to create a growth plan to control development in the region, were an ideological creation of the former provincial government, based on the idea that top-down central planning is the best way to run an economy.

Central planning doesn’t work and the current government should reverse this mistake as soon as possible by abolishing the CMRB and allowing municipalities to return to cooperating on a voluntary basis.

Peter McCaffrey is the President of the Alberta Institute, an independent, libertarian-minded, public policy think tank that aims to advance personal freedom and choice in Alberta.

The Alberta Institute has prepared an academic research paper outlining the history of regional planning in the Calgary Region, and looking at the implications of the Calgary Metropolitan Region Board on jobs, investment and democracy for Alberta.

Continue Reading


Krahnicle’s Cartoon: September 17, 2021




Continue Reading


MORGAN: It’s time for Kenney to resign

“I say this regretfully, but it’s time for Jason Kenney to resign as premier of Alberta and as the leader of the United Conservative Party. I wish things had ended differently.”




Premier Jason Kenney gambled and lost.

His move to declare Alberta as being permanently open for business was a hail-Mary pass for a beleaguered government and it has failed in the worst possible way.

Alberta is in the midst of a health care crisis, deaths are on the rise and we are entering a new period of mandatory vaccine passports, lockdowns, and other restrictions.

I say this regretfully, but it’s time for Jason Kenney to resign as premier of Alberta and as the leader of the United Conservative Party.

I had the highest of hopes for Kenney. I was enthusiastic as he won multiple leadership races and merged the previously intransigent Wildrose and Progressive Conservative parties. I was thrilled when Rachel Notley’s NDP government was trounced in the general election. I thought we’d be looking forward to some steady, competent, conservative governance for at least a couple of election cycles.

I was wrong. Boy, was I ever wrong.

Love him or hate him, Jason Kenney is undeniably one of the brightest and hardest working politicians in Canada. He worked his way from advocacy into elected office and then became a respected cabinet minister in a number of portfolios. It appears Kenney met his match when it comes to the party and provincial leadership. He has managed to alienate both the left and the right within the province and I don’t see how he can recover from this.

Kenney’s leadership woes were already appearing well before the COVID-19 pandemic appeared on the scene. The shotgun marriage of the Wildrose Party and the Progressive Conservatives was showing cracks as caucus infighting began to smolder. The pandemic crisis exacerbated the issue and Kenney is now heading up a deeply divided caucus with multiple members having been tossed out of the party or disciplined. This inability to manage his own caucus has shaken the confidence Albertans had in Kenney to manage the province.

The Kenney government has been noteworthy for setting high targets and then failing to move toward them. The Fair Deal panel appeared to be an act of deferral, rather than an exercise to build a stronger, more independent province.

Kenney refused to take strong actions against Ottawa despite the open hostility shown to Alberta by the Trudeau government. This has fed the theory Kenney is using Alberta as a stepping stone towards pursuing a federal run. We can safely say Kenney’s federal career is finished at this point.

It seems that everything Kenney has touches turns to scheiße. The energy “war room” has turned into a running joke and with long and constant delays on its launch. The Allen Report examining groups that attack Alberta’s energy sector has been a waste of time. Energy producers seeking a sense of confidence in Alberta have been left disappointed.

In picking a battle with Alberta’s doctors and nurses, Kenney has drawn fire from all sides of the political spectrum. While there certainly is room to reexamine the agreements with health care providers, it has to be done carefully and with strong leadership. The UCP has appeared ham-handed and virtually leaderless on the issue.

The Kenney government has become election fodder used to hammer the O’Toole Conservatives on the federal front. The UCP looks so inept and unpopular that Trudeau is using it to attack O’Toole, and O’Toole hides from any association with Kenney.

Politicians are by nature self-interested beings. Caucus members within the UCP are surely weighing their options as the Kenney government continues to crash and burn in public opinion. With less than two years to go before the next provincial election comes, they know the window for getting rid of Kenney is closing quickly. The only hope the UCP has of winning the next election is to get a new leader and show some sign of new direction, and soon.

Rumblings from caucus are soon going to become a roar.

There are two options for the UCP right now. They can keep Kenney into the next election and most likely hand Rachel Notley a second NDP term, or they can get on with finding a new leader and reconnecting with Albertans. The UCP now is simply too wildly unpopular to regain the trust of the electorate under Kenney’s leadership.

I still respect Jason Kenney and appreciate what he did on the federal front, along with his efforts to unite conservatives in Alberta. I would like to see Kenney retain what dignity he can by resigning for the sake of Alberta and his party. It would hurt his pride, but it still would be a better end to a political career than being kicked out by his own caucus, or by the electorate in a general election. His “best summer ever” strategy failed and it’s time to face the music.

I wish things had ended differently.

Cory Morgan is the Alberta Political Columnist for the Western Standard and Host of the Cory Morgan Show

Continue Reading

Recent Posts

Recent Comments


Petition: No Media Bailouts

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

343 signatures

No Media Bailouts

The fourth estate is critical to a functioning democracy in holding the government to account. An objective media can't maintain editorial integrity when it accepts money from a government we expect it to be critical of.

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

**your signature**

The Western Standard will never accept government bailout money. By becoming a Western Standard member, you are supporting government bailout-free and proudly western media that is on your side. With your support, we can give Westerners a voice that doesn\'t need taxpayers money.

Share this with your friends:


Copyright © Western Standard New Media Corp.