Connect with us


LOEWEN: Inside the train wreck of Kenney’s premiership

Todd Loewen gives an insider’s view into how he believes Kenney’s government went off the rails.




It’s a political train wreck. 

If a provincial election were held today, the UCP government would be sent packing to the opposition benches and the NDP would be returned to power with a majority. Such a scenario seemed impossible just two short years ago. However, since that time, Premier Kenney has steadily failed to deliver when it comes to key promises. Instead, the premier has delivered record deficits, debt soaring past $100,000,000,000, and a host of pandemic management failures.

Is it any wonder that Jason Kenney – the man who once declared his own victory a “miracle on the prairies” – is now the least popular premier in all of Canada?

Behind closed doors

As bad as this government appears from the outside, the situation is even worse behind closed doors. I know. I had a front row seat.

Following the 2019 election, I was chosen by my fellow MLAs to serve as the chair of the UCP Caucus. I considered it an honour. Fresh off a winning campaign, our members were greatly looking forward to working with a government that was committed to grassroots democracy. However, it soon became apparent that our leader had a much different idea of how democracy should work.

To use a sports analogy, caucus was immediately benched. Like Premier Redford before him, Premier Kenney showed no real interest in listening to MLAs or adopting their input. Rather than allowing MLAs to keep the government accountable, Kenney and some of his inner circle took an adversarial approach. 

I can give you numerous examples of dysfunction, and virtually all of them come back to the failures of one man: Premier Kenney. He proved incapable of accepting constructive criticism, and often verbally attacked MLAs who offered alternatives. On several occasions those who spoke up were called to the “principal’s office” (i.e., Kenney’s Whip’s office) and lectured. Worse yet, he once berated one of my female colleagues to tears. In my opinion, that crosses a line. Real leaders do not resort to such authoritarian tactics.

Unwilling to accept input, the premier started employing procedural and filibuster tactics against his own caucus. Rather than allowing me to set agendas for meetings according to the will of the MLAs, he transferred control to a committee he chaired. Very little time was allowed for MLAs to speak in caucus, preventing many from speaking on important issues. On multiple occasions, without providing an explanation, Caucus meetings were cancelled altogether. 

It falls apart

As all of this was going on behind closed doors, the government’s self-inflicted wounds continued to multiply. It became apparent to a growing segment of Albertans that this government had stopped listening. The consequences are undeniable. The UCP continues to lose members, including provincial and local board members. Donations have dried up. Lifelong conservative volunteers walked away. 

Frustrated MLAs kept coming to me, pleading for an opportunity to truly represent their constituents. Try as I might, the premier refused to budge. Out of options, I attempted to snap this government out of its stupor by publicly stepping down as caucus chair and calling for new leadership. The premier, unwilling to accept accountability in any form, chose to shoot the messenger. At the next caucus meeting he went on the attack, ranting and raving in a fashion that portrayed both insecurity and paranoia.

Epilogue for a premier

In the weeks following my departure from the UCP Caucus, the situation only grew worse. The Sky Palace patio scandal clearly illustrated for the public what many insiders already knew. Even caught red handed violating his own health restrictions, the premier refused to accept accountability or responsibility for his actions. 

Albertans have now seen him for who he really is, and there is no going back. While the last provincial election in Alberta was a referendum on Premier Notley’s performance, it is clear that the next election will be all about one man: Jason Kenney.

Regardless of what he does from this point forward, the premier’s best days are behind him. Moving forward, I truly believe we can get this train back on the track. 

But, first things first, we need a new conductor. 

Guest Column from Todd Loewen, Alberta MLA for Central Peace-Notley

Continue Reading


  1. Dave Symington

    July 8, 2021 at 8:40 am

    Albertans need to face the facts. Conservatives have betrayed this province too long. If the NDP get in it’s going to 4 years HELL. “Wildrose maybe our only hope for the future”.

  2. Dennis

    July 8, 2021 at 7:42 am

    How long will it take for Albertans to realize that it’s time to make a complete change in Alberta government. Alberta needs a government that works for Alberta and Albertans, not one that bends over for Ottawa. And that folks is what we have had for the past decade or more. UCP/NDP, they have allowed Ottawa to dictate the rules of the game.
    Albertans must stand up and vote for a NEW way of thinking in 2023. Go to wildrose.party, educate yourself, become a member, make a donation, get involved with your local CA. The time has come to get off your ass and DO SOMETHING. Enough whining and bitching, let’s DO this!

  3. Matt C

    July 7, 2021 at 10:38 pm

    Kenney is cowed by the media/establishment hype machine. He is clearly not up to the challenge.

  4. Steven

    July 7, 2021 at 9:55 pm

    You are a Jerk Mervin !! What the hell do you think Todd Loewen, Alberta MLA for Central Peace-Notley was doing bringing Kenney’s betrayal to light. The UCP is a stinking pile of cow turd with Jason Kenney as it’s leader Mervin. Kenney’s whip MLA Ellis needs a good whipping himself.

    I’d say to you Marvin, you get off your ass & help make the changes needed or better yet move over for the Wildrose Independence Party of Alberta to set things right. Kenney is no Conservative, but he is a bigger pain in the ass then most Albertans wanted as their leader.

  5. Mervin

    July 7, 2021 at 3:39 pm

    If what you say is true, then quit making trouble and fix it. Become part of the solution. Because if the NDP wins the next election, people will hold you accountable.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply


Krahnicle’s Cartoon: January 18, 2022




Continue Reading


KAY: Why is Prince Andrew the only one being held accountable?

“All I am saying is that the price he is paying — a royal castaway, shunned for the sake of The Firm’s continued good health, and relegated to a social Devil’s island — is very, very high, much higher than would have been the case for an ordinary man.”




It was with a pang that I was informed by People.com that “Queen Elizabeth strips Prince Andrew of [his eight] military titles and patronages amid sexual assault lawsuit,” as the headline read. A day after a judge rejected Prince Andrew’s attempt to have a civil lawsuit quashed, alleging sexual misconduct against him in 2001 by one of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, Virginia Giuffre, the axe fell.

Thursday, the royal palace announced, “With the Queen’s approval and agreement, The Duke of York’s military affiliations and royal patronages have been returned to the Queen.” Although still nominally a prince, Andrew will no longer have the right to be addressed as His Royal Highness (HRH). No more public duties for the dozens of charities for whom he has been a patron. “The Duke of York is defending this case,” the statement informed us, “as a private citizen.”

Why do I shudder slightly at those words, “private citizen,” and greet the news in general with a “pang,” though? Prince Andrew is nothing to me personally. He got himself into a very tawdry mess through his own appallingly bad judgment. The allegations surfaced in 2019, so this was no surprise. And it is not the first occasion in which bad judgment and a sense of entitlement has led “Randy Andy” into temptation of one kind or another, and thence onward to, at best, unethical behaviour, and at worst — oh dear, oh dear.

Let us not, though, count the ways that make this ultimate disgrace a deserved punishment for Andrew’s sins. Or rather, let other commentators — those who experience an uprush of joy or schadenfreude in their hearts when white males of extreme privilege are brought low, instead of a pang — do that.

When I unpack my pang a bit, what comes to mind is I know this had to be done; I know he deserved it; I know he is a wastrel. But oh, the mortification! And not for love, like Harry’s for Meghan or his great-uncle, Edward VIII’s for Wallis. At least they got to ride off to the colonies believing at the time they made the decision, anyway, their lives as royals were well lost for the glittering prize that had chosen them.

Even though he was of weak character — a suspected Nazi sympathizer, amongst other cases of bad judgment — Edward, Duke of Windsor was still a duke in exile. He was given royal sinecures to keep him busy. He was still a social asset outside Britain. Harry isn’t technically a Royal; he gave up his title voluntarily, but he’s good enough for Hollywood. So he has all the perks of royalty — money-making sinecures, constant attention, lots of social adulation — and none of the tedium. And when he comes home to visit, he still gets to mingle with the family. He has disappointed his family by quitting The Firm, and embarrassed them by foolishly airing private laundry, but he has not brought shame on the House of Windsor. He was not cast out. He left.

But for Andrew it’s the opposite. He cannot leave, but he has been “effectively banished.” There is no corner of the English-speaking world in which he can relax and just be himself. Himself? What would “himself” look like, stripped of what has defined him as a human being for all his 61 years? A turtle without a shell to retreat into. And no natural habitat. His gorgeous military uniforms will hang lifeless in his closets. Forever. I am trying to imagine what a future social life might look like. But I can’t.

Of course, there’s the saving grace of ex-wife Fergie to keep him company. Nobody is less likely to be judgmental, or more likely to empathize with the results of bad judgment in a buddy than Sarah Ferguson. I suspect she will eventually be remembered for her loyalty to Andrew in exile. He will have company watching Netflix. (Do you remember the scene in The Crown where the Duke — played by the wonderful actor Michael Kitchen — and Duchess of Windsor are watching Elizabeth’s televised coronation from their home in France? Oh, the suffering etched on Kitchen’s face.)

Andrew is often referred to as his mother’s favourite child, and that is how he was portrayed in The Crown as a boy on the cusp of manhood. He was buoyant, confident and ready for adventures of all kinds, military (at which he excelled) and prankish — even then, a bit of a wild card, but endearing to his mother on that account. In Philip’s general mold, but without Philip’s maturity, intellect and sense of duty.

But back to my pang. Consider: Stupid as he was, the woman accusing him of being party to her sex trafficking was 17 at the time of the alleged encounter. The age of consent in the U.K. as well as in 32 U.S. states is 16. A lot of other rich and famous men palled around with Epstein and made use of his private plane and visited his island home(s). How come their names didn’t come up in Maxwell’s trial? So maybe my pang has something to do with the murkiness surrounding the alleged encounter, and the fact that Andrew seems to have been cut from the herd to keep all eyes on him and all eyes off the American guys.

The only other man Giuffre publicly charged with sexual assault was celebrated lawyer Alan Dershowitz in 2019, who had defended Epstein in his 2005 sex-trafficking charges. Dershowitz immediately counter-attacked Giuffre in his typical take-no-prisoners style, and that turned into a nightmare of a legal circus that is apparently still unresolved. I imagine Giuffre took a lesson from her challenge to a lion. Next to Dershowitz, Andrew must look a lot like a sacrificial lamb.

Andrew is what he is, and I am not making the case he shouldn’t have paid an appropriate price for his bad behaviour — bad whether he slept with Giuffre or didn’t. All I am saying is that the price he is paying — a royal castaway, shunned for the sake of The Firm’s continued good health, and relegated to a social Devil’s island — is very, very high, much higher than would have been the case for an ordinary man. There is no court of appeal for this lifetime sentence.

Barbara Kay is a senior columnist for the Western Standard.
Twitter: @BarbaraRKay

Continue Reading


THOMAS: Gondek’s legacy could very well be an empty parking lot

“There can be no doubt that more than a few Calgarians, who are against using public money to help build the Event Centre, have benefited from the owners’ largess.”




Most of the people who have held the office of mayor of Calgary probably hoped to leave a legacy that people recognize as a positive contribution to the city.

Some did. Some didn’t. A couple of ‘dids’ come to mind. 

As mayor from 1980 to 1989, Ralph Klein’s legacy is as being part of the team that brought the 1988 Winter Olympics to Calgary, which resulted in the Saddledome being built, which brought the Calgary Flames to the city.

Dave Bronconnier, mayor from 2001 to 2010, also left a legacy near the Saddledome.

East Village: It’s the area directly east of city hall, stretching to Fort Calgary, with the Bow River on the north and 9 Ave. southeast on the south side.

When ‘Bronco’ took over the mayor’s chair, East Village was the most dangerous area of the city. Totally run down, it was a centre of illegal drug activity and the ‘office’ for sex workers. In earlier years, it served as the Calgary dump. It was not an area you wanted to be in, especially after dark.

Bronco, vowing to clean it up, approached the development community to gauge any interest in participating. 

There was no interest. Developers told him the cost to remediate the area was too high, but if the city undertook the task, there would be interest in building condo-apartment buildings. 

So, the mayor introduced the Tax Incremental Funding (TIF) program, with the blessing of the Alberta government. The way a TIF works is, an area for redevelopment is identified and for 20 years, all taxes collected in that area are used to pay infrastructure costs incurred by the city to get the job done. 

No tax money comes out of the city’s general revenues. Only money from taxes collected in the designated area. 

It obviously worked. The TIF helped pay for, among other things, the new central library, and East Village is now an urban oasis of apartments and retailers.

The TIF worked so well, city council decided to expand the area it financed, calling it the Rivers District, which runs from the banks of the Bow River south to 25 Ave. S.W., with Macleod Tr. as its western border. Eventually, the Bow Building was added to the Rivers District because of the high taxes it would pay, which would contribute greatly to the TIF, now renamed the Community Revitalization Levy (CRL).

Here, from the City’s website, its (abbreviated) definition of the CRL. 

“(The) Community Revitalization Levy substantially funds the delivery of the Rivers District Revitalization Plan. The levy provides a means to segregate increased property tax revenues in the Rivers District, which result from redevelopment into a fund that will be used to pay for the new infrastructure required. The end result is improvements in the Rivers District are self-funded without any additional tax burden on the balance of the city, and at the end of the CRL period, the amounts that were charged under the CRL would become general property tax revenues and flow into the general revenues of the city and the province.”

There’s a lot of work going on in the East Victoria Park area within the Rivers District, including the RoundUp Centre upgrade, the demolition of the Corral and a lot more to come. Plans include homes for 8,000 new residents in the community, with approximately four million square feet of absorbable mixed-use development, a Stampede Trail retail street and the LRT Green Line extension. All of this development might even give some justification to converting the empty downtown office buildings into residences. 

Up until about a month ago, the plans included a new Event Centre, to be built on a couple of mostly empty parking lots north of Stampede Park. The cost of the centre would have been shared by the Calgary Flames organization and the City of Calgary. 

That deal is dead.

How vital was/is the Event Centre to the success of the Rivers District? 

If the district was the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, the Event Centre would be Tom Brady.

The Event Centre would be home to more than the Calgary Flames. It would put Calgary in the big leagues in attracting major concerts and other events (hence the name). Under the dead deal with the Flames, the City of Calgary would have received a percentage of ticket sales to every event. There are other opportunities for revenue generation for the city that are now in jeopardy.

However, without the Flames as a partner in some fashion, there isn’t likely to be an event centre.

The Flames ownership group is first and foremost a collection of very successful and astute business people. They are not the billionaire robber barons some Calgarians claim them to be. 

Bringing NHL hockey to Calgary was a great contribution, but their greatest contribution is the millions and millions of dollars they have donated to charities, to build major medical facilities and more. There can be no doubt more than a few Calgarians who are against using public money to help build the Event Centre have benefited from the owners’ largess. 

Without a new, reasonable deal would the ownership group move the Flames out of the city? 

They absolutely would.

That would be Mayor Jyoti Gondek’s legacy.

Myke Thomas is a Western Standard contributor. He started in radio as a child voice actor, also working in television and as the real estate columnist, reporter and editor at the Calgary Sun for 22 years.

Continue Reading

Recent Posts

Recent Comments


Petition: No Media Bailouts

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

1,096 signatures

No Media Bailouts

The fourth estate is critical to a functioning democracy in holding the government to account. An objective media can't maintain editorial integrity when it accepts money from a government we expect it to be critical of.

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

**your signature**

The Western Standard will never accept government bailout money. By becoming a Western Standard member, you are supporting government bailout-free and proudly western media that is on your side. With your support, we can give Westerners a voice that doesn\'t need taxpayers money.

Share this with your friends:


Copyright © Western Standard New Media Corp.