Connect with us


MORGAN: The media sure shut up fast once Nenshi got caught up in the Snowbird Scandal

“But how are we supposed to trust a mainstream media that attacks Kenney with fury, while it gives a complete pass to Nenshi over the same issue?”




I am old enough to remember when the Great Snowbird Scandal was the top of the news in Alberta. For well over a week it burned white hot. You couldn’t turn on your radio, TV or read a publication without seeing headlines on the issue. The hypocrisy was unbearable. Albertans on all sides of the spectrum were furious as they saw jet-setting MLAs & staffers travelling to tropical just as the locked their constituents down over Christmas.

The questions kept coming.

“Did Premier Kenney do enough?”

“Should Kenney kick all of the offending MLAs out of caucus?”

“What did Kenney know, and when did he know it?”

“Did Kenney lie?”

“Should Kenney resign?”

A major publication even wrote an entire story on how the Twitter hashtag ‘#ResignKenney’ was trending. The social media mob was swarming and they wanted blood. They would not rest without more heads on more pikes. Kenney went underground, but with every day he was missing, the scandal only seemed to burn hotter.

And then suddenly…. poof! It all disappeared.

It was as if a switch was tripped. The entire issue was suddenly something that was behind us. It was time to move on to other issues. The media was reporting on new stories and the mob – at least the mob on the left – was gone. Poof!

So what happened?

Naheed Nenshi is what happened.

The Calgary mayor was found to have pulled off the same hypocritical stunt that Premier Jason Kenney had. Nenshi’s handpicked Chief of Staff had travelled to Hawaii over the holidays with the Mayor’s knowledge and blessing. Nenshi gave a short statement saying that civil servants should not be held responsible in the same way as elected officials and that he would not fire his chief of staff, as Premier Kenney had. Now that the scandal had touched one of their progressive darlings, the mainstream media decided that it was no longer a story worth covering and slinked away. No follow-up questions, no demands for blood. It was time to move on.

Let’s be clear. A chief of staff is not a civil servant. We are not talking about a bus driver or administrative worker at city hall. A chief of staff is the right-hand man or woman of the elected official they were chosen by. They are political staff. A chief of staff works directly with their boss on the messaging and implementation of policy.

Nenshi’s chief of staff was right in the thick of things when Nenshi demanded that the provincial government lock us all down. Nenshi’s chief of staff helped communicate all of Nenhi’s chiding “stay home, save lives” statements and the chief of staff is privy to meetings where it is decided that police should crack down on kids playing hockey. The chief of staff was surely right behind Mayor Nenshi when he called on Calgarians to snitch upon their neighbours. The chief of staff should be held accountable for his or her actions.

There will be no accountability in Calgary over the hypocrisy. Nenshi is feeling no pressure from this and the media has given him a pass.

For all Kenney’s hypocrisy in this during his government’s own lockdown, Nenshi was even more militant in demanding draconian closures with draconian punishments.

The gross double-standard being practiced by the mainstream media should be noted and remembered. Have no doubt, Premier Jason Kenney has been the architect of much of his own misery. He deserves what he got, and the media should continue to ask questions about his truthfulness in the matter.

But how are we supposed to trust a mainstream media that attacks Kenney with fury, while it gives a complete pass to Nenshi over the same issue?

Calgary is going into a municipal election year and we can be assured that Mayor Nenshi will yet again get an easy ride from the mainstream media. It is going to be tough for up and comers to challenge an incumbent with the government-funded press on his side.

Thankfully, new media outlets like the Western Standard and others are allowing citizens to bypass the establishment media who feel that they are the gatekeepers of information. With each act of hypocrisy, the mainstream media loses a little more credibility and loses another part of their audience.

While I will call the mainstream media out on it, I don’t want them to stop. They are dinosaurs of a dying and obsolete information medium. Let’s just keep giving them rope and let them finish the job themselves. Eventually, no government subsidies will matter as there will no longer be an audience

Cory Morgan is the Podcast Editor and a columnist for the Western Standard

Continue Reading


  1. Charles Martell III

    January 14, 2021 at 12:11 pm

    And the FakeStream Media only too happy to come along . . . Obama approved this indoctrination . . .

    Beijing-Linked Group Tries to Sway US Media With Reporter Trips, Dinners With Execs

    and it’s NO Different in Canada folks . . . with our Corporate Controlled fakestream media!

  2. Guest

    January 12, 2021 at 5:51 am

    Nenshi’s Chief of Staff should have faced the same fate as Premier Kenney’s. Mayor Nenshi did the bullshit two step and thinks we all bought into his hypocrisy. Well the liberal media has, but I hope the bullshit Mayor takes his golden pensions and goes. Calgary can’t afford you bye 👋🏻 ❗️

  3. Mars Hill

    January 11, 2021 at 12:03 am

    Are people waking up to the fact the the ccp cabal controls the media in Canada and around the world, support their agenda or else….I’m really hoping Canada in not one of the 22 countries helping the USA in the Q military operation going on, if they’re not it’s possible JT will wind up in handcuffs.

    • Ah Jaysus

      January 12, 2021 at 8:56 am

      Q LOL. Total psy-op.

  4. Ron Voss

    January 10, 2021 at 5:15 pm

    Well said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


SLOBODIAN: Disgraced Catholic priest banned from Northern Manitoba reserves

Father Rheal Forest accused residential school survivors of fabricating abuse claims to cash in on settlement money.




A Catholic priest could land himself in the back of an RCMP cruiser if he steps foot on a Manitoba First Nation he served and lived on for years.

Father Rheal Forest, who accused residential school survivors of fabricating abuse claims to cash in on settlement money, will be considered a trespasser in Bloodvein First Nation, located 210 km north of Winnipeg.

A Band Council Resolution (BCR) barring Forest from the community is being drafted and when signed this week by council will be given to RCMP to enforce, Bloodvein Chief Derek Cook confirmed.

“I know a lot of people are upset. It’s bringing back a lot of the stories they have to deal with and are continuing to deal with from residential schools,” Cook told CBC.

“I hope he abides by the process and respects our decision.”

Despite not having worked in Bloodvein for a few years, Forest continued to visit.

The Archdiocese of St. Boniface also banned Forest from all preaching and teaching for remarks he made about residential school survivors in sermons last month while filling in for a vacationing priest at Winnipeg’s St. Emile Roman Catholic Church.

The sermons that were live-streamed at the time to Facebook have been removed.

“If they wanted extra money, from the money that was given to them, they had to lie sometimes, lie that they were abused sexually and, oop, another $50,000,” Forest told the congregation.

“It’s kind of hard if you’re poor not to lie.”

Forest also absolved priests and nuns from any abuse and blamed laymen.

Anywhere from $3 billion to $4.7 billion has been paid to thousands of people who claimed they were victims of abuse at residential schools.

Almost 50 churches have been burned and desecrated in Canada since unmarked graves were allegedly discovered on former residential school sites.

Foster also made controversial comments during one mass about the criminals responsible for the destruction.

He admitted to having “thoughts of anger” when he passed by a church that had been vandalized.

“If I had a shotgun at night and I’d see them, I’d go ‘Boom’ just to scare them and if they don’t run away, I’ll shoot them,” he said laughing.

He immediately added: “This would not help. It’s bad to do that. I’d go have a chat with them.”

Forest also made it clear he is not a fan of the “evil” media which he said is controlled by Freemasons. 

Slobodian is the Senior Manitoba Columnist for the Western Standard


Continue Reading


GIEDE: Happy 150th British Columbia!

“It’s been a tumultuous 150 years, but this province is still the Most Beautiful Place on Earth.”




BC Flag

While everywhere else in Canada it’s simply known as “August long weekend,” technically speaking the statutory holiday is called “British Columbia Day” west of the Rockies. For those of us who enjoy official designations and labels, this will be the sesquicentennial of BC’s entrance into Canadian confederation, a much harassed political project within these pages. Still, a century-and-a-half is worthy of exhortation.

Of course the proper birthday was July 20, corresponding with our joining up in 1871. But no one in BC is interested in a bon fete they cannot properly observe with beverage in hand. Thus, BC Day has been permanently tacked to the first Monday of August to ensure an annual long weekend in perpetuity – which is how all significant non-religious holidays ought to be scheduled from sea to sea to sea.

British Columbia was bribed into confederation by a drunk Scotsman who dreamed of transcontinental railways.

We almost broke out again when the delivery of the Canadian Pacific Railway seemed doomed, and would of likely joined the United States, which had a sizable ex-patriot population here (particularly Civil War veterans from the South.) We stayed on with the reassurance the CPR would be finished, even returning Sir John A. Macdonald to Parliament from Victoria once after he lost his seat in Kingston, Ont.

Of course, our 150 birthday as a province has also been overshadowed by pandemic, then the church fires, and now the wildfires which rage throughout the Southern Interior. British Columbians will still be cracking our famous IPA’s despite the smoke, but perhaps being seen to be celebrating our legacy in such dire times is too much for even our self-aggrandizing political class to bear, let alone the rest of us.

British Columbia is a series of paradoxes. While sovereigntist fervor is most strongly felt east of the Rockies, particularly in Wildrose country, only BC has the surest chance of ever leaving the Dominion with its borders intact: save for minor disputes with America along the coast, our borders are the same as when we took up Sir John A.’s invitation, unlike the rest of the West. Yet this does not motivate us.

If anything, the peculiar history and geography of the Western cordillera makes separation from itself just as likely as a break at the federal level. Outside of the Lower Mainland and South Island, people are far more different than they are similar, despite waving the same flag. Each part of British Columbia is a land entirely unto itself: river valleys, plateaus, and atolls all littered with dozens of siloed cultures.

This is not a new phenomena or collateral damage due to the post rural-urban divide: before contact, a plethora of indigenous languages flourished; after contact, successive waves of development happened at different rates throughout the province – the fur trade, gold rush, railway, forestry, mining, and finally oil and gas, as well as hydro – layering BC with company towns, ghost towns, and peculiar infrastructure.

Our vehicle fleets are by far the oldest of the provinces, just as independent contractors number more greatly amongst our workforce than nearly everywhere else in Canada. Economic cycles strike our province without uniformity, as there’s always some other resource that needs extracting from her natural bounty. Considering the remoteness, BC really could be considered the “fourth Territory.”

Perhaps this latent independence is what makes the manifestation of sovereignty so difficult.

There are more eccentrics per square kilometre here than anywhere else on God’s green earth, and each of them can tell you exactly whats wrong — as well as how to fix the place. Without a central tenet of BC identity, just thousands of caricatures brought to life in every quarter, from marijuana addicts to moral puritans, there is no single point of focus for British Columbians to rally around within the separation agenda.

But perhaps the key to understanding British Columbians lax attitude about sticking it to Ottawa is we’re too busy enjoying where we live, even as costs rise egregiously. While living in a closet west of Hope isn’t my jam, people do it by the thousands just to enjoy the Lower Mainland lifestyle; and in the rest of the province the water and wilderness goes on for eternity, beckoning every kind of adventurer.

Not unlike the wild child we all knew in class, British Columbia cannot be marshalled easily to march in step with her sister provinces, West of Lakehead on the secession question. Until confederation impedes the natural freedoms we enjoy in BC, federalism by convenience will rule the day. No doubt, its been a tumultuous 150 years, but this province is still the Most Beautiful Place on Earth.

Nathan Giede is the BC Affairs Columnist and the host of Mountain Standard Time

Continue Reading


WAGNER: The prominent Toronto political scientist who called Communism ‘democratic’

As it turns out, some members of Canada’s Left have a fairly positive view of communism.




Some commentators have noted the silence of Canada’s Left in the face of anti-government protests in Cuba. Why the reluctance to condemn a communist dictatorship?

Well, as it turns out, some members of Canada’s Left have a fairly positive view of communism. One such prominent Canadian leftist was C.B. Macpherson (1911-1987), an internationally-renowned political scientist who taught political theory at the University of Toronto. Among other things, he was especially known for his critiques of capitalism and individualism.

Interestingly, Macpherson also defended Soviet Communism as genuine democracy in action. This can be seen in a series of CBC radio messages he delivered in 1965 that were subsequently published as a book entitled The Real World of Democracy. These lectures argued there were three forms of government that could be legitimately called democracies: the liberal democracies of the West, the Soviet bloc countries, and the one-party states of the Third World. 

As Macpherson put it, “democracy is not properly to be equated with our unique Western liberal-democracy.” Instead, “the clearly non-liberal systems which prevail in the Soviet countries, and the somewhat different non-liberal systems of most of the underdeveloped countries of Asia and Africa, have a genuine historical claim to the title democracy.”

Macpherson explained the meaning of democracy has undergone some change over time. It hasn’t always referred to the kind of constitutional system common in the Western countries: “Democracy originally meant rule by the common people, the plebeians. It was very much a class affair: it meant the sway of the lowest and largest class.” Thus, Macpherson argued Soviet Communism and other one-party states can legitimately be called democracies, based on this definition. That is, he used this conception of “democracy” to describe some of the world’s most brutal and repressive regimes. 

Karl Marx’s proposed “dictatorship of the proletariat” was an expression of genuine democracy in Macpherson’s view. He noted many people would find it outrageous to consider the dictatorship of the proletariat to be a form of democracy. “But,” he wrote, “to call it democracy was not outrageous at all: it was simply to use the word in its original and then normal sense.”

Macpherson’s analysis gets even worse. Lenin extended Marx’s theory by arguing a revolution would need to be undertaken by a relatively small group of class-conscious people he called the vanguard, which is to say, the Communist Party. 

From the Communist perspective, since the vast majority of people in any society are debased by the structures of capitalism, they cannot be trusted to participate in political decision-making. To allow their participation would just perpetuate the problems of the old, capitalist society. Only the vanguard could bring about the necessary reforms. As Macpherson explains: “Lenin, building on Marx, came out for a seizure of power by a vanguard who would forcibly transform the basic relations of society in such a way that the people would become undebased and capable of a fully human existence, at which point compulsive government would no longer be needed.” 

In Macpherson’s view, this rule of the vanguard to “forcibly transform” society is democracy in action, despite the fact that it involves politically motivated executions and concentration camps. Democracy, it seems, becomes indistinguishable from dictatorship.

Macpherson evokes what he calls the “broader concept of democracy” to legitimize the Marxist-Leninist state: “Wherever the circumstances are such that no motion towards this kind of society is possible except through the action of a vanguard, then the vanguard state, so long as it remains true to its purpose, may be called democratic.” Thus, in his view, an outright communist state can be legitimately called a democracy. Many of the most brutal, bloodthirsty, and repressive regimes in the 20th Century were democracies in this sense. Who knew?

Using a similar line of argumentation, the one-party dictatorships of the Third World can also be justified as democracies. Invoking Rousseau, Macpherson wrote one-party states can be legitimately called democracies because “there is in these countries a general will, which can express itself through, and probably only through, a single party.” As a result, “opposition to the dominant party appears to be, and sometimes actually is, destructive of the chances of nationhood. In such circumstances opposition appears as treason against the nation.” Thus, a one-party state, where opposition to the ruling party is punished as “treason,” can be a legitimate form of democracy. (Don’t tell Justin Trudeau.)

Macpherson was an internationally known and respected political scientist. The views he expressed were not the rantings of a black-clad activist running wild in the streets. Some elements of the intellectual Left truly believe that a Marxist-Leninist state (or any other Left-wing single-party state) is a genuine democracy. Despite the inescapably violent and murderous nature of communism, some Canadian leftists view it favourably. 

The lessons of the 20th Century have not been learned. Ideas that inspired inhuman tyranny – what C.B. Macpherson happily calls the “broader concept of democracy” – seem to be making a comeback.

Michael Wagner is a columnist for the Western Standard

Continue Reading

Recent Posts

Recent Comments


Petition: No Media Bailouts

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

170 signatures

No Media Bailouts

The fourth estate is critical to a functioning democracy in holding the government to account. An objective media can't maintain editorial integrity when it accepts money from a government we expect it to be critical of.

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

**your signature**

The Western Standard will never accept government bailout money. By becoming a Western Standard member, you are supporting government bailout-free and proudly western media that is on your side. With your support, we can give Westerners a voice that doesn\'t need taxpayers money.

Share this with your friends:


Copyright © Western Standard New Media Corp.