fbpx
Connect with us

News

Kielburger Brothers admit they were in touch with PMO

mm

Published

on

The Kielburger brothers admitted Monday they were in touch with an aide from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s office over a $43.5 million grant to their WE charity.

Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre brought up a friendly June 27, 2020 exchange between the Kielburgers and Ben Chin, then a senior advisor to the Prime Minister.

“Your smirking and your evading might be fun now,” said Poilievre. 

“It’s not going to be fun when we’re investigating you for contempt of Parliament.”

Chin, a former CBC-TV announcer, in 2019 was appointed an advisor to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. He has never testified at any parliamentary hearings.

Last May 22, the Liberals voted to award We Charity millions in funding to manage a pandemic relief program for students. 

The funding was subsequently revoked July 3 on disclosures We Charity gave the Prime Minister’s family $481,751 in gifts, fees and expense-paid trips to London and New York, hired then-Finance Minister Bill Morneau’s daughter out of college, and covered Morneau’s $41,366 in expenses at resorts in Kenya and Ecuador.

Morneau abruptly resigned last August 21.

Trudeau has maintained he knew nothing of the We Charity grant until days before he voted for it, and that his office played no role in negotiating the benefit. 

“We Charity received no preferential treatment, not from me, not from anyone else,” Trudeau testified last July 30 at the Commons finance committee.

But the Kielburgers on Monday admitted contacting Chin to thank him for help with the program. The disclosure came under rapid-fire questioning by Poilievre.

Poilievre: “What was the role exactly of Mr. Chin, senior advisor to the Prime Minister, in setting up this program?”

Craig Kielburger: “I don’t think he had any role in it.”

Poilievre: “Is that the answer from both of you?”

Marc Kielburger: “Who are you referring to, sir? Can you repeat it please?”

Poilievre: “Ben Chin.”

Marc Kielburger: “There was no role.”

Poilievre: “Craig, no role?”

Craig Kielburger: “Not that I’m aware of.”

Poilievre: “Then why did you send him a message on LinkedIn on June 27 saying, ‘Hello, Ben. Thank you for your kindness in helping shape our latest program with the government. Warmly, Craig.’”

Craig Kielburger: “Sure. I sent a hundred messages because I only had seven people, eight people on LinkedIn before that. That day a hundred messages went out. My executive assistant sent them to people to join on LinkedIn, and he was one of them.”

Poilievre: “Sorry, Craig, this is your message. It’s signed by you. And if I could be clear, it doesn’t just say ‘wish you well.’ It says, ‘Ben, thank you for your kindness in helping shape our latest program with the government. Warmly, Craig.’ You sent that, did you not?”

Craig Kielburger: “I don’t dispute that was sent but – ”

Poilievre: Sorry, you got yourself in a lot of trouble here. You just said a moment ago you thought the Prime Minister’s senior advisor Mr. Chin had no role in the establishment of the program, but I have correspondence where you thanked him for ‘helping shape’ that very program. Why did you thank him for shaping the program when now you claim you didn’t know he played any role in the program?”

Craig Kielburger: “My executive assistant wanted to personalize very kindly. She’s a great EA, wrote a few lines to a hundred different LinkedIn requests that went that same day to different people to join my LinkedIn page.”

Poilievre: “Excuse me, Craig You’re in a lot of trouble here, my friend. You’re under oath. Perjury is a crime.”

“This is important because you have until now claimed the Prime Minister’s Office was not involved in shaping the program, it was just a bureaucrat in the Department of Employment,” said Poilievre. “You’ve tried to distance the Prime Minister who your organization has paid off.”

“Mr. Chin actually responded to your message,” said Poilievre. “He said, ‘Great to hear from you, Craig. Let’s get our young working,’ obviously in direct reference to the program”:

Poilievre: “What was the name of the assistant that you claim wrote your email through LinkedIn to Mr. Ben Chin?”

Craig Kielburger: “Mr. Poilievre, I’ve gotten death threats. Our staff have gotten death threats…I am not naming another employee, especially a former executive assistant, to you, sir.”

Poilievre: “We will be asking for it to be handed over to the committee. We can keep that information from the public, but I want to find out if this person actually exists. Do you commit to giving that person’s name to the committee?”

Craig Kielburger: “With the permission of that person and the conversations that unfolded, we’ll get back to you on that point. That’s a private matter.”

Poilievre: “No, it’s not a private matter actually. This is someone you claim was writing correspondence to the Prime Minister’s Office on your behalf. We want to confirm this person actually exists, because the correspondence that has your name on it contradicts the testimony you’ve given directly, and you will need to provide it to prove you in fact are telling the truth here, because it’s very hard to believe…”

Marc Kielburger: “Mr. Poilievre, does anybody in your office write your correspondence?”

Craig Kielburger: “Do you write all your correspondence, sir? You don’t have an assistant who helps you with any of it?”

Poilievre: “I can tell you I didn’t send Ben Chin an email thanking him for a program that I didn’t think he set up, so back to you.”

“I appreciate your lawyer is trying to help you out here,” Poilievre told the Kielburgers. 

“He looks extremely uncomfortable, and I don’t blame him. I hope he’s being paid well for this, and I think he will be in your employ for a very long time because lying to a parliamentary committee is in fact an offence.”

Dave Naylor is the News Editor of the Western Standard
dnaylor@westernstandardonline.com
Twitter.com/nobby7694

Dave Naylor is the News Editor of the Western Standard and the Vice-President: News Division of Western Standard New Media Corp. He has served as the City Editor of the Calgary Sun and has covered Alberta news for nearly 40 years. dnaylor@westernstandardonline.com

News

Loophole benching minor hockey in Cochrane

Within hours of sending out the e-mail, Oaten confirmed between 30 and 40 kids had withdrawn from the program.

mm

Published

on

Although new restrictions announced this week allow for recreational sports to continue for youth under 18 without proof of vaccination, one minor detail is benching minor hockey players in Cochrane.

Thursday morning, Cochrane Minor Hockey Association (CMHA) President Cory Oaten, was sent an e-mail from Hockey Alberta stating: “…based on Hockey Alberta’s interpretation of current information, minor hockey games and practices can continue, subject to the updated temporary measures that came into effect at 12:01 am this morning.”

However, Friday morning, Oaten was notified by his local facility, Spray Lake Sawmills Family Sports Centre, it would be requiring proof of vaccination for those 12 and older entering the building.

That morning Oaten notified families registered with CMHA of the new requirement and included a provided statement from the facility and assured families the decision was not that of Hockey Alberta or CMHA.

“… all persons entering the Cochrane Arena or SLSFSC (ages 12+) must show proof of full vaccination, proof of a single dose as long as the dose was given more than two weeks ago, a negative test result or a medical doctor approved medical exemption.”

“Tonnes of kids are withdrawing,” Oaten said.

Within hours of sending out the e-mail, Oaten confirmed between 30 and 40 kids had withdrawn from the program.

“I’m not against the vaccines, but I’m pro-choice,” Oaten said.

The Western Standard spoke with one father who pulled his CMHA player as a result of the facility mandates. He requested to remain anonymous.

“Obviously the government is just passing the buck on this and it’s the businesses that are going to take the brunt,” he said.

A father of four children under the age of 12, he was also in line to coach his son’s team, but will not be permitted inside as he is not vaccinated.  

“We’re not the type of parents that are just going to drop our kids off at a facility and leave them unsupervised,” he said, adding those decisions effectively ended his kids’ participation in CMHA’s sports programs.

He said he also has concerns for the liability involved with those businesses being ill-equipped to manage peoples’ sensitive health records.

“Forget the legality of all this. Morally, we just can’t support businesses that take this approach.”

Alberta Country Singer and former health care worker at the Alberta Children’s Hospital, Paul Brandt, took to Facebook on Friday to express his thoughts on the vaccine passport issue.  

Facebook post

“I want to be clear, I am not against vaccines,” his post confirms. “What is troubling to me is this: Why aren’t people who have had COVID and recovered being included in the conversation?”

Brandt’s son is a CMHA player. Both have recovered from COVID-19.

“Why are we not being recognized as people who have adequate immunity?

As of today, my son has also been told by the arena that hosts his hockey association he will not be allowed to participate in sports unless he is vaccinated—even though he has immunity to COVID-19, and is of no greater risk to his peers than anyone else.”

Oaten pointed out that players who have yet to be vaccinated will be eliminated from the important tryouts happening now and, because of wait times between doses and the 14-day waiting period to be considered fully vaccinated, many will miss a chunk of the season.

“It’s about the kids,” said an emotional Oaten.

“What makes me upset is kids are going to have to quit hockey because they don’t want to have to choose a medical procedure in order to play.”

Risdon is a reporter for the Western Standard
mrisdon@westernstandardonline.com

Continue Reading

News

WS EXCLUSIVE: UCP vice-president calls for emergency meeting to initiate leadership review

“I think we need to carefully consider the option of initiating a leadership review. I believe the future of our party may be at stake.”

mm

Published

on

The Western Standard has obtained an email from the vice-president (policy) of Alberta’s United Conservative Party (UCP) calling for an emergency meeting of the province-wide board of directors to discuss a leadership review of Alberta Premier Jason Kenney.

Joel Mullan e-mailed the party’s board of directors at 8:33 pm MST September 17, under the subject line “Leadership review—request for meeting.”

“In light of events this past week, I believe we should meet and therefore request a meeting,” wrote Mullan.

“Specifically, I think we need to carefully consider the option of initiating a leadership review. I believe the future of our party may be at stake.”

The Western Standard spoke to a member of the party’s board of directors who received the e-mail who said—on condition of anonymity—a timely review of Kenney’s leadership has “become inevitable.”

As of publishing it’s not known if the request for an emergency meeting has been accepted by party president Ryan Becker or the board at large.

One day before, the Western Standard reported the UCP constituency association (CA) in Olds-Didsbury-Three Hills voted almost unanimously to trigger a prompt leadership review of Kenney.

The party currently has a review scheduled for late 2022, but that could be within six months of the next election, and for local CA president Robert Smith, that’s not good enough.

By a vote of 27-1, the CA’s board voted to send a letter to the party demanding a review before that as soon as possible, but before next March, said Smith.

“We would love for it to happen tomorrow,” Smith told the Western Standard.

“In talking to people, mainly rural people, it’s fair to say we have no confidence in the premier.”

While the letter was sent on the heels of controversial new COVID-19 lockdown restrictions introduced by Kenney—including the imposition of a vaccine passport—Smith stressed the letter wasn’t as a result of that, but had been brewing for months.

But he said those restrictions could help the momentum to reach the mark of 22 ridings needed to spark a leadership review.

Smith said he gets a sense in talking to other constituency association leaders “critical mass of 22 ridings could have been reached now.

“I feel confident in saying that target can now be met. I’m surprised it hasn’t been met before,” he said.

Clockwise, Jason Nixon, Tyler Shandro, Jason Kenney, Travis Toews, and an unidentified guest on the rooftop patio of the “Sky Palace”

One of the biggest concerns for the board was when the now infamous pictures f Kenney holding an outdoor dinner on the balcony of the “Sky Palace”—in contravention of the government’s of laws, regulations, and guidelines—were published.

“The entitlement and the double standard incensed the board,” said Smith.

In April, a UCP MLA told the Western Standard they are “100% certain” Kenney will be the subject of an early party leadership review.

“Caucus is in total chaos,” said the MLA, who spoke with the Western Standard on the condition of anonymity.

The Western Standard reported earlier there are at least eight ridings now on board for a review.

Even earlier this week there were signs of dissension with the UCP Caucus.

During a tense meeting of caucus Tuesday, three MLAs told Kenney they had “no confidence” in his continued premiership of the province and leadership of the party, multiple sources told the Western Standard.

Sources inside of the caucus told the Western Standard the emergency meeting saw sharp polarization around the issues of putting the province under another lockdown, a potential mandatory vaccine passport, and firing healthcare workers who did not agree to be vaccinated.

According to the MLAs who attended the caucus meeting, three MLAs openly told Kenney they had “no confidence” in him, and several others implied as much using softer language.

The sources all gave the same three names, but none of the three MLAs responded to request for comment or confirmation from the Western Standard.

Continue Reading

News

THOMSON: An Alberta solution to the drug poisoning crisis

A regulated drug supply is the best deal on offer to shrink public health costs and enforcement budgets and repossess the drug market from organized crime syndicates, while creating good jobs and preserving the lives of thousands of working-age Albertans.

mm

Published

on

Dr. Euan Thomson is an entrepreneur, scientist and director of EACH+EVERY, a coalition of over 100 Alberta businesses calling for policy action to end the overdose crisis.

Drug poisoning is the leading cause of death among working-age Albertans, claiming more than 1,800 Albertan lives since the beginning of 2020. Almost all of these people were between the ages of 15 and 60, and people in the trades are vastly overrepresented.

These tragedies are more accurately called poisonings because people typically cannot be certain what they’re taking when they consume illegal drugs. Surviving through an unregulated drug supply is its own small miracle, particularly as elephant-strength synthetic opioids like carfentanil now slip through our sieve-like borders.

Let’s face it: synthetic opioids have extinguished any hope of “winning” the war on drugs, given the entire 2016 American fentanyl supply could fit into a dozen oil drums.

Albertans are free thinkers, and this crisis calls for a made-in-Alberta solution that centres personal autonomy, free enterprise, fiscal responsibility, and a healthy irreverence toward federal power. A century into drug prohibition with nothing to show but accelerating body counts, it is time to regain control through a regulated market.

The idea that in a regulated market, we would walk into corner stores and find crystal meth between the Mentos and Tic Tacs would be laughable if it wasn’t so widely cited. For experimenting adolescents, alcohol is at least as hard to obtain as illegal drugs precisely because its access is controlled—a distinction that also encourages open conversations and harm reduction measures. We can implement regulatory barriers as needed to keep kids safe, but only once we control the supply. For adults, the question is much simpler: shouldn’t we be allowed to put what we want in our bodies?

Decriminalization is the first step toward a legal market. Since decriminalizing drugs 20 years ago, Portugal has among the lowest youth drug use rates in Europe and effectively left its drug poisoning crisis behind. Our federal parties are short on details around their vision for ending Canada’s crisis, but the Western Standard Editorial Board recently gave the federal NDP’s platform section on drug policy the only A-grade for endorsing decriminalization and other measures emphasizing personal autonomy and freedom from harassment by authorities. (For the record, it was one of the only high-scoring parts of the NDP platform from the Western Standard.)

It turns out, people across the political spectrum agree after a hundred years, criminalization has failed to even slow down drug use, let alone end it.

While personal autonomy and market philosophy are intuitive drug policy cornerstones, the fiscal argument is at least as compelling. The Cato Institute reports ending the War on Drugs would eliminate $27 billion USD a year from American enforcement budgets and siphon $40 billion a year from organized crime. For Canada, this translates to billions cut from our enforcement, judicial and incarceration balance sheet and billions added to taxable sales. Meanwhile, reducing hospital visits due to drug poisonings could single-handedly solve the chronic ambulance shortages squeezing our emergency response capacity.

A regulated drug supply is the best deal on offer to shrink public health costs and enforcement budgets and repossess the drug market from organized crime syndicates, while creating good jobs and preserving the lives of thousands of working-age Albertans.

How can we propel this plan against the drag of federal inaction?

First, set up a province-wide exemption from Section 56 of the federal Controlled Drugs and Substances Act to abolish police enforcement of drug possession laws.

Next, support Albertan pilot projects to prescribe safe supply options to encourage more widespread access and choke off the demand for a street supply. Non-profit compassion clubs would cover those who cannot afford their prescriptions, as we saw during cannabis prohibition.

Finally, establish the first provincial Section 55 exemption to allow for drug manufacturing and distribution here at home, a move that would instantly benefit a Lethbridge-based operation and their partners in the nearby Blood Tribe. Alberta Gaming, Liquor & Cannabis already looks after compliance for legal drugs; we can apply similar stringency around labelling on the new products so people know what they’re taking.

Then watch as other provinces struggling with the same crisis adopt this updated, evidence-based Alberta Model; one that aligns compassion for people who use drugs with core values shared by so many in this province: personal autonomy, free enterprise, and fiscal responsibility.

While we’re at it, we can thumb our collective nose at a century of bad federal policy—all together, on brand for Alberta.

Tell your local federal and municipal candidates, as well as your provincial MLA, you want to see your values reflected in our drug policies.

Dr. Euan Thomson is an entrepreneur, scientist and director of EACH+EVERY, a coalition of over 100 Alberta businesses calling for policy action to end the overdose crisis.


Continue Reading

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Share

Petition: No Media Bailouts

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

343 signatures

No Media Bailouts

The fourth estate is critical to a functioning democracy in holding the government to account. An objective media can't maintain editorial integrity when it accepts money from a government we expect it to be critical of.

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

**your signature**



The Western Standard will never accept government bailout money. By becoming a Western Standard member, you are supporting government bailout-free and proudly western media that is on your side. With your support, we can give Westerners a voice that doesn\'t need taxpayers money.

Share this with your friends:

Trending

Copyright © Western Standard New Media Corp.