Connect with us

Opinion

MORGAN: Smith’s departure a sign of talk radio’s slow death

“Media is in undergoing a huge, evolutionary transition right now. The technocrat class is playing whack-a-mole as they try to de-platform conservative and libertarian voices while new platforms keep springing up.”

mm

Published

on

While working as an oilfield surveyor in the ’90s, talk radio was a must. Whether standing next to my tripod in a wheat field or trying to stay awake while driving across the endless plains of Kansas, the radio was always tuned to the local talk radio station. It kept me up to date on issues and let me hear from different sides.

Talk radio back then was gritty and informative. Here in Alberta, I would listen to Dave Rutherford in the morning, and Dave Taylor in the afternoon. One was conservative and one was liberal. I enjoyed both because they were entertaining and informative. They didn’t just have guests and callers – they took them on. They engaged, they questioned and they opined on everything. I didn’t always agree, but that didn’t matter. It was engaging and it made one think. Peter Warren on the weekends was legendary. Those days are gone.

The beginning of the end around here came when Dave Rutherford was fired for being critical of his own radio station over their poor coverage of the Alberta floods in 2013. One could tell that this was a final straw of sorts, as Rutherford had been increasingly chafing under increased efforts to control his show. As a veteran broadcaster, Dave simply wasn’t going to take it.

After Rutherford’s firing, the station floundered through a number of hosts and formats. Those all pretty much failed until Danielle Smith was hired and put into the prime daytime slot. Many conservative listeners were hesitant to embrace Smith after the unfortunate end of her time as Wildrose leader, but she won them over as she continued the talk radio style and tradition in much the same style as Dave Rutherford had. Like Rutherford though, the pressure from to control her content became too much.

I am only guessing here, but I think the beginning of the end for Smith came when she had former UCP candidate Caylan Ford on the show. Ford was immersed in a controversy due to a number of false allegations of racism which were released by a “progressive” NDP-front website with the intent of derailing the UCP campaign.

Smith gave Ford an entire segment to explain herself and the progressive cancel mob went wild. Demands were made for Smith’s firing. Sponsors were threatened, the station caved and even deleted the archived show. Even Mayor Nenshi and Rachel Notley got in on the dogpile. As a result, Danielle Smith was neutered as a host and the character assassination of Caylan Ford remained undefended until recently.

How humiliating it must have been as Smith to have been hung out to dry by the station for having done her job well. It was quite literally, the news of the day. It was a controversial issue and there were two sides. Smith quickly discovered the hard way that there is only one side when the risk of a cancel mob appears.

As a regular listener, I caught some serious undertones a few months ago when it was clear that Danielle Smith was upset about something. She talked around it, but made it pretty clear that she had been instructed not to talk about certain things COVID-19 related. She then put it to the callers in a small act of rebellion so that they could speak to the subject even if she couldn’t. I am just guessing here, but I suspect that this was when Smith decided that she had enough and gave notice.
\

Talk radio is a dying format. It is a victim of modern times and it will not be able to beat the many new mediums which catch our attention. Streaming services, podcasts, and satellite radio have eaten up so much listenership that radio stations are broke and vulnerable. That is why they now cower in terror at the prospect of a mob complaining to their precious few remaining sponsors. Unfortunately, this move to vanilla radio is only making the inevitable demise of the platform all that much sadder.

I listened today to an afternoon host talking with an expert on the issue of child marriages in Canada. It really is happening and it really is legal. It is a concerning issue worthy of talking about and asking questions. The host and the guest took no callers though and managed to chat about the issue for the entire segment without once touching upon a giant elephant in the room, which is the religious and cultural aspects of this issue. Religious and cultural fundamentalism is behind nearly every child marriage and to pretend that this is an issue among most Albertans or Canadians is willfully blind. If you are only going to talk about 75 percent of an issue for fear of offending somebody, you may as well not talk about it at all. The use and point of talk radio here is lost.

Talk radio will continue to dwindle until it is little more than a news reading and traffic service. They can’t afford to discuss issues any longer.

Media is in undergoing a huge, evolutionary transition right now. The technocrat class is playing whack-a-mole as they try to de-platform conservative and libertarian voices while new platforms keep springing up. I am optimistic that balance and new forms of political discourse will emerge, but we are in for some tumultuous times as we find that balance.

Dave Rutherford has retired while Danielle Smith is already seeking new platforms to work from. I am looking forward to the new age of unfettered political discourse when it gets here. It can’t remain bottled up forever.

The heyday of talk radio is gone though. There are a few good, gritty voices still working the airwaves out there but they are fading. It’s the sad end of an era.

Cory Morgan is the Podcast Editor and a columnist for the Western Standard

Continue Reading
9 Comments

9 Comments

  1. That's Dr. #SAND to you...

    January 16, 2021 at 10:46 am

    Go to Amazon and buy a bunch cameras hidden in spy stuff, pens, USB chargers, clocks, anything.
    Then record the fascists.

  2. ninetyninepct

    January 16, 2021 at 9:54 am

    The fascist Liberal / NDP leftists hate free speech and now Trudeau wants to regulate us so we won’t be offended an so we are fed their Liberal approved garbage.

  3. Mars Hill

    January 13, 2021 at 11:38 pm

    The ccp will get chased out of America within a month, it’ll spill over to Canada and once JT is gone (jailed I hope) we’ll have a golden age of free speech, liberty and prosperity.

    • ninetyninepct

      January 16, 2021 at 10:10 am

      That and small Government is the WEXIT / Maverick policy.

  4. Ron Voss

    January 12, 2021 at 5:14 pm

    Talk radio is a dying format. And the cowardly stations are responsible for their own demise.

  5. Charles Martell III

    January 12, 2021 at 11:35 am

    Canada’s Broadcast Standard Council are a den of vipers . . .
    I remember when they were attacking Sun News Channel over a decade ago.

    Canada’s Corporatist Govt Funded media are far-left and the last thing they want is a debate.

    Whether it be the Klimate File, the Fraud US Election, the Failing Schools/Universities in Canada or our inept, corrupt Crime Minister & his Cabal of fools. Last thing they want are real questions and being held to account.

  6. Dianne Brodrick

    January 12, 2021 at 12:23 am

    Are they also run by the union UNIFOR like CBC, CTV and Global all Liberal?

    • ninetyninepct

      January 16, 2021 at 9:55 am

      UNIFOR’s Dias is a very dangerous individual. He can shut down this entire country with one phone call. He is a radical Trudeau / NDP supporter and openly hates Conservatives, exactly like Singh.

  7. Guest

    January 11, 2021 at 10:39 pm

    Ya, like holy cow eh? 11 Jan 2020
    I listened to her show today and she made mention of the Broadcast Standard Council a couple of times during her show. This is really sad that the Cancel Culture cry babies who want everything one sided run to the regulatory establishment for enforced censorship of Conservative voices on radio.

    I started listening to talk radio back in the 1980’s and it was a free for all debate on air. Good and bad. However, today talk radio is dull and boring on the CBC good God it would put me to sleep and it has.

    One thing we know is that Mrs. Smith won’t be quieted by the radical left cancel culture.

    It’s no wonder the owners of these media companies are begging for Trudeau to fund them and he is. That’s not a free press nor is it a free society when the radical left can cancel culture the people they don’t agree with.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

GEROW: Canada’s Libertarian leader bids adieu after fighting the good fight

“The liberty movement, the country, and myself personally, owe a debt of gratitude to Mr. Moen for his principled, steadfast stand to make Canada a freer place to live and do business.”

mm

Published

on

“I want gay married couples to be able to protect their marijuana plants with guns.” 

When Tim Moen was the newly elected leader of the Libertarian Party of Canada, his viral meme with this unforgettable passage garnered attention across Canada, and even overseas. 

His philosophy is a simple one of non-aggression and peaceful, voluntary cooperation. It can be boiled down even further to, “Don’t hurt people and don’t take their stuff.” Unfortunately, too many Canadians don’t appreciate that sentiment. Since its founding in 1972, the LPoC has never won a seat in parliament, or even come close. 

Moen is an anarcho-capitalist and draws influence from the great liberal enlightenment thinkers from John Locke, through to the Austrians – Mises and Rothbard – and appreciates the work of present-day intellectuals like Jordan Peterson. He thinks winning elections will happen when there’s more people who share his philosophy, hence the LPoC’s focus on ideas for the time being, over electoral success. His strategy has been to inspire people, and he has succeeded in doing that; at least for myself.

He took over as leader of the Libertarian Party in 2014, has ran in several elections. He’s not a career politician and it shows. He’s genuine, caring, and real.

His influence has reached outside of Canada as well. He was the opening speaker at the American Libertarian National convention – to record breaking attendance – and he’s shared a stage in Acapulco with libertarian heavyweights like Ron Paul. For LPoC faithful it has been difficult to reconcile his popularity abroad with the lack of traction here at home. That hasn’t stopped him from showing up every day with his work boots on for liberty movement.

Despite the lack of electoral success, there have been victories. The LPoC had advocated for cannabis legalization since the party’s inception. Likewise for same-sex marriage. Both are now the law and are broadly supported by the major parties. 

Advocating for liberty in Canada is not easy. People have confused cumbersome bureaucracies – like the health care system and rent-seeking corporations like Air Canada and the railways – into a disastrous national identity crisis. Thanks to those types of institutions and the political class that have enabled them, the strong and free country that built them and incorporated them into the national fabric no longer exists. Tim Moen tried to explain this to people and was met with disdain, repudiation, and insults, even from some fellow travellers on the libertarian journey. 

Moen rolled the dice in supporting the candidacy of Maxime Bernier for the leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada. He saw it as a rare chance for a libertarian to mount a real challenge for Canada’s top office, and it nearly panned out. 

In 2018, after years of friendship and collaboration, the two had a falling out over Bernier’s creation of the PPC. It appeared at the time the party might be finished. It would have been easy for him to walk away. Instead he muscled through the storms and kept the ship on course until he found a safe place to land it.

Moen will not be seeking re-election as party leader. It is a blow to a very important voice on Canada’s political stage. He’s not walking away from movement, and he says he will retain his membership with the LPoC. The small party will now have to elect his replacement. 

The liberty movement, the country, and myself personally, owe a debt of gratitude to Mr. Moen for his principled, steadfast stand to make Canada a freer place to live and do business. Most Canadians may still not know him, but they owe him as well. 

Darcy Gerow is a columnist for the Western Standard 

Continue Reading

Opinion

SELICK: Skelly trial will demolish Ford’s justifications for lockdowns

“Will the judge have the courage to accept evidence that flies in the face of all the propaganda we’ve been fed for the past year and a half?”

mm

Published

on

Remember Adam Skelly?  He’s the owner of Adamson Barbecue, the Ontario restaurant that refused to close down indoor dining when Ontario issued yet another lockdown order in November 2020. You may recall the videos of police arriving several days in a row to shut the place down, as Skelly continued to defy the order and enthusiastic patrons swarmed in to support him. Ultimately, Skelly was charged with six different offences, some provincial and some federal.

On June 28 and 29, his numerous charges will be heard in court. An expertly run crowdfunding campaign has garnered more than $338,000 to be used towards his legal fees and related expenses. He plans to make good use of it. 

Skelly is challenging the constitutionality of the legislation that gave rise to the charges. In my view, the lockdown and stay-at-home orders violate several provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: freedom of expression, freedom of peaceful assembly, freedom of association, and the right to life, liberty and security of the person – to name a few. 

But the Charter also contains what I call the “weasel clause,” section 1, which gives governments the right to trample all over individuals’ rights and freedoms provided it can later convince a court the trampling was “demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.” 

This is where the big fight will occur. The Ontario government’s position is lockdowns have been necessary for public health purposes. Skelly’s legal team and expert witnesses are eager to demolish that argument. 

Ontario’s evidence is contained within a single 14-page affidavit, sworn by Dr. Matthew Hodge, a member of the province’s public health team. It contains the usual talking points that Premier (Doug) Ford and his minions have made throughout the pandemic, referring to guidance from the World Health Organization, and relying on 19 exhibits, including an article from The Toronto Star. If you want to finally find out what the premier has been relying on when he chose to destroy Ontario’s economy and bankrupt many of its citizens, these exhibits are the place to look. 

By contrast, the evidence on behalf of Skelly is contained in 10 affidavits from five expert witnesses (each witness provided an initial affidavit and a rebuttal to Dr. Hodge). The witnesses’ credentials and the subjects they have testified on are summarized in a video posted to Rumble. The evidence covers a broad range of issues, challenging each and every assumption made by provincial authorities in their decision-making process. 

For instance, the province advances uncritically the proposition that there had been 499,412 “cases” of COVID-19 at the time Dr. Hodge swore his affidavit on May 14, 2021. However, the evidence of Dr. Byram Bridle in his 48-page affidavit contains a detailed discussion of the flaws in the PCR tests that the government used to establish its case count. Anyone who has been reading alternative media throughout the pandemic is already well aware that the PCR tests were never designed to be used as diagnostic tools, and that they are being operated at cycle thresholds which even the famous Dr. Fauci has admitted will return large numbers of false positives. Dr. Bridle drives this point home with numerous cross-references to scientific studies. He concludes: “PCR testing…in the context of high Ct values (i.e. greater than 22-30 cycles), is an inaccurate way to diagnose cases of COVID-19. A substantial, but unknown number of cases of COVID-19 that have been reported in Ontario…were never true cases of disease.” 

In other words, the government based its actions upon false beliefs. Garbage in, garbage out. 

One of the constant criticisms made of Ontario’s lockdown policy by individuals such as MPP Roman Baber (who got thrown out of the Conservative caucus for his pains) is lockdowns have done – and continue to do – more harm than good. Bankruptcies, suicides, cancer deaths, crime and family violence have all risen dramatically since the start of 2020 and are now causing more death and suffering than the virus.

This is corroborated by the evidence Dr. Douglas Allen, an economics professor at Simon Fraser University. Professor Allen examined over 80 studies to perform a thorough cost/benefit analysis of Ontario’s policies, something the government apparently never bothered to do. Stated in terms of life-years lost, and using a range of assumptions, he calculates that the lockdowns cost the population somewhere between 3.6 years of life and 282 years of life for every year of life they saved. 

There are many more goodies in store for those who watch the hearing, including a discussion of ivermectin, an effective and inexpensive COVID treatment governments across Canada have steadfastly ignored. The existence of this safe, effective treatment completely undermines the government’s case that lockdowns were justified. 

Will the judge have the courage to accept evidence that flies in the face of all the propaganda we’ve been fed for the past year and-a-half? We’ll know soon.

Karen Selick is a Columnist for the Western Standard. She is the former Litigation Lawyer of the Canadian Constitution Foundation and is the owner of KeenEyesEditing.ca.

Continue Reading

Opinion

WAGNER: By delegitimizing Canada, the woke-left helps the cause of Alberta independence

“By undermining citizens’ attachment to their country, the leftists are helping to clear the pathway for an independent Alberta. If Canada is such a horrible place, then there’s all the more reason for Alberta to leave.”

mm

Published

on

It’s somewhat disconcerting to see the way Canada is being portrayed by the left in 2021. Statues of major historical figures are being vandalized and torn down while the country is widely condemned in the media for “systemic” racism and discrimination. Canada, it turns out, is not the wonderful country we were led to believe it was. 

When I went to government schools decades ago, Canada was considered to be a welcoming and tolerant place. According to the new cultural leading lights, though, I was sadly misled by the government’s school teachers.

Jonathan Kay’s recent column in the National Post provides an excellent description of the new wave of anti-patriotism.

“Once imagined by the left as a light unto nations, Canada is now trashed in newspaper columns and the social media feeds of blue-check Can-con culturati as an incurably bigoted colonialist artifice. At the Toronto Star, one author recently instructed us to avoid singing the national anthem on Canada Day, and instead spend the day reflecting gloomily ‘on the many lives that the building of the Canadian state has cost.’ Another Star writer described Canada’s creation as coterminous with ‘intentional genocide,’ as if we were, and remain, a snowy version of the Belgian Congo.”

This, of course, is a very distorted view of Canada based on extreme “intersectional” ideology. Canada is being misconstrued in order to lay the groundwork for political change. It is historical revisionism of the worst kind. When the country is situated within a proper historical context – and in relation to the other countries of the world – it doesn’t look all that bad. But defending Canada in the current atmosphere could get one cancelled.

Alberta sovereigntists, however, might consider sitting back and letting the woke-left rip apart the moral fabric of the state that now appears to have become a mutual enemy. How can people who see Canada as an inherently sinister regime defend it against those who wish to seek independence from it? How can the Canadian state be an indivisible, sacrosanct light unto the nations and simultaneously be an evil, genocidal blight on human progress that must atone for original sin? It can’t. 

Anyone who really believes Canada to be little better than a crypto-fascist imperial state will be unable to mount a credible defence of its existence. In fact, if Canada is as bad as progressives claim it is, then they should celebrate its break up.

Years ago, Dr. Roger Gibbins of the Canada West Foundation recognized the argument for Alberta remaining in Canada was fundamentally based on emotional attachment to Canada. As the Globe and Mail put it in 2003, Gibbins described the case for Alberta to remain part of confederation as, “An affair of the heart, not of the head.” That’s because there are no credible economic arguments in favour of Alberta remaining in Canada. It was only love for Canada that kept the province in. But how can anyone love a country as horrible as the progressives say Canada is?

The economic arguments for Alberta to remain in Canada became obsolete generations ago. The remaining cornerstone of emotional attachment to Canada is rapidly being undermined by the country’s intellectual and media elites. Judging by the kinds of statements they’re making, these elites hate their own country, so they shouldn’t mind when Alberta leaves.

There might be a temptation to defend Canada because the extreme denunciations cast upon it are so obviously over-the-top. Instead, however, sovereigntists may just sit back and let it play out. The progressives are plowing the ground so that the seeds of independence can more easily take root as commitment to Canada is undermined.

In effect, the leftists are handing Alberta secessionists a stick with which to beat the federalists. Secessionists can now ask federalists – in tones of feigned moral indignation – “How can you defend an incurably bigoted country like Canada?” 

The attacks upon Canada as a systemically racist and all-round illegitimate state are sad. Hundreds of thousands of people from across the world pour into Canada every year – and millions more want to. Clearly, most of the world judges Canada to be a much better place than our homegrown leftists do. 

Be that as it may, by undermining citizens’ attachment to their country, the leftists are helping to clear the pathway for an independent Alberta. If Canada is such a horrible place, then there’s all the more reason for Alberta to leave.

Michael Wagner is a Senior Columnist for the Western Standard

Continue Reading

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Share

Petition: No Media Bailouts

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

57 signatures

No Media Bailouts

The fourth estate is critical to a functioning democracy in holding the government to account. An objective media can't maintain editorial integrity when it accepts money from a government we expect it to be critical of.

We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.

**your signature**



The Western Standard will never accept government bailout money. By becoming a Western Standard member, you are supporting government bailout-free and proudly western media that is on your side. With your support, we can give Westerners a voice that doesn\'t need taxpayers money.

Share this with your friends:

Trending

Copyright © Western Standard New Media Corp.