In the October election, Andrew Scheer did what every conservative does when they get into trouble on social issues: pretend to be a libertarian. Wounded culture warriors on the right routinely take refuge in this kinder, gentler brand when under siege by the progressive left. But authenticity matters, and voters aren’t buying it.
When pressed on his opposition to same-sex marriage and abortion in a post-election interview, Scheer argued: “…you can have a personal view and you can acknowledge that, in Canada, the prime minister does not impose a particular viewpoint on Canadians.”
I like it.
It’s a perfectly reasonable position that reflects an understanding that 1) the state must be limited in both size and scope so that no citizen is subject to the capricious personal preferences of the political class, and that 2) culture should be allowed to develop organically in the private sphere. When market forces are allowed to work in the cultural arena, the best and most adaptive values and traditions are adopted, and the worst and least adaptive values and traditions fall away. Engineering a culture – like engineering an economy – doesn’t work and allows the government to pick winners and losers. That’s the theory anyway.
“I believe that Canadians understand that any number of people can have a different point of view on these issues. What’s important to them is to know whether a prime minister will make changes or seek to make changes,” Scheer said. “And my assurances to Canadians was that as prime minister, these types of debates would not be reopened.”
Again, sounds good.
Scheer is outlining what is essentially a culturally conservative and politically libertarian fusionist worldview. It’s a view held by many libertarians who, in their personal lives, adhere to traditional conservative values and believe that a free society is the best protection against infringements on the exercise of these values. There is also a school of thought in libertarianism that posits that traditional conservative values would grow in popularity with the declining influence of the state in both social and economic affairs. The paradox of this view is that libertarians would resist any attempt by government to criminalize behaviours – prostitution and drug use, for example – they themselves might agree are socially destructive. Andrew Scheer is not one of these people.
Despite his desperate assurances during the election that he has no interest in pursuing a socially conservative political agenda, voters didn’t trust him, and had no reason to.
The only major social reform coming out of the federal government since same-sex marriage in 2005 has been marijuana policy reform, an initiative intended to reduce the harm associated with the illicit marijuana drug trade and to end the unjust criminalization of its users. While it’s clear now that Trudeau’s legalization scheme has pleased neither the marijuana activists – who have demanded reforms for decades – nor the licensed commercial cannabis growers drowning in red tape, marijuana legalization was a good idea badly executed.
You can believe both that marijuana is a social problem and that prohibition makes that problem worse within the logical confines of a culturally conservative/politically libertarian worldview. But Scheer doesn’t hold this view. Scheer is personally opposed to marijuana use and did not hesitate to attempt to “impose a particular viewpoint” on the rest of Canadians, even if that meant putting peaceful marijuana users in jail. He failed to separate his personal views from his political views and hoped nobody would remember when he provided assurances of his live-and-let-live approach to social policy.
Since the Conservative leadership race, Scheer has led a campaign against marijuana policy reform. It started with a fundraising email sent to party supporters during the 2017 leadership contest in which Scheer warned of the Liberal “hidden agenda when it comes to illegal drugs: decriminalize them all.” And during debates on marijuana policy reform in parliament under his leadership, the Tories adopted a 1950s “Reefer Madness” hysteria to compliment their avalanche of bad social and economic arguments against drug policy reform.
Only after tremendous backlash to his hinting that a government under his leadership would re-criminalize marijuana did the drug war rhetoric ease up. Not because Scheer thought his critics were right, but because he thought it politically expedient not to say anything that might destabilize a growing commercial cannabis industry.
The Angus Reid Institute noted that “the vast majority of Canadians support legalizing marijuana, though they’re divided on whether using the drug is “acceptable.” In other words, the vast majority of Canadians are able to separate their personal views on marijuana from their political views. But not Scheer.
Seeking cover under the libertarian brand didn’t work for Scheer because he had already let voters know he was no friend of social freedoms. The move lacked both credibility and authenticity – and smacked of desperation. Had Scheer ignored the manufactured media outrage over his social views and defended an authentic conservatism, he may very well have done better. At the very least, he would have been carried off the field of battle on his shield as a hero to grassroots conservatives. Instead, social conservatives now think he’s weak and progressive conservatives think he’s a liability.
In the final analysis of the election loss, many Conservative partisans are insisting that it is no longer possible to elect someone who doesn’t march in Pride events or disavow his or her Christian views. This is bigoted nonsense. Scheer’s promise to keep his personal views separate from his political views was the right strategy. The problem was that voters who may be been persuaded by this argument remembered the Reefer Madness rhetoric and had no reason to trust him.
Matthew Johnston is the Opinion Editor of the Western Standard. firstname.lastname@example.org
SLOBODIAN: Singh’s big, comfy rocker shows his true stripes
“Pure democratic socialism doesn’t exist. Never has. Never will. It’s a myth like unicorns, government transparency, keeping campaign promises, and equality for everyone.”
The federal NDP says it is committed to democratic socialism that will deliver Utopia for me and thee.
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh breathlessly preaches equality for all when it comes to wealth, income, and the distribution of limitless goodies.
So, going by this equal distribution doctrine Singh embraces, we can all expect to get a free $1,895 rocking chair. Right?
One just like the Grand Jackson Rocker Singh’s wife Gurkiran got from Monte Design, a Canadian furniture company that rewarded her for promoting the chair on her Instagram account in December.
Hold on. Isn’t that a violation of the Conflict of Interest Code for Members of the House of Commons? It states MPs or “any member of a member’s family” may not accept gifts that “might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence the member in the exercise of a duty or function of his or her office.”
Gifts valued under $200 are permitted with conditions. Anything of greater value must be reported to the office of Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion within 60 days with an explanation of the source of the gifts and why they’re given. If an MP is deemed to have violated the code, a sanction can be recommended to be levelled at the discretion of the House of Commons.
Don’t hold your breath.
But Gurkiran got the rocker. It’s not like hubby Singh planned to sit in it, promote it, or anything so brazen as that.
MPs surely attend Ethics Class 101 and are expected to be astute enough to know advertising a gift from a company would be a big dumb no-no.
Uh-oh. Singh published a photo Sunday on his Instagram page of him holding his infant daughter while parked in the comfy freebie chair. The name of the furniture company was tagged in the image.
Maybe Singh was so busy plotting how to dole out buckets of free stuff on the taxpayer dime, he skipped ethics class.
Anyway, it’s all good now — after Singh got outed.
“The NDP says it is working with the ethics commissioner and intends to file a formal disclosure report on a $1,895 rocking chair given to NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh’s wife in exchange for posting about the item on her Instagram account,” NDP spokesperson Mélanie Richer said in a statement to CBC.
“The chair was given to Gurkiran with an expectation that she would promote it on social media. There was no expectation that Jagmeet would post about it.”
That the code clearly mentions family members escaped the attention of the noble NDP. Details.
The Singhs have “realized their error and will be paying for the gift,” said Richer.
Saskatoon West Tory MP Brad Redekopp didn’t feel like overlooking the error.
“The average Canadian is worrying about how they are going to pay their bills, while Jagmeet Singh and the NDP worry about making online influencer deals to get expensive gifts,” he tweeted.
He also tweeted a picture of a laughing Singh and a chair asking: “Are you a NDP Champagne Socialist that can afford $1,900 rocking chairs?”
“Socialists make the best capitalists,” tweeted the Western Standard’s Cory Morgan, assistant opinion and broadcast editor and host of Triggered.
They do. With his expensive Rolex watches, custom made suits, and BMW, flashy Singh’s no exception.
Wealth isn’t a bad thing. The Bible’s full of scripture endorsing prosperity. Hypocrisy? Heavily frowned upon.
Socialists are masters of manipulating fear and greed of voters by making big promises that never materialize.
Some argue that in Singh’s case, it’s only a chair. Perhaps.
But socialism is a slippery slope. Where does it end? A rocking chair one day, a dacha the next?
Socialism is communism with lipstick that leads to a two-tiered society — the elite and the wanting, duped poor.
In Russia, the elite peddle communism whilst munching on black caviar in well-furnished seasonal dachas.
Meanwhile, the masses head to the markets hoping the potatoes in the bins won’t be too blackened from blight or mold.
How’s socialism working out for the suffering people in Argentina — once prosperous and plentiful like us?
Socialism attracts two kinds of supporters. Those too stupid to know it’s a curse. And those in power who bank on their stupidity by preaching its merits while cashing in on the fruits of capitalism.
Singh peddles hardcore socialism while wringing his hands over the increasing plight of the poor brought by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s destructive and crushing policies he unfailingly supports.
“Increasingly, we’re seeing two worlds in Canada,” he once said.
“The world for most Canadians is increasingly unaffordable, involves more precarious work, and is a harder place in which to get by. The second world is an exclusive club for the wealthy and well-connected who get special access and are exempt from rules the rest of us play by.”
About that rocker. Don’t start rearranging the furniture to make room for it.
Pure democratic socialism doesn’t exist. Never has. Never will. It’s a myth like unicorns, government transparency, keeping campaign promises, and equality for everyone.
Slobodian is the Senior Manitoba Columnist for the Western Standard
THOMAS: How Western Canada fared in the 2021 housing market
“That didn’t happen. By early summer, sales picked up, prices steadied and the industry hasn’t looked back since, with some markets setting sales records in 2021.”
When COVID-19 hit in March 2020, like many industries, the lockdowns and restrictions shut down housing industry operations.
Home sales and prices plummeted, adding to the fear of the virus that homeowners would lose their homes’ equity.
That didn’t happen. By early summer, sales picked up, prices steadied and the industry hasn’t looked back since, with some markets setting sales records in 2021.
Here’s how major markets in Western Canada fared last year.
It was the third year in a row with record-breaking sales and dollar volumes.
“Both 2020 and 2021 were remarkable years in delivering sales gains from the previous year,” said Kourosh Doustshenas, outgoing president of the Winnipeg Regional Real Estate Board. “Last year saw an increase of more than 2,500 sales compared to 2020 and 33% sales growth over the previous five-year average.”
Sales of existing homes in 2021 reached 18,575 units with the dollar sales volume reaching $6.25 billion, up 28% from 2020.
Single-family homes and condominiums were the most popular, with market shares of 68% and 14% respectively.
The Saskatchewan Realtors Association’s (SRA) report covers all sales in the province.
A record 17,387 sales were recorded in 2021, surpassing the previous record in 2007 by 17%.
While the pandemic triggered disruptions in some sectors of the economy, housing boomed, said SRA CEO, Chris Guérette.
“Improved savings from those not financially impacted by COVID-19, combined with low lending rates have supported the strong sales environment we saw throughout 2021,” said Guérette, adding inventory levels in the province were 16% below long-term trends.
“This resulted in the MLS Home Price Index (HPI) composite benchmark price* gaining more than seven percent.”
Sales of existing homes in Calgary soared in 2021, reaching a record 27,686, nearly 72% higher than 2020 and more than 44% higher than the 10-year average, says the Calgary Real Estate Board (CREB).
“Concerns over inflation and rising lending rates likely created more urgency with buyers over the past few months, said CREB’s chief economist Ann-Marie Lurie. “However, the supply has not kept pace with the demand, causing strong price growth.”
The year-end benchmark price was $451,567, up 8% from 2020.
“We enter 2022 with some of the tightest conditions in over a decade,” said Lurie. “In December, inventory was nearly 25% lower than long-term averages, which will impact our housing market in 2022.”
“2021 was an incredible year for the Greater Edmonton Area (GEA),” says Realtors Association of Edmonton chair Tom Shearer. “The year-over-year stats for sales and listings in the GEA were significantly higher than December 2020.”
Last December, single-family home sales rose 16.5% from December 2020. Condo sales increased 25.6% from December 2020. Duplex/rowhouse sales increased 16.8% year-over-year.
The HPI benchmark price in the GEA came in at $410,900, a 5.2% increase from December 2020.
Home sales reached an all-time high in 2021, with the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver (REBGV) reporting a total of 43,999, a 4% increase over the previous record of 42,326 in 2015.
The HPI composite benchmark price at the end of 2021 was $1,230,200, a 17.3% increase from December 2020.
“While steady, home listing activity didn’t keep pace with the record demand we saw throughout 2021. This imbalance caused residential home prices to rise over the past 12 months,” said Keith Stewart, REBGV economist.
“Detached home and townhome benchmark prices increased 22% last year, while apartments increased 12.8%.”
There were 10,052 properties sold in 2021, close to the record of 10,622 sales in 2016.
“The theme of this year has been very consistent,” says Victoria Real Estate Board president David Langlois. “Each month a high demand for homes paired with record low inventory has put strong pressure on pricing and attainability.”
The single-family HPI benchmark price in the Victoria Core in December 2021 was $1,144,900, up 25.1% from $1,122,600 in November. The HPI benchmark price for a condominium in the area in December 2020 was $570,600 up from $487,100 a year earlier.
Housing supply across the country is a concern, said Langlois
“We have spoken throughout the year about the need for new housing supply at all levels to help moderate prices and improve attainability,” he said. “Some of our municipalities have begun to look at ways to make it easier for new homes to be brought to market and we applaud and encourage any movement in this area.”
*The MLS® Home Price Index (HPI) is a measure of real estate prices that provides a clearer picture of market trends over traditional tools such as mean or median average prices. It is designed to be a reliable, consistent, and timely way of measuring changes in home prices over time.
Myke Thomas is a Western Standard contributor. He started in radio as a child voice actor, also working in television and as the real estate columnist, reporter and editor at the Calgary Sun for 22 years.
MAKICHUK: Flaming question: Should we let them go, or not?
“Maybe Gondek can take a holiday in Mexico? Pretty please?”
So, do we care if the Flames leave, or not?
That, my friends, is the question.
While it appears Mayor Jyoti Gondek was instrumental in letting the arena deal die, it’s never quite as simple as that.
I wouldn’t exactly put halos over the heads of the Flames owners either.
Someone suggested the right people to negotiate this thing are not in place — that actually sounds like it might have some merit.
It reminds me of when the Flames decided to trade Doug Gilmour, the player who helped them win the Stanley Cup.
At that time, sources told me the team and Gilmour were not that far apart in the money department. In fact, it was pocket change compared to what they pay players now.
I won’t go over the Gilmour-Leeman trade, it’s too painful for Flames fans to have to endure, and, well, I’m not that cruel of a person.
But really, are we that far apart now? We all know construction costs are soaring, but slamming the door shut on this deal, is not the way to go, IMO.
Even though I can’t stand the Flames. Why?
Well, for starters, I’m a Red Wings fan, all the way.
Secondly, when I worked at the Calgary Sun, whenever the Flames went into the playoffs we would end up working 12-hour days until the ordeal was over.
We did well against the competition, having a good stable of writers who worked their tails off. Not to mention the best sports photogs in the city.
As we got no extra overtime pay for all this extra effort and hardly saw our families during these times — which were exciting, of course, no argument there — it just got to be too much.
We would kill forests of trees to pound out pages on the Flames and their playoff adventures.
In the end, whenever the Flames were eliminated, we would hold the “Thank You Flames Open” — a golf tournament, complete with prizes, and, a Green Jacket, which we purchased at Goodwill for $8.
The winner would get to wear the green jacket in the office, for an entire year — a tremendous honour!
But I’m not here to beat up on the Flames. I know how important this team is to the city.
While personally I don’t care if they stay or go, I know a lot of people want them to stay because they have become such an important symbol of our city.
Some of the best hockey ever played was between the Flames and, those guys up north … what’s their name again? Oil something?
Anyway, you get the picture. We happen to have a big rivalry with the folks in Edmonton who seem to get things done better and faster than our city council.
Case in point, Rogers Place. How come they could get it done and we couldn’t?
That project also went over-budget, and led to a similar standoff. Clearly, cooler heads prevailed and Edmonton’s council approved the funding for the House of McDavid … and the rest, as they say, is history.
By the way, they also have better winter snow removal according to what I’ve been told.
So do we care or not? Should we try to resurrect this deal or not?
Should Gondek — she of the climate emergency no one cares about — swallow her pride and step aside from the negotiation process?
Or, well … should we let them go and build a brand new stadium for the Calgary Stampeders instead? Believe it or not, they actually do need a new stadium.
As much as I love McMahon stadium, it is seriously out of date. I mean, even Regina has a much better football stadium, for crissakes. Regina!
If you ask me, I’d rather axe the Green Line, and other such Nero-like mega-projects of the previous mayor and use that money elsewhere.
But let’s get back to the Flames. Remember Winnipeg, who went through a dark period after their NHL team left town?
Glen Murray was city councillor for Winnipeg’s Fort Rouge ward at the time and was elected as the city’s mayor in 1998. He watched as Winnipeg’s team slipped away, eventually moving to Phoenix, where hockey never really caught on.
“It was heartbreaking because the provincial and the municipal governments who were subsidizing [the team] couldn’t sustain it,” Murray told the CBC.
“Every proposal for a new arena involved hundreds of millions of dollars, which no one in the community could raise at the time,” he said. “It was a real dark period for the city because people love their hockey team.”
When the much-despised NHL commissioner Gary Bettman announced the return of the then still-to-be-named team in May 2011, the excitement in the city was palpable.
“In all my years as a reporter, I have never seen a city stop before,” said Marjorie Dowhos, a CBC Manitoba reporter.
“Cheers immediately broke out, some people had tears in their eyes and I had shivers up my spine as I watched all of this,” she said.
Season tickets went on sale to the general public on June 4 and sold out in 17 minutes.
What more do I have to say? Do we really want to go the way of the Winnipeg Jets?
Let me finish, with a little story.
Back in 1967, my Dad took me to my first NHL hockey game at the Olympia in Detroit. They were sold out, so we bought $3 standing room tickets.
The first thing I saw was Gordie Howe score effortlessly on Toronto Maple Leafs goalie Terry Sawchuk, on a breakaway. The place went nuts, it literally shook.
That, and many other experiences that evening, would change my life. I saw walls of Red Wings paraphernalia, none of which we could afford. I think all we came home with was a cheap program.
To this day, I will never forget that first experience of watching the Wings play and seeing them walk off the ice on a carpet, right in front of me.
Hockey gods they were — not like today’s overpaid prima donnas.
One can’t really put a dollar value on that. I don’t know how much the Flames bring to the city, financially, but I would imagine it’s significant. But then, there’s that emotional attachment, too.
Remember the big run in 2004? We all do. Hell, even I was popping shooters on 17 Avenue!
So yeah, hell, let’s try to keep the Flames. Let’s give it another go and hope that as good citizens the Flames owners group will cut us some slack in this time of financial disarray. And let’s get the right people in there, to get this done.
Maybe Gondek can take a holiday in Mexico? Pretty please?
And really, let’s leave this “line in the sand” crap to Vladimir Putin and his maniacal ambitions.
We’re better than that, I’m sure of it. Let’s get ‘er done.
Dave Makichuk is a Western Standard contributor.
He has worked in the media for decades, including as an editor for the Calgary Herald. He is also the Calgary correspondent for ChinaFactor.news
Alberta chiefs say ‘no’ to drug decriminalization amid opioid crisis
Kenney says Alberta may have reached Omicron peak
Saskatchewan unions beg for more COVID restrictions
Dr. Bonnie Henry ordered to stand trial
The Western Standard Is Back
Trudeau calls the unvaccinated racist and misogynistic extremists
- Kenney says Alberta may have reached Omicron peak on
- Danish newspaper apologizes for contributing to COVID hysteria on
- Saskatchewan unions beg for more COVID restrictions on
- AUPE files hundreds of complaints over AHS testing policy for unvaxxed workers on
- AHS says deploying undercover agents ‘normal’ practice on
Petition: No Media Bailouts
We the undersigned call on the Canadian government to immediately cease all payouts to media companies.
Opinion2 days ago
SLOBODIAN: Truckers going pedal-to-the-metal for Canadian freedoms
News2 days ago
AHS uses undercover agents to bust restaurant for accepting dog photos instead of QR codes
News3 days ago
WATCH: UCP MLA calls AHS ‘bloated’ and ‘underperforming’
Opinion3 days ago
KAY: Why is Prince Andrew the only one being held accountable?
News2 days ago
WORLD WATCH: UK announces COVID restrictions are over
News3 days ago
LETTER: Does Copping have scientific evidence to continue with vaccine passports?
News2 days ago
Health Minister Duclos has no info on $150-million COVID contract to SNC-Lavalin
News1 day ago
European officials call out segregation of unvaxxed as countries move away from mandates