fbpx
Connect with us

Energy

O’Reagan: ‘I don’t know if Canada needs more pipelines’

“I don’t know – I think the market will decide that and I think investors will decide that,” said O’Reagan.

mm

Published

on

The National Resources Minister and his civil servants don’t know if Canada needs more pipelines, but experts say the answer is obvious.

Reporters asked Seamus O’Reagan if Canada needed more pipelines during a stop in Alberta June 3 to announce hydrogen fueling stations for heavy trucks.

“I don’t know – I think the market will decide that and I think investors will decide that,” said O’Reagan.

It wasn’t the first time the question had been asked, according to documents the Canadian Press obtained by request.

After Keystone XL was cancelled in January, O’Reagan’s deputy minister held meetings with the Alberta government, Keystone XL owner TC energy, and other stakeholders.

A briefing note suggested the deputy minister ask: “Do you believe Canada still requires additional export capacity beyond [TransMountain] and Line 3? What do you see as the likely routes to putting it in place?”

Richard Masson, an executive fellow of the University of Calgary’s School of Public Policy, said the industry knows what the government might not.

“It’s better to have excess pipeline capacity so that if a refiner is trying to give you a lousy price, you’ve got an option to send it to a different refinery. And so that’s why producers are very keen to have more pipeline capacity than we have,” said Masson.

“A lot of folks who have never been in the oil business don’t understand that. So deputy ministers and ministers federally may never have had those kinds of experiences. But if you’re in the oil patch, you absolutely know you need options. You need spare capacity because that’s how you’re going to get the value for your resources,” he said in an interview.

Dan McTeague, president of Canadians For Affordable Energy, said the briefing memo shows a lack of esteem for the major economic contribution of pipelines and the energy sector.

“I don’t think the bureaucrat said this haphazardly or capriciously. I think unfortunately, it underscores substantial, significant and dangerous secrets by Canadians as to how important those pipelines are to the standard of living and the valued foundational benefits that we often take for granted,” McTeague said in an interview with the Western Standard.

“The deeper question is, if we’re going to allow to roll over and play dead every time a pipeline is destroyed, either by our government or by another government… then what is it that we want to do? Do we really want to end the oil and gas sector industry in Canada, representing directly 11% of the country’s GDP? If the question is, can we do without that industry? If we can do without pipelines, then how do you substitute an 11% drop in your economic activity? I don’t see it happening.”

Mike Simpson, Executive Director of Operations for the Canadian Energy Centre, agrees the case for more pipelines is strong.

“Canada does need additional pipelines. What the [Keystone XL] decision taught us is we shouldn’t have to rely on our ‘friends’ to grow our economy. While [TransMountain] and Line 3 are extremely important, those lines will provide egress of our current production, not necessarily allow for immediate growth of production. If Canada wants to see decades of economic strength and a strong and secure energy system we must build our own pipelines to our own coasts,” Simpson said in a written response to queries by the Western Standard.

“While there is the belief the market will decide if more pipelines are necessary, the market has been distorted by governments through over-regulation and interference – C-69 and [the] west coast tanker ban come to mind.

“In Alberta, there are many approved oil and gas projects ready to begin if there is an ability to move that product out. Those projects would bring great economic fortune to Canada. However, until we have our own secure pipeline network to our own coasts, we will be missing out on a tremendous opportunity.”

Harding is a Western Standard corresponded based in Saskatchewan

Lee Harding is the Saskatchewan Political Columnist for the Western Standard. He is also a Research Fellow at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy and is the former Saskatchewan Director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.

Continue Reading
3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Steven

    June 28, 2021 at 9:51 am

    Minister O’Reagan forgets there are no Canadian oil pipelines from Western Canada to Ontario or Quebec. Line 5 runs down in to the USA then back into Ontario.

    I’d say to Albertans, why are we supporting Central Canada when they don’t like us, don’t want us as part of the country anyways? Let the oil/gas industry in Alberta know that Eastern Canada can go it alone on energy. Albertans will keep selling to the USA & shipping West. Oil/Gas to Eastern Canada suspended until the Liberal Idiots come to their senses; if ever ??

  2. Linda McAuley

    June 16, 2021 at 5:50 pm

    I guess I would say as long as we have Saudi oil coming to Canada, we don’t need to use our own product. / sarc

  3. Left Coast

    June 16, 2021 at 9:30 am

    Scamus O’Reagan doesn’t Know . . . just like the rest of Justin’s merry band of Diversity & Gender morons.

    Windmills & Solar Panels will not be a substitute for Oil, Gas & Coal EVER !

    There is nothing today that can replace so-called fossil fuels . . . period !

    Meanwhile . . . long Trains of Oil Tank Cars are coming down the Fraser Canyon every day . . . only a matter of time till we find a few in the Fraser River. When that happens it will be entirely on the Federal Govt, BC & the Enviro-fascists.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Energy

Deal sees Alberta becoming half owner of the Sturgeon Refinery

North West Refining will be paid $425 million to forego future tolling revenue and for its 50% equity stake. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., which owns the other 50% of the refinery, will also be paid $400 million.

mm

Published

on

The Alberta government now owns 50% of the troubled Sturgeon Refinery.

Energy Minister Sonya Savage said yesterday the move should free up $2 billion for provincial coffers.

“We are taking action to get a better deal for taxpayers and reducing long-term costs. This agreement provides more economic certainty which will benefit Albertans today and into the future. We look forward to our renewed arrangement with the refinery’s operator, the North West Redwater Partnership, in the years to come,” Savage said in a release.

Under the deal, the government is transferred a 50% ownership interest in the refinery previously held by North West Refining.

The government made the switch after reviewing contracts the Sturgeon Refinery signed with former premier Ed Stelmach’s government in 2011.

The Alberta director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, Kevin Lacey, wasn’t happy with the deal.

“The government is just trying to dig themselves out of bad contracts they signed in the past. We expect our government to run schools, hospitals and keep our taxes low, they should not be involved in the energy business,” Lacey told the Western Standard.

“Alberta needs our government to support our energy sector, yes, but it should not be directly involved in the industry. Let the politicians run the government and business people run businesses.”

With the deal, North West Refining will be paid $425 million to forego future tolling revenue and for its 50% equity stake. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., which owns the other 50% of the refinery, will also be paid $400 million.

“This process will not cost taxpayers any additional funds than the government would otherwise be obligated to pay as a toll payer,” said a government release.

“Through the agreement, the government is able to capture the value of processing bitumen as both a toll payer and facility owner.

“This plan improves the government’s net present value for the refinery by approximately $2 billion over the life of the project. Net present value is the difference between the present value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows over a period of time.”

The government said the agreement also frees up $1 billion in cash flow over the next five years because additional cash flow is a result of the restructuring.

The agreement includes a 10-year extension of the processing agreement to 2058.

“With this optimization, the government has an equal vote in the control of the refinery to which it is the majority toll payer. Canadian Natural will provide operational leadership to North West Redwater Partnership,” said the government.

The Sturgeon Refinery is designed to process approximately 79,000 barrels per day of diluted bitumen from Alberta’s oil sands into higher-value products like low-carbon, low-sulphur diesel, vacuum gas oil, diluent and natural gas liquids.

It was set to originally cost $5.4 billion but was completed last year at a cost of close to $11 billion.

Dave Naylor is the News Editor of the Western Standard
dnaylor@westernstandardonline.com
Twitter.com/nobby7694

Continue Reading

Energy

WAGNER: The partnership rooted in faith that built the oil sands

“Ernest Manning’s enthusiasm for the development of the oil sands helped to attract Pew’s investment, and their shared Christian commitment cemented a partnership that proved beneficial for the entire province.”

mm

Published

on

The two men most responsible for the commercial development of Alberta’s oil sands were Ernest Manning and J. Howard Pew. Ernest Manning, of course, was Alberta’s premier for 25 years, and Pew was a long-time president of Sun Oil (later known as Sunoco), a company co-founded by his father Joseph Newton Pew in 1886. These two men had a common spiritual bond that contributed to their successful relationship, facilitating their cooperation on the development of the oil sands.

The opening of Alberta’s oil sands is one of the events covered in Darren Dochuk’s 2019 book, Anointed with Oil: How Christianity and Crude Made Modern America. Dochuk is a history professor at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana, but he was born and raised in Edmonton. He is no stranger to Alberta and its history.

Beginning in the 1920s, attempts were made to commercially extract usable products from the oil sands, but they were mostly unsuccessful. Nevertheless, Manning saw the potential they held and continued to search for an investor. Pew was interested and saw the oil sands as a resource that could help provide North American energy security. Sun Oil Vice-President Clarence Thayer shared Pew’s perspective.

As Dochuk writes, “Impelled by Thayer and his own obsession with the oil sands, in 1962 Pew committed a quarter of a billion dollars to the creation of Great Canadian Oil Sands.” 

Dochuk adds, “Pew and Manning would manage this investment together over the coming years, as business partners and fellow believers.”

That “fellow believers” bit is important. Manning was known across much of Canada as the radio evangelist for Back to the Bible Hour, and he was also recognized in American evangelical circles. For instance, Manning spoke on behalf of evangelist Billy Graham and wrote for Graham’s periodical. Pew was also heavily involved in conservative evangelical causes, and was even known for a time as “God’s bankroller” due to his financial support of those causes. Pew was as conservative in politics as he was in religion, and prominently supported Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater’s 1964 presidential campaign, which was a watershed moment for the conservative movement to take decisive control over the Republican Party. 

Construction of the Great Canadian Oil Sands (GCOS) processing plant began in 1964. A ceremony was held on July 2 of that year to inaugurate the construction. At the climax of this event, Dochuk writes, Ernest Manning “praised the project as the finest example of free enterprise from which Alberta and the entire Dominion would profit.”

Even as construction got underway, negotiations over the project continued between the Alberta government and Sun Oil. They didn’t always see eye-to-eye. Manning, of course, wanted to ensure Albertans would receive maximum benefit for the development of their resources. Pew, on the other hand, wanted to maximize the profitability for Sun Oil.

Dochuk writes, “While Manning and Pew had become good friends by this point, conflicting interests still required ironing out. Enter Billy Graham. With their mutual ally serving as mediator, Pew and Manning began exchanging letters at a fairer clip. Soon the correspondence assumed a comity strengthened by talk about the Bible.”

Manning and Pew’s relationship deepened further, and their wives became good friends as well. The GCOS plant officially opened in 1967, with both Manning and Pew presiding over the ceremony.

The following year Manning retired as premier and was replaced by Harry Strom, a devoted evangelical just like his two Social Credit predecessors. As Dochuk notes, “One of Strom’s first trips after becoming premier was to Washington, DC, to hear Manning keynote Richard Nixon’s Presidential Prayer Breakfast, an event assisted by Billy Graham and J. Howard Pew.”

Since the discovery of oil at Leduc in 1947, Americans have played a key role in in the development of Alberta’s oil resources. It was J. Howard Pew – and not a Canadian investor – who decided to risk millions on opening up the oil sands. All Albertans have benefited from his risky venture through the economic prosperity that resulted, as well as the royalties paid to the provincial government. Those royalties pay for health care, education and other services. 

Ernest Manning’s enthusiasm for the development of the oil sands helped to attract Pew’s investment, and their shared Christian commitment cemented a partnership that proved beneficial for the entire province.

Michael Wagner is a Senior Columnist for the Western Standard

Continue Reading

Energy

WITTEVRONGEL: Changes to royalties could super-charge upgrading in Alberta

“Updating the royalty system to one based on market pricing for bitumen also invites capital investment and the accompanying development of other oil sands products such as carbon fibre.”

mm

Published

on

With news of the official termination of the Keystone XL project, the Alberta government is out approximately $1.3 billion. What’s more, the province is left with unrefined bitumen that it doesn’t have the capacity to upgrade to higher-value products like gasoline and diesel. Why, then, does the province not look to develop its own capacity to refine bitumen and upgrade its oil sands resources internally?

While the answer is complex, one factor is the government’s royalty system, which disincentivizes processing bitumen into higher-value products. Due to the Bitumen Valuation Methodology (BVM), the government collects higher royalties per barrel for oil sands producers that upgrade bitumen compared with those selling raw bitumen directly to refineries. Charging a much lower royalty payment per barrel encourages the sale of raw bitumen out of province. 

Currently about 35% of the bitumen produced in Alberta is upgraded in the province, with the remaining 65% sold directly to out-of-province refineries. Prior to the implementation of the BVM in 2009, roughly 60% was upgraded in Alberta. In addition to the more than $18 billion that oil sands investors have spent on American refineries and upgraders since the BVM was instituted, many jobs that could have gone to Albertans have also been created and maintained in the United States. 

It just makes sense. Why would a producer pay more to upgrade bitumen in the province when it costs considerably less to have an out-of-province refinery do it?

In 2019, oil sands extraction and refineries alone contributed over $68 billion to the Alberta economy and sustained more than 131,000 jobs. This translates to over 18% of provincial GDP and more than 5% of the province’s workforce. It is estimated aligning the BVM with market prices would allow the volume of bitumen upgraded in the province to increase to 50% over the next 12 years. This would result in the creation of over 41,000 jobs in the province and generate an average of more than $700 million in annual revenue, despite a short-term reduction in revenues. 

Updating the royalty system to one based on market pricing for bitumen also invites capital investment and the accompanying development of other oil sands products, such as carbon fibre. Alberta Innovates, a Crown corporation mandated to promote innovation, sees significant potential in carbon fibre, which could represent a multibillion-dollar opportunity. Replacing steel with carbon fibre can reduce the weight of a typical vehicle by two-thirds, and a lighter vehicle reduces fuel consumption.

The government of Alberta’s 2020 Recovery Plan pledges to create tens of thousands of jobs, make Alberta more competitive, and ensure a strong future for the province’s innovative energy industry. Given these commitments, fixing the BVM seems like low-hanging fruit. 

By Krystle Wittevrongel, Public Policy Analyst at the Montreal Economic Institute

Continue Reading

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Share

Petition: No Media Bailouts

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

163 signatures

No Media Bailouts

The fourth estate is critical to a functioning democracy in holding the government to account. An objective media can't maintain editorial integrity when it accepts money from a government we expect it to be critical of.

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

**your signature**



The Western Standard will never accept government bailout money. By becoming a Western Standard member, you are supporting government bailout-free and proudly western media that is on your side. With your support, we can give Westerners a voice that doesn\'t need taxpayers money.

Share this with your friends:

Trending

Copyright © Western Standard New Media Corp.