There is wisdom in the long-standing advice about offering unsolicited advice, which is independent of whether the advice given is good, bad or petty. This is because it’s difficult to offer unsolicited advice without actively joining, or appearing to join, a busybody club. Publicly given “advice” always begs the question of intentions, agendas and ambitions. Brian Jean likely knew this when he addressed his recent public advice to Jason Kenney, the Alberta premier.
The mention of how the premier ought to eat and sleep seems unfortunate. It falls into the busybody column, risking the valuable part of Jean’s critique to be dismissed. Governments listen to advice arising from a field of competency and expertise, not from gossip.
However, the suggestion that Alberta ministers should surround themselves with the mature counsel of people who understand their constituents is exceptionally good advice. Alas, the implications and underlying assumptions in Jean’s argument are terrible. They seem to reinforce the Laurentian xenophobic stereotype about the agrarian prairies, even while Jean accuses outsiders of seeing Albertans through stereotypes.
In Jean’s opinion, there need to be fewer people working for Alberta ministers who recently “moved to Alberta for the first time.” Jean went on to say that “Albertans would be surprised by how many of this government’s top staff and bureaucrats aren’t from Alberta.”
Are Albertans scandalised by these things? Most Albertans typically do not care where people are from, what religion they embrace, what sexual orientation or skin colour. They care about whether someone can do the job they get paid to do. It’s performance that counts. Albertans care about results.
According to Jean, people who recently come from away don’t understand Alberta or Albertans. Is Jean presupposing that only Albertans or the people whom he calls “real Albertans” can understand us? The outsiders “…think they get us. But they don’t,” he wrote. Albertans are not insularly suspicious of outsiders, even those recently arrived; that is not the face of contemporary Alberta. Jean knows as well as anyone from Fort MacMurray knows that Albertans welcome those who arrive from elsewhere to work in Alberta, whether inside of Canada or from abroad.
There is something partially true, and something stereotypically fallacious, about Jean’s argument. It is likely true that someone who just arrived in Alberta may not understand Alberta. But it is also true that many born in Alberta do not have the instincts to understand Albertans. It is also true that there are many Albertans “who are not from here” but understand Albertans well and love Alberta as much as one born here. That love is their “skin in the game.”
Being born in Alberta or living there for long do not immediately guarantee that one can do any job well or even better than someone from elsewhere. The excellence of individual Albertans is not determined by birthplace but by an approach to success, by an ethic of hard work, personal autonomy, individual enterprise and problem-solving. People from elsewhere who exhibit some of these qualities are most likely to plug into Alberta culture very well (The premier himself was not born in Alberta). Albertans welcome and encourage such people to be among us.
Similarly, any clever observer of human nature and political culture freshly arriving somewhere is often able to make meaningful observations and detect nuance, difference and similarity, foundational beliefs and cultural premises more pointedly and accurately than someone who does not have the comparative experience of being from elsewhere. People with cultural sensitivity who have travelled or studied abroad have a strong sense of this experience. The question is skill, not origin. Jean went to university in Australia. He also knows this.
Whether one is from Alberta or “from away” must never be the focus. Albertans are genuinely welcoming. There is no need to perpetuate Laurentian xenophobic stereotypes about Albertans.
The crux of the issue is whether the people who surround the premier and his ministers can do the job well, and it is fair to say looking at the polls that Alberta voters find them wanting. As Jean rightly points out, voters find the Kenney government falling short on energy policy, interprovincial affairs, and the policy-induced COVID crisis, among other things. Surely, some of that needs correcting. The wisdom of unsolicited advice aside, casting oblique dispersions on people’s abilities (or lack thereof) because they are not from Alberta will always be a bad idea.
Marco Navarro-Génie is a columnist for the Western Standard. He is also a senior fellow at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy and president of the Haultain Research Institute. He is co-author, with Barry Cooper, of COVID-19: The Politics of a Pandemic Moral Panic (2020).
SLOBODIAN: Manitoba response to Freedom Convoy has politicians cowering
“Truckers rolling down the highways — determined heroes in thousands of rigs, trucks, and cars — have unleashed a righteous beast in Canadians fed up with bullies messing with their freedoms and livelihoods and treating the unvaccinated as second-class lepers.”
Federal politicians and bureaucrats will probably be hiding in their closets or under their desks, frozen in fear, when the massive Freedom Convoy arrives in Ottawa.
And they should hide in shame until they get it straight — that they were elected to carry out the will of the people; that it’s long past time to start listening.
Maybe a crescendo of blaring horns in the capital will improve their hearing.
They’ve created a big COVID-19 mess, underestimated the Canadians they’ve tormented and tried to crush, pulled cheap stunts, and delivered fancy, empty condescending lectures.
Few are listening to them anymore. Truckers have taken the wheel and won the trust and respect and hearts and minds of countless Canadians who oppose vaccine mandates and freedom of speech being trampled on.
Elected pooh-bahs who’ve lost any esteem they may have had just don’t know what to do about that.
Truckers rolling down the highways — determined heroes in thousands of rigs, trucks, and cars — have unleashed a righteous beast in Canadians fed up with bullies messing with their freedoms and livelihoods and treating the unvaccinated as second-class lepers.
That’s why hundreds of freezing supporters braved -30C temperatures to greet the convoy when it blared into Brandon, Man., population 60,000, around noon Tuesday.
A driver going the other way told the Western Standard the convoy was 100 km long.
It was a magnificent, electric scene that has, and will continue to repeat itself along highways, roads and overpasses in towns and cities across Canada until convoys coming from several directions converge on the capital January 29.
The cheering Brandon supporters didn’t come empty-handed. They brought more than 1,000 bagged lunches — sandwiches, homemade cookies, muffins, puffed wheat cakes — prepared in kitchens throughout the province.
Someone even very thoughtfully hauled in porta-potties.
These regular Canadians don’t have much use for most politicians (Of course, Carlton MP Pierre Poilievre is an exception).
But Canadians love, love, love the truckers!
“People have been dropping food and drinks off all morning,” said Virden’s Ingrid Wilkinson, who organized the bagged lunches served at several stations.
“I’m doing it for all the harm that’s been caused. I personally know many people who have been greatly harmed. I’m doing this for our parents who had to live through Nazi occupation. Thankfully, they’re not in this world now. I do it for the kids, their future,” said Wilkinson.
“This is not sustainable. It’s a big lie.”
The Virden group had $825 left over from money raised to buy food to donate it to the trucker’s GoFundMe which stands at $4.6 million and counting. This amazing feat was accomplished in just 10 days.
About 193 km away in Headingley, more food and support awaited the convoy where Hutterite communities prepared for the arrival of the “dear” truckers.
“We are setting up kitchens n gonna feed you all. We are with you, and we fully support this massive convoy for freedom,” tweeted Paul Kleinsasser. “May God protect you on your journey, keep on going, we are praying for you. God bless.”
The convoy was expected to arrive in Winnipeg a few hours later.
The truckers oppose the cross-border vaccine mandates that severely impact their livelihoods.
The truckers also oppose vaccine mandates inflicted on everyone else — nurses, police, military, worshipers, children, students — everyone.
Canadians embrace and are emboldened by their courage and stamina.
So yes, they are well fed, dearly loved, and, it appears, to be shunned by most politicians.
However, Conservative MPs Andrew Scheer and Warrant Steinley did show up to greet the convoy in Regina Monday night.
Conservative Deputy Leader Candice Bergen blasted the Liberal government and threw her support behind truckers.
“I support peaceful demonstrations against these mandates, and our truckers from Portage-Lisgar and from across Canada,” the Portage-Lisgar MP tweeted Tuesday.
Bergen said Trudeau “dealt our crumbling supply chain another blow” when he implemented mandates making 26,000 truckers unable to transport of goods across the Canada-U.S. border “which will only drive inflation higher than it’s been in over 30 years.
“Conservatives have been opposed to federal mandated vaccines since Trudeau introduced them: and we oppose the mandatory vaccine on Canadian truckers.”
Bergen noted that truckers bring much-needed supplies to Canada and “worked tirelessly over the pandemic” to keep supplies moving.
“Hamstringing this essential industry is nothing more than a political move to further divide Canadians.”
As for the main event in Ottawa, count on People’s Party of Canada Leader Maxime Bernier to be there.
But hell will freeze over before Prime Minister Justin Trudeau finds the courage or respect to greet the convoy that speaks for a huge segment of the country.
Opposition Leader Erin O’Toole repeatedly dodged questions Monday about whether he supports the truckers offering a wishy-washy non-committal word salad. So no, he’ll be absent. Lord help the Conservative party while he’s at the helm.
Let these two ‘leaders’ hide in the closet from the big rigs, blaring horns, and burly truckers headed their way.
Time has passed for them to speak. Nobody cares about what they have to say anymore.
The people have spoken.
It’s time for the politicians and unelected bureaucrats to listen.
And with every blaring horn, the message gets stronger and clearer: Enough!
Slobodian is the Senior Manitoba Columnist for the Western Standard
SELICK: Ontario’s health minister should get a second opinion
“In normal times, doctors frequently disagree with one another. That’s why patients often do seek out second opinions. “
Ontario Health Minister Christine Elliott is apparently unfamiliar with the concept of getting a second opinion from a different doctor when the first doctor’s advice doesn’t seem to be producing the desired results.
In a widely publicized speech she made on January 19, Elliott said: “I want to respond to some extremely concerning reports that some doctors are spreading misinformation about vaccines. At a time when it’s never been more important for Ontarians to have confidence in the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, this [dissenting advice] is unacceptable. I will be sending a letter to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) urging them to do everything that is possible to put an end to this behaviour. They should consider all options in doing so, including reviewing the licenses of physicians found to be spreading misinformation.”
It is certainly true that some Ontario doctors have departed from the “must-vaccinate” narrative of the majority and the CPSO. However, it is not a mere handful that are creating such stress for the health minister. Forty MDs were already under investigation by the CPSO before Ms. Elliott expressed her wish for an even broader witch hunt.
There are many other dissenters that the CPSO has not yet targeted. For instance, a group calling itself Canadian Physicians for Science and Truth posted a declaration on May 9, 2021 responding to the CPSO’s April 30th threat to impose disciplinary action on any physician who questions or debates COVID-19 orthodoxy. The declaration has garnered 718 signatures from healthcare professionals (many of whom have shown their credentials as “MD”), as well as 20,171 signatures from ordinary citizens. Those signing the declaration accuse the CPSO of ordering physicians to depart from the scientific method by shying away from debate on scientific subjects.
Another group, the Canadian Covid Care Alliance, is more protective of the identities of its members but indicates that it is an “alliance of over 500 independent Canadian doctors, scientists, and health care providers…committed to providing quality, balanced, evidence-based information to the Canadian public about COVID-19 so that hospitalizations can be reduced, lives saved, and our country safely restored to normal as quickly as possible.”
Health Minister Elliott must surely share those goals, so why has she moved so pre-emptively and harshly to demonize a contingent of her fellow travelers? She herself is not a doctor or scientist, and not independently qualified to determine which group of doctors really does have an accurate view of the facts.
Rational people – when faced with a choice between two opposing scientific opinions – examine both of them closely and give due consideration to the viewpoints of all the people more highly credentialed than themselves. They don’t behave like Ms. Elliott did – pretending to know that one group is wrong while the other has a monopoly on truth.
In normal times, doctors frequently disagree with one another. That’s why patients often do seek out second opinions. Sometimes the second doctor, or even the third or fourth, has a more satisfactory answer than the first did.
Ms. Elliott must surely realize by now that the experts she has been relying on for the past two years have not served the people of Ontario well. It’s high time she abandoned her arrogant attitude towards those who are offering a different opinion and started listening to them instead of threatening them with the loss of their livelihoods.
Karen Selick is a columnist for the Western Standard
WAGNER: The benefits of a federal Western independence party
“As long as Albertans continue to vote Conservative federally, Justin Trudeau knows that he has nothing to worry about.”
For Alberta to become independent, there must be a provincial referendum on independence that receives a clear majority vote. For the referendum to take place, there must be a party in power willing to hold one. That requires the election of a provincial political party that favours asking Albertans whether they want to remain in Canada or choose a path towards self-determination and prosperity. The need for a provincial independence party is clear and easy to understand.
But some people ask: what about a federal Western independence party? What would be the point of that? It could neither mandate the necessary referendum nor pass federal legislation benefiting the West. Such a party therefore seems pointless, they suggest.
However, there are some clear benefits to a federal political party that should be considered.
For one thing, a federal Western independence party gives pro-independence voters an option besides the pro-federalist parties currently on offer. Patriotic Alberta voters who reject the Central Canadian parties would at least have someone they can conscientiously support. They could “vote their values,” so to speak, and send a message to Ottawa that voting for other parties doesn’t accomplish.
Right now, many independence-minded Albertans support Maxime Bernier’s People’s Party. The People’s Party has a unique and beneficial message that is attractive to conservative-minded Westerners, so that’s understandable. Bernier’s opposition to the Paris Climate Accord would mean that a Peoples’ Party federal government would eliminate the kinds of policies that prevent Western freedom and prosperity.
That is excellent, of course. However, because the People’s Party doesn’t restrict its focus to Western interests, it can’t represent the West in the same way that an exclusively Western party could. This is not to disparage the People’s Party, but simply to note that as a pan-Canadian party it must represent the interests of every region in the country, not just the West.
Having a federal independence party – such as the Maverick Party – does more than simply provide an option for Western regionalist voters. If it were to win a substantial number of votes (whether in a by-election or general election), that would alert Central Canadians to the increasing anger towards Ottawa in the West.
As long as Albertans continue to vote Conservative federally, Justin Trudeau knows he has nothing to worry about. Conservative MPs from Alberta undoubtedly sympathize with the plight of the West, but their options to help are severely constrained by the need to appeal to voters in places like Toronto, Ottawa, and Montreal. The Conservative Party wants more than anything to achieve power, and the path to power runs through Central Canada. Thus, the interests of Alberta will always be a very low priority for the Conservative Party.
In contrast, were one or more Western independence MPs to be elected, Trudeau would see the West was not just going to lie down and let him run us over. He might finally understand that his anti-oil industry policies would be met by stiff resistance and that he was in for a real fight.
Most importantly of all, though, is that the election of one or more Maverick Party MPs would provide a significant morale boost for the entire Western independence movement. There would be lots of excitement that would lead to increased support, even at the provincial level.
There’s something about an electoral victory that generates credibility, even if power is not attained by the victor. That is, even though Maverick MPs would not form government or exercise power, the fact that they received voter support would provide credibility for the independence movement as a whole. In this kind of situation, quality leaders would likely emerge who could take the movement forward.
Some people point out that there have been Bloc Québécois MPs in Ottawa for years and they have done little for Quebec. Therefore, Maverick MPs from Alberta would be just as pointless.
However, everyone expects Quebec to send separatist MPs to Ottawa. They’ve been doing that for decades. Alberta sending independence-minded MPs to Ottawa would be entirely different. The election of Maverick MPs would constitute a political earthquake that would rock the nation. It would be the Canadian news story of the decade, and it would generate new interest and energy in the Western independence movement.
In short, a federal political party could potentially play a meaningful role in the move towards Alberta independence. A federal party is not as essential as a provincial party for the independence movement to succeed, but the potential benefits it could provide should not be overlooked.
Michael Wagner is a columnist for the Western Standard
Truckers: ‘We are not separatists or terrorists’
China changes Fight Club ending to cops busting anarchists
SLOBODIAN: Manitoba response to Freedom Convoy has politicians cowering
Dr. Bonnie Henry ordered to stand trial
The Western Standard Is Back
Trudeau calls the unvaccinated racist and misogynistic extremists
- Truckers: ‘We are not separatists or terrorists’
- China changes Fight Club ending to cops busting anarchists
- SLOBODIAN: Manitoba response to Freedom Convoy has politicians cowering
- Fortune Minerals to purchase JFSL facility for $5.5 million to build cobalt refinery
- SELICK: Ontario’s health minister should get a second opinion
- Truckers: ‘We are not separatists or terrorists’ on
- SLOBODIAN: Manitoba response to Freedom Convoy has politicians cowering on
- SELICK: Ontario’s health minister should get a second opinion on
- WAGNER: The benefits of a federal Western independence party on
- Truck convoy organizer says GoFundMe cash not frozen on
Petition: No Media Bailouts
We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.
Opinion2 days ago
SLOBODIAN: Butts attempts to pit East vs West with anti-trucker tweet
News12 hours ago
Truck convoy organizer says GoFundMe cash not frozen
News2 days ago
Trucker convoy funding hits $3M
News1 day ago
WATCH: O’Toole will not be welcoming the truckers in Ottawa
News1 day ago
WATCH: Hundreds welcome trucker convoy into Calgary
News9 hours ago
Butt launches Twitter tirade on Scheer for supporting truckers
Opinion11 hours ago
MORGAN: Trucker convoy is rattling the establishment for all of us
News2 days ago
Massive, loud support displayed as BC’s truckers roll east