Saskatchewan NDP candidate Meara Conway is being blasted for comments she made slamming Alberta’s oil sands.
In a now-deleted April 2018 Facebook post, the Regina Elphinstone-Centre candidate wrote the Alberta “tar sands are a f—ing nightmare.”
She added “any political agenda that takes climate change seriously doesn’t have space for the (TMX) expansion.”
The ruling Saskatchewan Party was quick to jump on the comments.
The party tweeted Conway’s statement asking whether NDP Leader Ryan Meili supports “the views of such an extreme anti-oil sector candidate.”
Meili on Monday distanced himself from the Conway comments.
“Our position is clear, and all of our candidates agree to our party policy,” said Meili in Regina.
“That’s part of becoming a candidate, and our party policy is clear: We support the energy industry, and we want to see the men and women of that industry back on the job.”
Meili has said he supports the expansion of the TMX pipeline.
He said it could be time to have “a discussion” about how far back the parties should be digging into social media.
“Certainly the further back you go, the more murky it gets,” said Meili.
In a statement, Conway accused the Saskatchewan Party of trying to distract from their record.
“Ryan has been clear that oil and gas are a big part of our economy and will be for the future,” said Conway.
“I’m proud of the balanced approached he and the Saskatchewan NDP have articulated, which includes investments into renewable energy that would create sustainable, well-paying jobs for energy sector workers.”
Meanwhile, a Saskatchewan Party candidate has apologized for taking part in a game that encouraged women to bare their breasts.
In a 2016 article published in the Regina Leader-Post, Alex Nau, a candidate in Regina Rosemont detailed a “wheel of fun” game at Country Thunder, then known as the Craven Country Jamboree.
“Depending on where the dial stops, the wheel of fun means you have to funnel a beer, show your breasts or have beer shot down your throat via a water gun,” reported the Leader-Post about the game.
On Sunday, as first reported by the Saskatoon StarPhoenix, Nau apologized.
“A number of years ago while at Craven with friends, I was involved in an interview that referenced a “wheel of fun” that included a disrespectful action,” he said in the statement.
“I understand how suggesting this action is disrespectful to women and regret my participation.”
The statement concludes: “It was wrong. I would not do this again.”
In a statement the Saskatchewan Party said they will not be removing Nau as a candidate.
“This behaviour was clearly juvenile, inappropriate and disrespectful and is not condoned by the Saskatchewan Party. Mr. Nau did disclose this and communicated his regret and understanding of how his behaviour was disrespectful.
“Many have made mistakes at a younger age. The Saskatchewan Party takes the position that if one has learned from their mistakes and corrected their behavior, it should not disqualify you from running for office. Accordingly, Mr. Nau will remain a candidate.”
When the legislature was dissolved, the Saskatchewan Party held a 46-13 lead over the NDP.
Residents go to the polls Oct. 26.
BAROOTES: There’s nothing ‘just’ about Justin’s ‘Just Transition’
Erika Barootes says Albertans need a voice in the Senate to fight the phasing-out of the energy sector.
Erika Barootes is a Senate nominee candidate for the Conservative Party of Canada
A key reason I put my name forward to represent Alberta in the Senate is to speak up for the many Albertans whose lives and livelihoods are being fundamentally ignored by Ottawa.
The Liberal government’s so-called “Just Transition” scheme is only the most recent example. In its crosshairs are the 522,000 Canadians working in the oil and gas industry and the families that depend on them.
You easily could have missed it: right before the Liberals pulled the plug and called their opportunistic election in August, they launched consultations for “just transition” legislation. That consultation has already closed, with no further opportunities for feedback to be welcomed by the government.
No matter how it’s branded, the “transition” here involves putting resource workers out of work, with their livelihoods deemed a write-off.
The “Just Transition” plan, a scheme to mothball a key economic driver in our country, started long before the creation of Trudeau’s buzz term with the stopping of resource projects. Whether it was the prime minister’s killing Northern Gateway by cabinet order or the regulatory strangulation of the Frontier oil sands project, amongst others, the government knows the jobs it doesn’t want Canadians supporting their families with.
The glaring omission in the idealistic “just transition” are the lives of those it impacts immediately. Much like the consumer carbon tax forced on provinces by Ottawa, the considerations for ordinary people weren’t taken into account: the carbon tax didn’t stop people from driving to work, or their kids to extra-curricular activities, or paying to heat their homes — it just made it more expensive.
Leadership – especially amongst Alberta companies – in reducing GHG emissions per barrel, or ongoing innovation in the oil and gas industry, global demand for resources, and the uncomfortable question of “then who are we going to import our resources from?” don’t seem to resonate at all with Ottawa.
While the legislation hasn’t been introduced, nor has the report from the “consultations” even been finished, I’m not optimistic about where the NDP-backed Liberal minority government in Ottawa will land on this.
This is exactly why the Senate, the upper house, needs legitimate representation from our country’s regions. That was supposed to be the point of the Senate, a counterbalance and gut-check on the House of Commons.
Another handpicked-by-Ottawa appointee to speak for Albertans only exacerbates the problem.
I know what you’re thinking: you think this government is going to appoint the person Albertans choose? What’s the point?
Hundreds of thousands of ballots were cast in Alberta’s Senate nominee elections in 1998 and 2004 during the previous period of federal Liberal governance. In 1998, there wasn’t even the hope of a merged federal Conservative Party on the horizon.
This election, and Alberta’s proud history of leadership on Senate reform, gives Albertans an opportunity to make their voices heard.
The Liberals and NDP who mock and boycott these elections love the appointment process and an effective rubber stamp on whatever comes out of the House of Commons. No checks, no balances.
With next-to-no consultation on consequential legislation like the upcoming “just transition” scheme coming out of Ottawa, it’s clear why we need real representation in the Senate to put checks and balances on the House of Commons.
People’s livelihoods are too important to be lost in the process.
Erika Barootes is a Senate nominee candidate for the Conservative Party of Canada
WITTEVRONGEL: The oil and gas industry is helping rein in Alberta’s deficit. Can it also help lower GHGs?
“If we want to have a chance of hitting this ambitious target, we need to shift the narrative from blaming the oil and gas industry to embracing it as an integral part of the solution.”
Alberta’s expected deficit will be less than half what was projected in February, largely thanks to the rebound of the oil and gas industry. Expanded oilsands production, improved oil prices, and increased oil and gas investment have resulted in higher than anticipated resource revenues. In fact, the province’s revised royalty estimates are now triple the original sums.
While the oil and gas industry steps in and once again saves Alberta, the forecasted resource revenue is being called too high to be sustainable. In addition, the serendipitous rebound occurs as we emerge from Canada’s “infernal summer,” with many calling for decisive action on climate change.
Given the federal government’s pledge to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, we must consider how and where the oil and gas industry fits into that. While some are more than happy to see the entire sector go up in flames, others have a more nuanced vision of the future. With its technology, resources, and infrastructure, the industry is actually uniquely situated to not only play its part in a low-emission future, but to lead.
While the Canadian oil and gas sector contributes only about 0.3% of overall global GHG emissions, and work is well underway to develop more renewable energy sources for consumption, there are other high-emitting industries like steel and cement that lack viable options for reducing emissions. Therefore, without some form of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), net-zero seems unrealistic.
CCUS involves capturing carbon dioxide and, if not used on site, often transporting it (by pipeline) to be used elsewhere or injected into geological formations for permanent storage so it does not re-enter the atmosphere. The oil and gas industry, with its expertise, pipelines, and other infrastructure, is best positioned to lead in this area. In fact, the same formations we extract oil and gas out of can store CO2, deep in the ground.
In recent years, some of the world’s largest and most advanced carbon capture projects have been developed in Alberta. With a promised federal investment tax credit for CCUS slotted to take effect in 2022, this is an opportune time to expand and grow CCUS potential.
In addition, the much-vilified Alberta oilsands are in close proximity to Canada’s Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, offering a world-class opportunity for permanent carbon storage.
CCUS fits into the broader circular economy model for mitigating emissions. The four Rs of the circular carbon economy—reduce, reuse, recycle, and remove—were endorsed at the G20 Energy Ministers meeting in 2020 as being “a holistic, integrated, inclusive, and pragmatic approach to managing emissions.” As such, CCUS has a part to play in a resilient, sustainable system.
Reducing net GHG emissions to zero by 2050 is going to be a challenge. If we want to have a chance of hitting this ambitious target, we need to shift the narrative from blaming the oil and gas industry to embracing it as an integral part of the solution.
Guest Column by Krystle Wittevrongel, Public Policy Analyst at the Montreal Economic Institute www.iedm.org
Deal sees Alberta becoming half owner of the Sturgeon Refinery
North West Refining will be paid $425 million to forego future tolling revenue and for its 50% equity stake. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., which owns the other 50% of the refinery, will also be paid $400 million.
The Alberta government now owns 50% of the troubled Sturgeon Refinery.
Energy Minister Sonya Savage said yesterday the move should free up $2 billion for provincial coffers.
“We are taking action to get a better deal for taxpayers and reducing long-term costs. This agreement provides more economic certainty which will benefit Albertans today and into the future. We look forward to our renewed arrangement with the refinery’s operator, the North West Redwater Partnership, in the years to come,” Savage said in a release.
Under the deal, the government is transferred a 50% ownership interest in the refinery previously held by North West Refining.
The government made the switch after reviewing contracts the Sturgeon Refinery signed with former premier Ed Stelmach’s government in 2011.
The Alberta director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, Kevin Lacey, wasn’t happy with the deal.
“The government is just trying to dig themselves out of bad contracts they signed in the past. We expect our government to run schools, hospitals and keep our taxes low, they should not be involved in the energy business,” Lacey told the Western Standard.
“Alberta needs our government to support our energy sector, yes, but it should not be directly involved in the industry. Let the politicians run the government and business people run businesses.”
With the deal, North West Refining will be paid $425 million to forego future tolling revenue and for its 50% equity stake. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., which owns the other 50% of the refinery, will also be paid $400 million.
“This process will not cost taxpayers any additional funds than the government would otherwise be obligated to pay as a toll payer,” said a government release.
“Through the agreement, the government is able to capture the value of processing bitumen as both a toll payer and facility owner.
“This plan improves the government’s net present value for the refinery by approximately $2 billion over the life of the project. Net present value is the difference between the present value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows over a period of time.”
The government said the agreement also frees up $1 billion in cash flow over the next five years because additional cash flow is a result of the restructuring.
The agreement includes a 10-year extension of the processing agreement to 2058.
“With this optimization, the government has an equal vote in the control of the refinery to which it is the majority toll payer. Canadian Natural will provide operational leadership to North West Redwater Partnership,” said the government.
The Sturgeon Refinery is designed to process approximately 79,000 barrels per day of diluted bitumen from Alberta’s oil sands into higher-value products like low-carbon, low-sulphur diesel, vacuum gas oil, diluent and natural gas liquids.
It was set to originally cost $5.4 billion but was completed last year at a cost of close to $11 billion.
Uncensored: Mandatory Vaccination
Chu wants meeting with Gondek ‘to tell the truth’
WATCH: Vancouver restaurant served closure order for non-compliance with ‘Public Health Act’
Dr. Bonnie Henry ordered to stand trial
The Western Standard Is Back
BC doc says he’s found blood clots in 62% of post-jab patients
- Uncensored: Mandatory Vaccination on
- MORGAN: Albertans need real recall legislation now on
- Chu wants meeting with Gondek ‘to tell the truth’ on
- Whistlestop’s Scott launches new anti-COVID lockdown advocacy group on
- NAVARRO-GENIE: Trust is the foundation of authority — and governments are losing both on
Petition: No Media Bailouts
We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.
News3 days ago
EXCLUSIVE: Chu vows not to resign, apologizes and speaks out on allegations
Opinion2 days ago
SELICK: If the gov’t wants to kick the unvaccinated off healthcare, then give us back our taxes & let us pay for our own
News2 days ago
Whistlestop’s Scott launches new anti-COVID lockdown advocacy group
News3 days ago
WS Exclusive POLL: Support for Alberta independence hits new high
News2 days ago
Wall says Calgary oil firms should seek greener pastures
Opinion3 days ago
SLOBODIAN: Manitoba cabinet ministers are maskless belles of the ball as pastor arrested
Opinion3 days ago
FILDEBRANDT: The unions bought city hall
News20 hours ago
Trudeau announces national vaccine passport system