fbpx
Connect with us

Opinion

SPENCER FERNANDO: Ford and Kenney shed their populist skins to reveal their inner elitist

What’s the point in electing conservatives if they’ll just act like the entitled politicians they claim to oppose?”

Published

on

For many years, conservatives at the federal and provincial level have been running on two basic core ideas: reducing the control government has over your life, and fighting against entitled politicians living off your tax dollars.

While other issues come and go, those two ideas have been at the core of what conservatives promise their supporters.

It’s how they justify their fundraising asks, and how they differentiate themselves from the other parties.

In both Alberta and Ontario, the two ostensibly conservative governments explicitly ran on a populist platform of returning power to the people from the elites, and ending the entitlement that was perceived to have characterized those they defeated.

Federally, the Conservatives regularly rail against Justin Trudeau’s entitlement, slamming the perception that he believes the rules apply to everyone else, but not to him.

And yet, we are watching and seeing that Conservative politicians are turning out to be a bunch of entitled hypocrites, who demonstrate the same behaviour they attack in others.

In Alberta, eight MLAs, and other UCP officials – including Jason Kenney’s Chief of Staff – travelled outside of Canada during the Christmas season, at a time when the government has told everyone to avoid ‘non-essential travel,’ made it illegal to have dinner with their families, threatened fines and violent force against “violators”, and imposed a reckless second lockdown that is destroying small businesses.

In response to this display of elitist entitlement, Jason Kenney said he would not sanction those officials on his team who travelled. In his view, there is one set of rules for (his) politicians, and another set of rules for the rest of us.

That’s textbook entitlement; exactly what so many Conservatives (rightfully) accuse the Liberals and NDP of.

In Ontario, Doug Ford gave a massive gift to big box stores, letting them stay open while shuttering small businesses. Twice. Ford regularly talked about how bad he felt about doing it, then kept on doing it, even as government’s own data showed an extremely low risk of infection from small businesses. Where COVID-19 is more likely to spread – in big box stores – Ford has left things mostly open for business.

Ford has also purged people like Belinda Karahalios who had the guts to stand up against increasing government power, despite Ford having previously promised not to kick people out in those circumstances. He already had in the case of libertarian-populist Randy Hillier.

Then, things reached peak arrogance when Ontario Finance Minister Rod Phillips went on a Caribbean vacation while Ontarians were locked down, which he then tried to hide to by sending pre-recorded social media posts as if he was locked down at home, and releasing a Christmas message praising the sacrifice of Ontarians as he was really living it up on the beach.

Ford initially acted as if he was outraged at the ‘revelation,’ but it then turned out he knew about it two weeks ago.

After an immediate firestorm of controversy – including from conservative supporters – Ford was left with no choice but to fire Phillips.  

Of course, Ford only had a problem with Phillips’ vacation when it caused political problems for him. He apparently thought nothing of how disgusting it is for Ontarians to be locked down away from their families while the same politicians pushing the lockdowns are going on vacations overseas with their own families.

To get a sense of how insane this all is, consider this tweet by @Martyupnorth_:

“Am I understanding this correctly?  If 10 members of my family flew to Hawaii and had a big Christmas party, without masks, for a week, I could go to work upon my return to Alberta, as long as I “voluntarily” isolated for 14 days.  But I couldn’t have that same party here in AB?”

This upside-down world is the kind of arbitrary abuse of government power that would be expected from those obsessed with more government power.

How are these Kenney and Ford ‘conservatives’ acting any better right now than the Trudeau Liberals?

Conservative politicians by contrast, portrayed themselves as different, as people who would respect individual freedom and tear down the entitlements of the left.

Just ask yourself this question:

What would be the difference, right now, if Rachel Notley was in power in Alberta, and Andrea Horwath was in power in Ontario?

Would they have been more restrictive than the Tories?

Would they have done more, or less for small businesses that have been shut down?

Would they have taken any more freedoms away?

Chances are, those two NDP leaders would be acting just as the two Tory premiers are right now. 

You may be wondering why I’m focusing on conservative hypocrisy here. Haven’t all the parties been hypocrites? 

Of course.

After all, we just saw NDP MP Niki Ashton announce that she was in Greece to visit her sick grandmother, despite most non-governmental Canadians being unable to see their own sick relatives within Canada.

Yet, to his credit, NDP leader Jagmeet Singh acted quickly in that case, removing her from her critic roles, while Doug Ford only fired Rod Philips after it became public, and Jason Kenney has, well, done nothing whatsoever. 

For all their elitist trappings, Singh was tougher with a hypocrite in his own ranks, than ‘populist’ Kenney and Ford have been with the much worse hypocrites in their own.

The issue is that those conservative politicians explicitly promote themselves as anti-establishment.

A key feature of their appeal is that they will not abuse our taxpayer dollars and will seek to protect our freedoms.

Instead, when the chips were down, they have often betrayed what they claimed to stand for, using government to restrict our rights, crushing local businesses while protecting global corporate power, and exempting themselves and fellow politicians from the damage and pain the rest of us are dealing with.

That kind of betrayal is enough to make people ask a very simple, and – for the conservatives – dangerous question:

If conservative politicians act just as bad as they claim the Liberals and NDP are acting, why the hell should anyone vote conservative?

Free-thinking voices within Canada’s conservative parties (if any are left), must come up with an answer to that question, and they must do so fast.

Spencer Fernando is a columnist for the Western Standard and the owner/author of spencerfernando.com from Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Continue Reading
7 Comments

7 Comments

  1. That's Dr. #SAND to you...

    January 4, 2021 at 3:53 pm

    Almost all politicians are liberals at heart.
    They all believe that more government is the answer.
    That is why they are in government.

  2. Warren Leigh

    January 4, 2021 at 10:06 am

    I do agree with other comments in this thread that call for a political revolution. However, that revolution does not have to involve violence of any kind, against either people or property. Instead, it can be entirely peaceful. The revolution we need is to disband political parties. Period. Full Stop. No matter which side of the spectrum they claim to be on. This revolution would only turn violent if elitists themselves refuse to give up their power and decided to violently suppress it, which is entirely possible, but it would be utterly needless and would only turn these so-called leaders from elitists into murderers.

    It’s political parties that create the oligarchy rule of elitist leaders who don’t live by their own rules. It’s political parties that allow candidates to get elected without even knowing their name. Parties allow candidates to get elected simply because they have the right brand name, logo and colors on their campaign signs, without any examination of merit, character or previous accomplishments in life before politics. Parties started out with good intentions, but they inevitably became all-powerful and their usefulness has now run its course. This is true not just in Alberta, Ontario or even Canada as a whole, but all over the world.

    • Kieran

      January 4, 2021 at 11:02 am

      Frankly speaking Canada has the most obsolete political system among developed nations now. Even the UK (whose system we copied) slowly drifts away from good old Westminster. I hate to say, but Canadian “separation of powers” and public representation looks very naive in 21st century. It was created when right to vote were very limited and requires high level of responsibility from voters to be effective. We have seen how even humble 2014 Reform Act was quickly deprived of power not only by party leaders (which is natural) but also by ordinary MPs who was supposed to be extremely interested to get more independence. And general public apathetically ignored the process. Honestly I doubt any changes possible in that direction without wide political movement and direct actions. But no right-wing leader can think outside that box – every time we hear the same: let’s make a political party, win elections first then we’ll see what to do. So pathetic 🙁

  3. David Elson

    January 4, 2021 at 8:39 am

    A political revolution is absolutely necessary.

  4. Léa Maro Langelier

    January 3, 2021 at 9:46 pm

    Alberta did not vote Conservative when it rallied support for the UCP. It voted for a bunch of Profiteers who took advantage of the fact that Alberta has, and probably will always be, a Conservative Province. Since the election began, there has been a lot of evidence that Kenney had absolutely no intention of actually doing much of anything. He just wanted to be ‘in charge’. Running for the UCP and winning Alberta was far too easy. People were touting it the second the NDP were elected. All they had to do was ‘Unite the Right’ and they were in. The Leader of the Party could have been a Siamese Fighting Fish in a Goldfish bowl and it would have won. It’s like few were actually paying attention to who was running in their riding. Or what they knew. Or what they intended. So a bunch of Cons got in, yeah? Look, frankly, I don’t vote Conservative because there are some things I personally disagree with regarding the ‘party platform in general’, but I’ve lived in Alberta for 20 or so years and I can assure you of one thing: I don’t mind if a Conservative is in power. What I do mind is when there’s a rush to ensure something is plugged, rather than fixed. And the Conservative Party in Alberta seriously needed fixing. Still needs fixing. Please ensure that those who vote know who they’re voting for and what they’re about before marking an X. Even if the wanna be official offers you a beer.

  5. Mars Hill

    January 3, 2021 at 9:04 pm

    Spence is spot on; both of these turkeys are an embarrassment to ‘conservatives’ values….no wonder Turdeau is thinking of calling an election, O’Toole from what I can see is cut from the same cloth. Sloan and Bernier seem to be the best best out there right now, maybe L Lewis.

  6. Kieran

    January 3, 2021 at 4:56 pm

    The iron law of oligarchy works always, exclusion are very rare. Jason Kenney raised in the same cartel political system as Trudeau the Second – why should we expect different behavior from him?

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Opinion

MAKICHUK: Defection of Chinese rocket scientist a huge blow to Beijing

The scientist, in his 30s, says he possesses detailed information about the hypersonic glide vehicle — on the face of it, a gold-plated defection.

mm

Published

on

It reads like something out of a spy novel.

A Chinese rocket scientist deftly approaches a member of MI6 intelligence service in Hong Kong, with the intention of defecting.

The scientist, in his 30s, says he possesses detailed information about the hypersonic glide vehicle — on the face of it, a gold-plated defection.

But is he for real or is he a Chinese intelligence plant, a bogus agent setting them up for the big fall?

In today’s spy game one never quite knows. 

But this time, it turned out to be the real deal … and talk about a major-league intelligence coup.

According to a report in UK’s Express newspaper last night, and quoting confidential sources, MI6 played a key role in helping a senior Chinese scientist to the West.

His escape is a huge blow to Beijing, sources said, allowing both Britain and the US to accelerate defensive programs against the use of hypersonic missiles. 

Worse yet for Xi Jinping’s military juggernaut, it could also take China years to tweak its systems and “render this intelligence ineffective,” sources said.

Described as a rocket technician, the Chinese national was attached to the state-owned Aviation Industry Corp of China, where he helped develop a mid-range hypersonic boost-glide vehicle capable of carrying DF-17 missiles to a range of up to 2,000 miles, the Express reported.

Sources say the scientist is also connected with a more recent ground-breaking hypersonic missile delivery system that can circle the globe before descending from space and use heat-seeking technology to strike any target on Earth.

The science community would call it a “Sputnik moment” after the Soviet satellite breakthrough in the late 1950s, while others said the launch of another warhead from the device was “scientifically impossible.”

While Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley stopped short of the Sputnik comparison, he acknowledged “it’s very close to that” — a fact that no doubt rocked the Pentagon.

Milley called the test of the weapon “a very significant technological event” that’s just one element of China’s growing military strength.

To have any inside inkling, whatsoever, as to how China achieved this, would be a huge boost to US military contractors and designers.

Why did he defect? 

Well, it had nothing to do with political dissent toward his Beijing masters or some higher calling of compassion and humanity. It seldom is.

Usually, it’s about money or the lure of the western lifestyle.

Rather, sources said it was a deep resentment at having been passed over for promotion, that drove him to make contact with a British intelligence asset in Hong Kong last year. 

During that first, tentative approach, he told the middleman he possessed detailed information about the hypersonic glide vehicle. 

The claim would set off alarm bells at Vauxhall Cross, the London HQ of the Secret Intelligence Service, more commonly known as MI6.

Knowing he faced a firing squad if discovered, he demanded asylum for himself and his wife and child, sources said.

Extractions like this are difficult, but possible. They require absolute secrecy and exceptional tradecraft.

A three-person team, comprised of two intelligence officers and a technical specialist, were readied to deploy to Hong Kong. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was also duly informed of the walk-in.

It was a huge gamble, operating in China’s backyard, but MI6 officials thought the payoff was worth the risk.

Cautious the scientist could be a Beijing plant, a cat-and-mouse game developed over the next few days in which the scientist’s credentials were “copperbottomed” — the English way of saying “guaranteed.”

It was during this process that the technician — an avid fan of cricket who is believed to have once studied in England — began to reveal select details about China’s latest hypersonic development, the Express reported.

Eventually, a plan was hatched in which he and his family would travel to the former British colony using a specially developed route. 

Once there, the scientist was spirited to a secure location where he was debriefed by the two men and a woman who made up the special MI6 team.

While most of the technical information offered by the scientist was carried in his head, he was also able to smuggle out technical data, the Express reported. 

The MI6 team were joined by a two-man team from the CIA. A day was given over for a lengthy debriefing before arrangements were made to fly to a more secure location — a US air base in Germany — then on to America via the UK.

According to Scientific American, hypersonic weapons are touted not only for their speed but also for their stealth and maneuverability. 

Intercontinental ballistic missiles, which follow an elliptical path into space before plunging down toward their target, reach speeds above Mach 20, but they have predictable trajectories for most of their flight and typically can maneuver only briefly, after they reenter the atmosphere. 

In contrast, hypersonic weapons would fly deep within the atmosphere most of the time, using lift generated by airflow to weave around and try to evade interceptors. 

Approaching at such low altitudes, these weapons would avoid detection by ground-based radar systems until close to their target, making them more difficult, if not impossible to stop.

Both China and Russia are far ahead in this technology, a concern that has forced the US to spend billions on hypersonic development. So far, however, a series of high-profile failures has derailed this progress.

A defection of this importance could help reverse America’s record of hypersonic disappointment.

Speaking about the defection, an intelligence source told the Express: “He was extremely co-operative. This is an intelligent man; a man who keenly follows cricket, but prefers Jack Daniels to lager, a man who has played a key role in the development of hypersonic weapons in China, and a man who felt aggrieved by the way he had been treated.

“His decision to make contact wasn’t taken on ideological grounds but rather in a firm belief that his talents should be recognized and more greatly appreciated.”

The source added: “The fact we are in possession of certain details about the operational capability of this hypersonic glide missile puts us in a position we did not expect to be in at this time.

“It will probably buy us two years. We estimate it will take China two years to be able to make changes in its program sufficiently substantial as to render this intelligence ineffective. In this sphere, two years is a very long time.”

Dave Makichuk is a Western Standard contributor
He has worked in the media for decades, including as an editor for the Calgary Herald. He is also the Calgary correspondent for ChinaFactor.news and has covered Asian military affairs for years.
makichukd@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Opinion

MORGAN: 10 days of living free south of the border

“Canada remains in a state of absurd regulation and induced panic.”

mm

Published

on

Back in 1987 I had the opportunity to tour parts of the Soviet Union during its waning days as an empire. The experience contributed greatly to the political outlooks I hold today. There is nothing like a good dose of seeing extreme socialism firsthand to develop an aversion to that broken ideology.

The creaking, groaning Aeroflot jet deposited us on the Moscow airport runway with a slam. While the jet was serviceable and Aeroflot’s safety record was safe — as far as we were allowed to know — it was truly a no frills ride. The service was gruff, the interior dilapidated, and the flight rough. It was much like everything else in the Soviet Union. You got the bare basics in service and had no other provider to compare the service to.

Customs were typical and thorough as all of our bags were searched. What was unusual was the contraband the customs agents were searching for. Rather than drugs or weapons as is typical at borders, what the Soviet agents sought were books, magazines, and cassette tapes.

The top priority for Soviet customs agents was the prevention of outside information getting to the eyes and ears of the citizenry.

Citizen defections were growing along with general unrest against the state. As news from the outside world trickled in, people in Soviet Russia began to realize they didn’t need to live as they had been.

Nobody was starving when I toured Russia. People weren’t homeless or unemployed. It was indeed a socialist paradise as far as providing basic human needs was concerned. Life was drab and miserable though. Everything from the endless rows of apartment towers to the dull standardized clothing was unremarkable and depressing. Food was plentiful but it was bland and without variety. You ate to survive, not to enjoy yourself.

People in Soviet Russia had become accustomed to having their lives controlled. They accepted the reality that the state would tell them where to work, how to live, and where they could travel. They all shared fear of all authority figures. Police carried no weapons as nobody would dare defy them for fear of the repercussions from the state later.

People in the Soviet Union were not living; they were surviving. The only thing keeping the empire from crumbling was the maintenance of the illusion it wasn’t better anywhere else. As long as citizens didn’t know how life was outside of the Communist Bloc, they remained content, though unhappy. This was why the government worked so hard to ensure the populace never knew any better. In the German “Democratic Republic” (East Germany), the regime did its best to block the radio and television signal from just a few blocks away.

Eventually, the dam broke. Information and consumer goods continued to leak into the Soviet Union despite the best efforts of the government. Pressure from within finally brought the USSR to an end as citizens realized they no longer had to live this way and a better world existed outside of their borders.

While Canadians are hardly living in conditions as miserable as those of the Soviet Union, we are living under severe restrictions and within a fear-filled and unhappy existence right now while many, if not most, don’t realize it doesn’t have to be this way.

I just returned from a 10-day road trip throughout the United States. Aside from seeing the sporadic and voluntary use of masks, it was hard to tell that to the north governments acted as if it was a wartime emergency. People were relaxed while dining together, events were at full capacity and conversations are actually being held on matters unrelated to COVID-19. Life is damn near how it was two years ago down there and their world isn’t ending because of it, at least in the states I visited.

COVID-19 still exists in the United States and they are still experiencing challenges due to it. Infections are being watched and health care facilities are under pressure. Political battles between authoritarians and libertarians are going on and some people are still fearful of the virus. Overall though, people in much of the United States have moved on with their lives and are no longer letting the COVID-19 pandemic dominate every aspect of their existence. It was so refreshing to live like that again, if only for a scant 10 days.

Canada remains in a state of absurd regulation and government/media induced panic. Legacy/mainstream media continues with the most negative of headlines and works its hardest to maintain a state of induced terror. Governments jealously cling to the control they have taken in the name of controlling COVID-19 and maintaining the narrative of doom and gloom. They cling to the fiction COVID can be defeated like an enemy state signing a treaty of surrender.

The dreaded Omicron variant has thankfully turned into a dud. It hasn’t overwhelmed hospitals and fatalities are at a level akin to the common flu. The way Canada is responding, though, one would think leprosy is making a reappearance among the public. The population is divided while the hysteria, prejudice, and even hate against the unvaccinated have reached appalling levels.

Much of why the government and its authoritarians backers are getting away with this in Canada is because the public doesn’t know any better. They don’t realize a free, enjoyable world exists but a short distance away.

Border restrictions at this point are downright useless. Omicron is spreading like wildfire and no restrictions or vaccinations are doing a thing to hinder the transmission. What the border restrictions do accomplish, however, is keeping Canadians from bothering with traveling outside the country. The testing requirements are a pain the ass and a person could find themselves quarantined at their own expense for a variant that has proven itself to be quite mild. What information Canadians do receive from south of the border, is framed by the government’s proxies in the media as a selfish frenzy built atop a mountain of dead bodies.

There were no restrictions going into the USA by the way. That exchange at the border only took a couple of minutes and vaccinations or testing never even came up. It’s only in coming back to Canada where all the grief is occurring.

So why haven’t the border restrictions been lifted?

I suspect the government wants to keep the number of Canadians going into and returning with news of the outside world as limited as possible. Yes, we can see the packed football stadiums in the USA and can find out just how unrestricted they are down there with even some cursory internet research. Nothing beats having a friend or family member tell you directly how nice it is to live free again though. Those sorts of exchanges between people foster discontent.

Things won’t change until Canadians stand up for themselves. Governments never willingly relinquish the control they have taken. We can’t allow ourselves to fall into a docile existence plodding along through a mediocre life under government control as people in the former Eastern Bloc did.

Canadians need to know it’s better outside of the borders. Even the UK is dropping restrictions while we aren’t even discussing easing our own.

Ignore the government statements. Turn off the mainstream media and reach out to a family member or friend who is or has been outside of Canada lately. You will hear the same story I’m telling.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

As soon as enough Canadians get that message, we will be able to start fighting our way back to normal living again.

Cory Morgan is Assistant Opinion & Broadcast Editor for the Western Standard
cmorgan@westernstandardonline.com

Continue Reading

Opinion

MAKICHUK: Russia’s ‘ball of hate’ is rolling toward Ukraine

“A normal exercise requires notification 42 days in advance if you’re talking about 9,000 troops, right?  Normal – and 13,000 requires international observers. That’s what normal looks like. What this is, is something entirely different.”

mm

Published

on

The ball of hate.

That’s what they called, NHLer Pat Verbeek.

Let me say that again. The ball of hate.

Trust me, when he was on the ice you didn’t want to be there. He made your life a living hell. 

He shoved sticks into your teeth, he shoved elbows at your jaw, he slammed you into the boards, he did anything he could to defeat you, and then some.

Strangely enough, the man spent as much time celebrating goals as sitting in the penalty box.

Think Gordie Howe was tough?

According to NHL.com, the native of Sarnia, Ont., finished his 20-season NHL career with 522 goals and 2,905 penalty minutes, by far the most of any member of the league’s 500-goal club.

And get this … the New Jersey Devils selected Verbeek in the third round (No. 43) of the 1982 NHL Draft. 

He made his NHL debut against the New York Rangers on March 21, 1983 and scored his first goal three nights later against the Washington Capitals.

Bang! Not only could he score, but he could also run your head into the boards and leave you wondering WTF happened.

He played “on the edge” and made no apologies for his chippy style.

The Zebras didn’t like this, of course and did what Zebras do. 

You can’t play like that anymore in today’s NHL. The bleeding hearts have changed the game.

The same goes for politics and foreign affairs — we have become soft. Very, very soft. And by we, I mean the West. 

We are so busy trying to be politically correct, we forgot how we got here in the first place.

And this is exactly why another ball of hate, a far more infamous one — an iron-handed dictator who calls himself a president, Vladimir Putin — is exploiting those Western weaknesses as I pen this.

I mean, it couldn’t be more obvious, could it?

According to Joseph Trevithick at The Drive, the Russian Ministry of Defense confirmed that six amphibious warfare ships that left the Baltic Sea this week are heading to the Mediterranean Sea, where they say these vessels will take part in “naval exercises.” 

Clearly, this amphibious flotilla could potentially swing north into the Black Sea, which would put them in a position to support a possible large-scale Russian intervention into Ukraine.

The language the Russian ministry of defense used to describe these naval drills is similar in many respects to how the Kremlin has described the nature of large-scale exercises in Belarus that are scheduled to start next month. 

The massive deployments of troops and materiel, including Iskander short-range ballistic missiles and combat aircraft, associated with those drills have drawn concern.

Speaking to reporters this week, a senior US State Department said: “What concerns us is the total picture, right? [Russia] is … amassing 100,000 troops along Ukraine’s borders combined with moving forces into Belarus over the weekend, it is — it is — these numbers are beyond, of course, what we would expect with regard to a normal exercise, right?

“A normal exercise requires notification 42 days in advance if you’re talking about 9,000 troops, right?  Normal and 13,000 requires international observers. That’s what normal looks like. What this is, is something entirely different.”

As part of the build-up, Russia deployed more aircraft closer to the border, which raised fears of a significant air component. Two to three dozen Sukhov-34 fighter jets have joined helicopters positioned near Ukraine, CNN reported.

As if to confirm this action, Britain’s capable MI6 intelligence service revealed it has discovered a plan by President Putin to install a pro-Moscow puppet leader in Ukraine, Foreign Secretary Liz Truss said this weekend.

As Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky warned of a ‘”large-scale war,” Truss said that Yevhen Murayev was being lined up to run the country as a satellite of Moscow.

Murayev, a media owner, lost his seat in the Ukrainian parliament when his party failed to secure 5% of the vote in the 2019 elections, BBC News reported.

He has roundly denied the report.

“It isn’t very logical. I’m banned from Russia. Not only that, but money from my father’s firm there has been confiscated,” Murayev told The Guardian.

There are other troubling indicators:

Diplomatic talks between the US, European allies and Russia ended last week without a clear path to de-escalate tensions, media outlets reported. Russia’s deputy foreign minister, Sergei Ryabkov, called the talks a “dead end.”

Some military experts believe this was what Putin wanted all along — setting it up to fail by making unrealistic demands, beyond just keeping NATO out of Ukraine. All it did was buy time for the Russians to set up their “false flag” invasion of neighbouring Ukraine.

Canadian special forces operators have also been deployed to Ukraine as part of an attempt by NATO allies to deter Russian aggression and to identify ways to assist the Ukrainian government, Global News reported.

The unit has also been tasked with helping to develop evacuation plans for Canadian diplomatic personnel in the event of a full-scale invasion, sources said.

They wouldn’t be doing that if they didn’t have good intelligence from the US.

To staunch the inevitable bloodbath, the defense ministers of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania announced they received approvals from Washington to send US-made anti-tank weaponry to Ukraine, BreakingDefense reported.

Estonia will provide Javelin anti-armor missiles, while Lithuania and Latvia will provide Stinger anti-aircraft missiles and adjacent equipment. Latvia will also send military meals ready-to-eat for the Ukrainian forces.

While Ukraine has already been building a stockpile of Javelin weapons, the inclusion of Stingers represents a new capability for the Ukrainian military, one that could take out Russian helicopters if needed.

Britain also said this week it had begun supplying Ukraine with anti-tank weapons, along with a group of around 30 elite British troops, Sky News reported.

The members of the Ranger Regiment — part of the army’s newly-formed Special Operations Brigade — flew out on military planes that also airlifted a total of some 2,000 anti-tank missile launchers to the country.

The US State Department has also approved the transfer of five Russian-made Mi-17 Hip helicopters that had belonged to the now-defunct Afghan Air Force to the Ukrainian armed forces, according to CNN.

The CIA continues to operate an intelligence collection training program for Ukrainian special operators and intelligence officials, current and former officials familiar with the program said. The program was first reported by Yahoo News.

The threat of further sanctions — in fact, a green light for the Russians, if anything — has forced the Biden administration to weigh new options, including providing more arms to Ukraine to try to raise the costs for a potential invasion.

The recent confusion over statements made by President Joe Biden on Ukraine haven’t really helped either.

Is it a price, Putin is willing to pay? We shall know, soon enough.

For their part, Ukrainian officials are vowing to fight.

“We prepared a response for each scenario,” an official told CNN.

“We are going to fight if something happens. Our people are ready to fight. Every window will shoot if [Russians] go [in].”

God help them.

Dave Makichuk is a Western Standard contributor
He has worked in the media for decades, including as an editor for the Calgary Herald. He is also the Calgary correspondent for ChinaFactor.news and has written about military affairs for decades
makichukd@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Share

Petition: No Media Bailouts

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

1,180 signatures

No Media Bailouts

The fourth estate is critical to a functioning democracy in holding the government to account. An objective media can't maintain editorial integrity when it accepts money from a government we expect it to be critical of.

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

**your signature**



The Western Standard will never accept government bailout money. By becoming a Western Standard member, you are supporting government bailout-free and proudly western media that is on your side. With your support, we can give Westerners a voice that doesn\'t need taxpayers money.

Share this with your friends:

Trending

Copyright © Western Standard New Media Corp.